Gemcitabine versus Bacillus Calmette-Guerin for Intravesical Therapy in Treatment-Naïve Low-Grade Intermediate-Risk Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer.

IF 5.9 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Zine-Eddine Khene, Raj Bhanvadia, Sarah Attia, Willian Ito, Ivan Trevino, Solomon L Woldu, Vitaly Margulis, Yair Lotan
{"title":"Gemcitabine versus Bacillus Calmette-Guerin for Intravesical Therapy in Treatment-Naïve Low-Grade Intermediate-Risk Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer.","authors":"Zine-Eddine Khene, Raj Bhanvadia, Sarah Attia, Willian Ito, Ivan Trevino, Solomon L Woldu, Vitaly Margulis, Yair Lotan","doi":"10.1097/JU.0000000000004472","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Patients with intermediate-risk (IR) non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) are recommended to receive induction intravesical chemotherapy or immunotherapy. However, the comparison between gemcitabine and BCG in treatment-naive, low-grade IR-NMIBC patients remains underexplored. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of gemcitabine compared to BCG in a cohort of treatment-naive IR-NMIBC patients.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients with low grade IR-NMIBC, classified according to International Bladder Cancer Group criteria, with no prior history of induction intravesical treatment. Patients received either induction intravesical BCG or gemcitabine. Recurrence was defined as histologically confirmed cancer during follow-up, while progression included stage/grade progression. Kaplan-Meier estimates were used for survival analysis, and multivariable Cox analysis identified factors associated with recurrence and progression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 151 patients with IR-NMIBC, 78 received BCG and 73 received gemcitabine. Both groups completed the 6-week induction treatment at similar rates (100%), and maintenance therapy was administered to 47% of BCG patients and 53% of gemcitabine patients (p = 0.46). The median number of maintenance doses was 6 (IQR: 3-9) in the BCG group and 8 (IQR: 4-10) in the gemcitabine group (p = 0.83). Median follow-up was 54 months for patients receiving BCG and 36 months for patients receiving gemcitabine. After adjusting for age, IBCG subgroups, year of treatment, single postoperative instillation, and maintenance therapy, gemcitabine was associated with a higher risk of recurrence compared to BCG (p=0.02), while the risk of progression remained similar between the two groups (p = 0.87). Adverse events were observed in 62 % of patients treated with BCG and 38 % of patients treated with gemcitabine (p = 0.02).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Gemcitabine is associated with a higher risk of recurrence than BCG in treatment-naïve IR-NMIBC patients. However, both treatments show comparable efficacy in preventing disease progression.</p>","PeriodicalId":17471,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Urology","volume":" ","pages":"101097JU0000000000004472"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000004472","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Patients with intermediate-risk (IR) non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) are recommended to receive induction intravesical chemotherapy or immunotherapy. However, the comparison between gemcitabine and BCG in treatment-naive, low-grade IR-NMIBC patients remains underexplored. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of gemcitabine compared to BCG in a cohort of treatment-naive IR-NMIBC patients.

Materials and methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients with low grade IR-NMIBC, classified according to International Bladder Cancer Group criteria, with no prior history of induction intravesical treatment. Patients received either induction intravesical BCG or gemcitabine. Recurrence was defined as histologically confirmed cancer during follow-up, while progression included stage/grade progression. Kaplan-Meier estimates were used for survival analysis, and multivariable Cox analysis identified factors associated with recurrence and progression.

Results: Of the 151 patients with IR-NMIBC, 78 received BCG and 73 received gemcitabine. Both groups completed the 6-week induction treatment at similar rates (100%), and maintenance therapy was administered to 47% of BCG patients and 53% of gemcitabine patients (p = 0.46). The median number of maintenance doses was 6 (IQR: 3-9) in the BCG group and 8 (IQR: 4-10) in the gemcitabine group (p = 0.83). Median follow-up was 54 months for patients receiving BCG and 36 months for patients receiving gemcitabine. After adjusting for age, IBCG subgroups, year of treatment, single postoperative instillation, and maintenance therapy, gemcitabine was associated with a higher risk of recurrence compared to BCG (p=0.02), while the risk of progression remained similar between the two groups (p = 0.87). Adverse events were observed in 62 % of patients treated with BCG and 38 % of patients treated with gemcitabine (p = 0.02).

Conclusions: Gemcitabine is associated with a higher risk of recurrence than BCG in treatment-naïve IR-NMIBC patients. However, both treatments show comparable efficacy in preventing disease progression.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Urology
Journal of Urology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
11.50
自引率
7.60%
发文量
3746
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: The Official Journal of the American Urological Association (AUA), and the most widely read and highly cited journal in the field, The Journal of Urology® brings solid coverage of the clinically relevant content needed to stay at the forefront of the dynamic field of urology. This premier journal presents investigative studies on critical areas of research and practice, survey articles providing short condensations of the best and most important urology literature worldwide, and practice-oriented reports on significant clinical observations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信