If We Build It, Why They Do Not Come? An American College of Surgeons National Quality Improvement Collaborative to Understand Barriers to Completion of Cancer Treatment.

IF 4.7 3区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Lauren M Janczewski, Anthony D Yang, Eileen Reilly, Kelley Chan, Tashae Coates, Shayla Scarlett, Susan Hedlund, Rebecca A Snyder, Bruce Haffty, Charles Shelton, Laurie J Kirstein
{"title":"If We Build It, Why They Do Not Come? An American College of Surgeons National Quality Improvement Collaborative to Understand Barriers to Completion of Cancer Treatment.","authors":"Lauren M Janczewski, Anthony D Yang, Eileen Reilly, Kelley Chan, Tashae Coates, Shayla Scarlett, Susan Hedlund, Rebecca A Snyder, Bruce Haffty, Charles Shelton, Laurie J Kirstein","doi":"10.1200/OP-24-00745","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Many patients face barriers to cancer care, leading to disparities in cancer-specific outcomes. Specifically, missing multiple radiation treatments can be associated with increased locoregional recurrence. We sought to assess the frequency and reasons for missed radiotherapy among accredited cancer programs participating in a national quality improvement (QI) collaborative addressing barriers to care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Breaking Barriers National QI Collaborative conducted through the American College of Surgeons Cancer Programs enrolled 342 accredited cancer programs, prospectively recording patients scheduled for a 15-45-day course of radiotherapy over five separate, 60-day data collection periods (March-December 2023). Programs identified those who missed ≥three treatments, referred to as at risk of worse outcomes, and queried reasons for missed radiotherapy. Kruskal-Wallis tests assessed differences in rates of missed treatments.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 332 programs (97.1%) identified at-risk patients, totaling 5,221 patients who missed ≥three treatments. The median percentage of at-risk patients per program was 9.4% (IQR, 4.5-16.5). Programs located in the Northeast (median, 11.3% [IQR, 5.4-17.3]) had the highest proportion of at-risk patients (<i>P</i> = .014). Patients with rectal (13.0%) and gynecologic (11.4%) cancers were most frequently at risk (<i>P</i> < .001). Overall, 91.0% of hospitals reported missed radiation treatments due to illness unrelated to treatment, 71.7% due to transportation, 54.2% due to conflicting appointments, and 53.0% due to no longer wishing to pursue treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Barriers to completing radiotherapy are prevalent among accredited cancer programs nationwide. Future work developing interventions in response to identified barriers in this national QI collaborative may be scalable to other areas of cancer care to improve outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":14612,"journal":{"name":"JCO oncology practice","volume":" ","pages":"OP2400745"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JCO oncology practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/OP-24-00745","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Many patients face barriers to cancer care, leading to disparities in cancer-specific outcomes. Specifically, missing multiple radiation treatments can be associated with increased locoregional recurrence. We sought to assess the frequency and reasons for missed radiotherapy among accredited cancer programs participating in a national quality improvement (QI) collaborative addressing barriers to care.

Methods: The Breaking Barriers National QI Collaborative conducted through the American College of Surgeons Cancer Programs enrolled 342 accredited cancer programs, prospectively recording patients scheduled for a 15-45-day course of radiotherapy over five separate, 60-day data collection periods (March-December 2023). Programs identified those who missed ≥three treatments, referred to as at risk of worse outcomes, and queried reasons for missed radiotherapy. Kruskal-Wallis tests assessed differences in rates of missed treatments.

Results: In total, 332 programs (97.1%) identified at-risk patients, totaling 5,221 patients who missed ≥three treatments. The median percentage of at-risk patients per program was 9.4% (IQR, 4.5-16.5). Programs located in the Northeast (median, 11.3% [IQR, 5.4-17.3]) had the highest proportion of at-risk patients (P = .014). Patients with rectal (13.0%) and gynecologic (11.4%) cancers were most frequently at risk (P < .001). Overall, 91.0% of hospitals reported missed radiation treatments due to illness unrelated to treatment, 71.7% due to transportation, 54.2% due to conflicting appointments, and 53.0% due to no longer wishing to pursue treatment.

Conclusion: Barriers to completing radiotherapy are prevalent among accredited cancer programs nationwide. Future work developing interventions in response to identified barriers in this national QI collaborative may be scalable to other areas of cancer care to improve outcomes.

如果我们建立了它,为什么他们不来?美国外科医师学会全国质量改进协作了解癌症治疗完成的障碍。
目的:许多患者面临癌症治疗的障碍,导致癌症特异性结果的差异。具体来说,缺少多次放射治疗可能与局部复发增加有关。我们试图评估参与国家质量改进(QI)合作解决护理障碍的认可癌症项目中错过放射治疗的频率和原因。方法:打破障碍国家QI协作通过美国外科医师学会癌症项目开展,招募了342个经认证的癌症项目,前瞻性地记录了5个独立的60天数据收集期(2023年3月至12月)的15-45天放疗疗程的患者。程序确定那些错过≥3次治疗的患者,即有不良预后风险的患者,并询问错过放疗的原因。Kruskal-Wallis测试评估了错过治疗率的差异。结果:共有332个项目(97.1%)确定了高危患者,总计5221例患者错过了≥3次治疗。每个项目中高危患者的中位数百分比为9.4% (IQR, 4.5-16.5)。位于东北部的项目(中位数为11.3% [IQR, 5.4-17.3])的高危患者比例最高(P = 0.014)。直肠癌(13.0%)和妇科(11.4%)的风险最高(P < 0.001)。总体而言,91.0%的医院报告因与治疗无关的疾病而错过放射治疗,71.7%因交通原因,54.2%因预约冲突,53.0%因不再希望继续治疗。结论:在全国认可的癌症项目中,完成放疗的障碍普遍存在。未来发展干预措施以应对国家QI合作中确定的障碍的工作可能会扩展到其他癌症护理领域,以改善结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
7.50%
发文量
518
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信