[Making open access: history, developments and new challenges.]

Q3 Medicine
Monica Zedda
{"title":"[Making open access: history, developments and new challenges.]","authors":"Monica Zedda","doi":"10.1701/4450.44440","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The article traces the history and evolution of the Open Access (OA) Movement, officially lunched in 2001 with the Budapest Conference and solidified in 2003 with the Berlin Declaration. The OA Movement advocates for free and unrestricted access to publicly funded research results, asserting that scientific knowledge should be accessible to everyone without legal, economic, or technological barriers. The two main pathways for OA are outlined: self-archiving (green road) and publishing in entirely OA journals (gold road). The work also explores the concept of transformative journals and transformative agreements, designed to facilitate the transition of scientific journals to OA, even if with controversial and problematic outcomes. Additionally, the challenges and distortions of the publishing industry are analyzed, particularly the rising costs of Article Processing Charges (APCs) and the new OA strategies. The importance of alternative publishing models, such as diamond journals and OA platforms, is highlighted to promote more equitable and sustainable scientific communication. The role of major research funding bodies, including the European Commission and cOAlition S, is examined regarding policies and mandates for OA, emphasizing the need for a common commitment to overcome current legal and economic barriers. The article concludes that despite the progress made, many challenges remain unresolved. It calls for greater involvement of all stakeholders to implement concrete measures for awareness and support of OA. Only through collaboration at the political and institutional levels will it be possible to reshape the future of scientific publishing, break the oligopoly of major commercial publishers, and enable more democratic access to scientific knowledge.</p>","PeriodicalId":20887,"journal":{"name":"Recenti progressi in medicina","volume":"116 2","pages":"89-99"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Recenti progressi in medicina","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1701/4450.44440","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article traces the history and evolution of the Open Access (OA) Movement, officially lunched in 2001 with the Budapest Conference and solidified in 2003 with the Berlin Declaration. The OA Movement advocates for free and unrestricted access to publicly funded research results, asserting that scientific knowledge should be accessible to everyone without legal, economic, or technological barriers. The two main pathways for OA are outlined: self-archiving (green road) and publishing in entirely OA journals (gold road). The work also explores the concept of transformative journals and transformative agreements, designed to facilitate the transition of scientific journals to OA, even if with controversial and problematic outcomes. Additionally, the challenges and distortions of the publishing industry are analyzed, particularly the rising costs of Article Processing Charges (APCs) and the new OA strategies. The importance of alternative publishing models, such as diamond journals and OA platforms, is highlighted to promote more equitable and sustainable scientific communication. The role of major research funding bodies, including the European Commission and cOAlition S, is examined regarding policies and mandates for OA, emphasizing the need for a common commitment to overcome current legal and economic barriers. The article concludes that despite the progress made, many challenges remain unresolved. It calls for greater involvement of all stakeholders to implement concrete measures for awareness and support of OA. Only through collaboration at the political and institutional levels will it be possible to reshape the future of scientific publishing, break the oligopoly of major commercial publishers, and enable more democratic access to scientific knowledge.

开放获取:历史、发展和新挑战。
本文追溯了开放获取(OA)运动的历史和演变,该运动于2001年在布达佩斯会议上正式启动,并于2003年通过《柏林宣言》得到巩固。开放获取运动倡导免费和不受限制地获取公共资助的研究成果,声称科学知识应该不受法律、经济或技术障碍的限制地向每个人开放。本文概述了OA的两条主要途径:自存档(绿色道路)和在完全OA期刊上发表(金色道路)。这项工作还探讨了变革性期刊和变革性协议的概念,旨在促进科学期刊向开放获取的过渡,即使有争议和有问题的结果。此外,还分析了出版业面临的挑战和扭曲,特别是文章处理费(APCs)成本的上升和新的OA战略。报告强调了钻石期刊和开放获取平台等替代出版模式对促进更公平和可持续的科学传播的重要性。审查了主要研究资助机构,包括欧洲委员会和联盟S在开放获取方面的政策和任务方面的作用,强调需要共同承诺克服目前的法律和经济障碍。文章的结论是,尽管取得了进展,但仍有许多挑战尚未解决。它呼吁所有利益攸关方更多地参与实施具体措施,提高对开放获取的认识和支持。只有通过政治和制度层面的合作,才有可能重塑科学出版的未来,打破主要商业出版商的寡头垄断,并使科学知识的获取更加民主。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Recenti progressi in medicina
Recenti progressi in medicina Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
143
期刊介绍: Giunta ormai al sessantesimo anno, Recenti Progressi in Medicina continua a costituire un sicuro punto di riferimento ed uno strumento di lavoro fondamentale per l"ampliamento dell"orizzonte culturale del medico italiano. Recenti Progressi in Medicina è una rivista di medicina interna. Ciò significa il recupero di un"ottica globale e integrata, idonea ad evitare sia i particolarismi della informazione specialistica sia la frammentazione di quella generalista.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信