Myocardial MRI Cine Radiomics: A Novel Approach to Risk-Stratification for Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events in Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction.

IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Ming-Lei Li, Ruo-Yang Shi, Jin-Yu Zheng, Jin-Yi Xiang, Ward Hedges, Julia Liang, Jiani Hu, Jie Chen, Lei Zhao, Lian-Ming Wu
{"title":"Myocardial MRI Cine Radiomics: A Novel Approach to Risk-Stratification for Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events in Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction.","authors":"Ming-Lei Li, Ruo-Yang Shi, Jin-Yu Zheng, Jin-Yi Xiang, Ward Hedges, Julia Liang, Jiani Hu, Jie Chen, Lei Zhao, Lian-Ming Wu","doi":"10.1002/jmri.29739","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The incremental prognostic value of integrating myocardial cine radiomics into predictive models for major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) risk in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is unclear.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To determine if myocardial cine radiomics can improve risk assessment for MACE when combined with clinical information and cardiac MRI parameters in STEMI patients.</p><p><strong>Study type: </strong>Retrospective.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>One thousand twenty-four STEMI patients (83% male; mean age 59 ± 11 years) from two centers, divided into training (819 patients) and external testing (205 patients) cohorts.</p><p><strong>Field strength/sequence: </strong>3.0 T/balanced steady-state free precession cine, and phase-sensitive inversion recovery sequences.</p><p><strong>Assessment: </strong>The Rad_score was calculated as a weighted sum of independent radiomic variables derived from the logistic regression model, providing a concise representation of their combined prognostic impact. Six risk models were developed, incorporating varying combinations of MRI parameters, clinical variables, and Rad_score to comprehensively evaluate their prognostic performance. A final risk stratification, integrating left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), the extent of late gadolinium enhancement (LGE), and Rad_score, was established and compared with one based on LVEF alone.</p><p><strong>Statistical tests: </strong>The prognostic implications of the Rad_score were evaluated using univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models. A P value <0.05 was considered significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During a median follow-up of 3.1 years, 139 patients (17%) in the training set and 30 patients (15%) in the testing set experienced MACE. Rad_score was identified as a significant risk factor for MACE, with a hazard ratio of 1.46 (1.38-1.55) (P < 0.01) in univariate Cox analysis. The risk stratification reclassified the risk for 33% of the study population in the training set and 34% in the testing set.</p><p><strong>Data conclusion: </strong>Myocardial cine radiomics are associated with MACE risk in STEMI patients and provide incremental improvement in risk stratification when combined with traditional parameters.</p><p><strong>Plain language summary: </strong>The development of radiomics has introduced new perspectives in both the diagnosis and prognosis of cardiovascular diseases. However, the incremental prognostic value of incorporating myocardial cine radiomics into predictive models for major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) risk in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) remains unclear. This study integrates radiomics with traditional clinical parameters and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to evaluate its added value in assessing MACE risk in STEMI patients. The results demonstrate that radiomics is significantly associated with MACE and provides incremental value in risk stratification. These findings offer a novel approach to improve personalized risk assessment, making it a valuable addition to the cardiovascular field.</p><p><strong>Evidence level: </strong>4 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 5.</p>","PeriodicalId":16140,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.29739","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The incremental prognostic value of integrating myocardial cine radiomics into predictive models for major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) risk in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is unclear.

Purpose: To determine if myocardial cine radiomics can improve risk assessment for MACE when combined with clinical information and cardiac MRI parameters in STEMI patients.

Study type: Retrospective.

Subjects: One thousand twenty-four STEMI patients (83% male; mean age 59 ± 11 years) from two centers, divided into training (819 patients) and external testing (205 patients) cohorts.

Field strength/sequence: 3.0 T/balanced steady-state free precession cine, and phase-sensitive inversion recovery sequences.

Assessment: The Rad_score was calculated as a weighted sum of independent radiomic variables derived from the logistic regression model, providing a concise representation of their combined prognostic impact. Six risk models were developed, incorporating varying combinations of MRI parameters, clinical variables, and Rad_score to comprehensively evaluate their prognostic performance. A final risk stratification, integrating left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), the extent of late gadolinium enhancement (LGE), and Rad_score, was established and compared with one based on LVEF alone.

Statistical tests: The prognostic implications of the Rad_score were evaluated using univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models. A P value <0.05 was considered significant.

Results: During a median follow-up of 3.1 years, 139 patients (17%) in the training set and 30 patients (15%) in the testing set experienced MACE. Rad_score was identified as a significant risk factor for MACE, with a hazard ratio of 1.46 (1.38-1.55) (P < 0.01) in univariate Cox analysis. The risk stratification reclassified the risk for 33% of the study population in the training set and 34% in the testing set.

Data conclusion: Myocardial cine radiomics are associated with MACE risk in STEMI patients and provide incremental improvement in risk stratification when combined with traditional parameters.

Plain language summary: The development of radiomics has introduced new perspectives in both the diagnosis and prognosis of cardiovascular diseases. However, the incremental prognostic value of incorporating myocardial cine radiomics into predictive models for major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) risk in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) remains unclear. This study integrates radiomics with traditional clinical parameters and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to evaluate its added value in assessing MACE risk in STEMI patients. The results demonstrate that radiomics is significantly associated with MACE and provides incremental value in risk stratification. These findings offer a novel approach to improve personalized risk assessment, making it a valuable addition to the cardiovascular field.

Evidence level: 4 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 5.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
6.80%
发文量
494
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (JMRI) is an international journal devoted to the timely publication of basic and clinical research, educational and review articles, and other information related to the diagnostic applications of magnetic resonance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信