A comparison of the efficacy and safety of Chinese patent medicine combined with Western medicine for Helicobacter pylori-related gastric ulcer: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Meiqi Zhong, Qifang Sun, Baoping Ren, Chang Yu, Shunhua Zhou, Qing Gao, Xiaojuan Wang, Chengzhi Yuan, Jing Lu, Qinghua Peng, Meiyan Zeng, Houpan Song
{"title":"A comparison of the efficacy and safety of Chinese patent medicine combined with Western medicine for Helicobacter pylori-related gastric ulcer: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.","authors":"Meiqi Zhong, Qifang Sun, Baoping Ren, Chang Yu, Shunhua Zhou, Qing Gao, Xiaojuan Wang, Chengzhi Yuan, Jing Lu, Qinghua Peng, Meiyan Zeng, Houpan Song","doi":"10.1097/MD.0000000000041137","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aim of this network meta-analysis (NMA) was to compare the effectiveness and safety of different Chinese patent medicines (CPMs) combined with Western medicines (WMs) regimen versus WMs alone in the treatment of Helicobacter pylori-related gastric ulcer (GU).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive search was conducted on databases from their inception to May 31, 2023, to identify all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that investigated the efficacy of CPMs in combination with conventional WMs in the treatment of patients with H pylori-related GU. Using Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool, we evaluated the methodological quality of RCTs. R version 4.2.3 and Stata version 15.1 software were cross-merged to conduct pairwise NMA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 35 studies involving 4667 patients and 11 CPMs were identified. Eleven CPMs were analyzed, including Pingwei Capsule (PWC), Kangfuxin Solution (KFXS), Shugan Jieyu Capsule (SGJYC), Weisu Granule (WSG), Qiwei Weitong Capsule (QWWTC), Beiling Weitong Granule (BLWTG), Anweiyang Capsule (AWYC), Jinghua Weikang Capsule (JHWKC), Weifuchun Tablet (WFCT), Wenweishu Capsule (WWSC), and Weidean Capsule (WDAC). Results showed that the combination of CPM and WM was more effective relative to the WM regimen alone. NMA revealed that WWSC combined with the WM yielded superior results in enhancing clinical outcomes and mitigating GU recurrence rates. PWC combined with the WM showed the best performance in improving the H pylori eradication rate. WFCT combined with the WM had the most optimal performance in controlling gastrin (GAS) and motilin (MTL) levels. KFXS combined with the WM showed the best results in terms of reducing the incidence of adverse events.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our NMA findings indicate that the combination of WWSC, PWC, WFCT, and KFXS with WM may be more effective and advantageous outcomes compared to other CPMs. Due to the limitations of this study, future research should employ larger sample sizes and multicenter RCTs to conduct real-world clinical studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":18549,"journal":{"name":"Medicine","volume":"104 6","pages":"e41137"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11813025/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000041137","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The aim of this network meta-analysis (NMA) was to compare the effectiveness and safety of different Chinese patent medicines (CPMs) combined with Western medicines (WMs) regimen versus WMs alone in the treatment of Helicobacter pylori-related gastric ulcer (GU).

Methods: A comprehensive search was conducted on databases from their inception to May 31, 2023, to identify all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that investigated the efficacy of CPMs in combination with conventional WMs in the treatment of patients with H pylori-related GU. Using Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool, we evaluated the methodological quality of RCTs. R version 4.2.3 and Stata version 15.1 software were cross-merged to conduct pairwise NMA.

Results: A total of 35 studies involving 4667 patients and 11 CPMs were identified. Eleven CPMs were analyzed, including Pingwei Capsule (PWC), Kangfuxin Solution (KFXS), Shugan Jieyu Capsule (SGJYC), Weisu Granule (WSG), Qiwei Weitong Capsule (QWWTC), Beiling Weitong Granule (BLWTG), Anweiyang Capsule (AWYC), Jinghua Weikang Capsule (JHWKC), Weifuchun Tablet (WFCT), Wenweishu Capsule (WWSC), and Weidean Capsule (WDAC). Results showed that the combination of CPM and WM was more effective relative to the WM regimen alone. NMA revealed that WWSC combined with the WM yielded superior results in enhancing clinical outcomes and mitigating GU recurrence rates. PWC combined with the WM showed the best performance in improving the H pylori eradication rate. WFCT combined with the WM had the most optimal performance in controlling gastrin (GAS) and motilin (MTL) levels. KFXS combined with the WM showed the best results in terms of reducing the incidence of adverse events.

Conclusion: Our NMA findings indicate that the combination of WWSC, PWC, WFCT, and KFXS with WM may be more effective and advantageous outcomes compared to other CPMs. Due to the limitations of this study, future research should employ larger sample sizes and multicenter RCTs to conduct real-world clinical studies.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medicine
Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4342
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Medicine is now a fully open access journal, providing authors with a distinctive new service offering continuous publication of original research across a broad spectrum of medical scientific disciplines and sub-specialties. As an open access title, Medicine will continue to provide authors with an established, trusted platform for the publication of their work. To ensure the ongoing quality of Medicine’s content, the peer-review process will only accept content that is scientifically, technically and ethically sound, and in compliance with standard reporting guidelines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信