Alison Leslie, Scott A Chapman, Katelyn M Tessier, Christopher Tignanelli, Sameh Hozayen
{"title":"Beyond the Guidelines: Original Research on Real-World Outcomes of Anticoagulation and Corticosteroid in COVID-19.","authors":"Alison Leslie, Scott A Chapman, Katelyn M Tessier, Christopher Tignanelli, Sameh Hozayen","doi":"10.1016/j.ijid.2025.107834","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic has led to the widespread use of anticoagulation (AC) and corticosteroids (CCS) for hospitalized patients, but real-world outcomes may differ from clinical trial findings due to diverse patient populations and treatment variability.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the real-world impact of AC and CCS therapies on key clinical outcomes in hospitalized COVID-19 patients.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Multicenter, retrospective observational cohort study conducted across 11 hospitals in a Midwest health system.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>The study included 4,754 hospitalized COVID-19 patients treated with AC, CCS, both (AC+CCS), or neither. The 'neither' group served as the reference for comparisons.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Interventions included administration of AC, CCS, both AC+CCS, or no intervention.</p><p><strong>Main measures: </strong>Primary outcomes included thromboembolism (TE), bleeding events, ICU admissions, invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV), and in-hospital mortality.</p><p><strong>Key results: </strong>Compared to the reference group, the AC+CCS group had significantly lower odds of TE (aOR 0.61, 95% CI 0.43-0.87) and bleeding events (aOR 0.15 95% CI (0.08, 0.27)). The AC-only group demonstrated the lowest ICU admission, IMV, and mortality rates (aHR 0.30 95% CI (0.17, 0.53)). The CCS-only group had the highest rates of adverse outcomes, likely reflecting greater baseline illness severity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study emphasizes the importance of individualized treatment strategies in hospitalized COVID-19 patients, showing that real-world outcomes of AC and CCS can differ significantly from controlled trials. These findings provide crucial insights for adapting clinical guidelines to diverse patient settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":14006,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Infectious Diseases","volume":" ","pages":"107834"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2025.107834","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has led to the widespread use of anticoagulation (AC) and corticosteroids (CCS) for hospitalized patients, but real-world outcomes may differ from clinical trial findings due to diverse patient populations and treatment variability.
Objective: To evaluate the real-world impact of AC and CCS therapies on key clinical outcomes in hospitalized COVID-19 patients.
Design: Multicenter, retrospective observational cohort study conducted across 11 hospitals in a Midwest health system.
Participants: The study included 4,754 hospitalized COVID-19 patients treated with AC, CCS, both (AC+CCS), or neither. The 'neither' group served as the reference for comparisons.
Interventions: Interventions included administration of AC, CCS, both AC+CCS, or no intervention.
Main measures: Primary outcomes included thromboembolism (TE), bleeding events, ICU admissions, invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV), and in-hospital mortality.
Key results: Compared to the reference group, the AC+CCS group had significantly lower odds of TE (aOR 0.61, 95% CI 0.43-0.87) and bleeding events (aOR 0.15 95% CI (0.08, 0.27)). The AC-only group demonstrated the lowest ICU admission, IMV, and mortality rates (aHR 0.30 95% CI (0.17, 0.53)). The CCS-only group had the highest rates of adverse outcomes, likely reflecting greater baseline illness severity.
Conclusions: This study emphasizes the importance of individualized treatment strategies in hospitalized COVID-19 patients, showing that real-world outcomes of AC and CCS can differ significantly from controlled trials. These findings provide crucial insights for adapting clinical guidelines to diverse patient settings.
期刊介绍:
International Journal of Infectious Diseases (IJID)
Publisher: International Society for Infectious Diseases
Publication Frequency: Monthly
Type: Peer-reviewed, Open Access
Scope:
Publishes original clinical and laboratory-based research.
Reports clinical trials, reviews, and some case reports.
Focuses on epidemiology, clinical diagnosis, treatment, and control of infectious diseases.
Emphasizes diseases common in under-resourced countries.