Emergency Department Mental Health Presentations in Young Children Letter to the Editor “Addressing the Unique Challenges of Paediatric Mental Health Emergency Care” Response

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS
Elyssia M. Bourke, Daniela F. Say, Anna Carison, Sinead M. O'Donnell, Franz E. Babl, the Paediatric Research in Emergency Departments International Collaborative (PREDICT) research network
{"title":"Emergency Department Mental Health Presentations in Young Children Letter to the Editor “Addressing the Unique Challenges of Paediatric Mental Health Emergency Care” Response","authors":"Elyssia M. Bourke,&nbsp;Daniela F. Say,&nbsp;Anna Carison,&nbsp;Sinead M. O'Donnell,&nbsp;Franz E. Babl,&nbsp;the Paediatric Research in Emergency Departments International Collaborative (PREDICT) research network","doi":"10.1111/jpc.70005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In reply:</p><p>We thank the authors for their thoughtful response to our article <i>Emergency department mental health presentations in young children: a retrospective chart review</i> [<span>1</span>]. Their efforts to highlight potential interventions for young children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) who present to the Emergency Department (ED) with acute behavioural disturbance are commendable.</p><p>We agree that utilising strategies to reduce or eliminate the use of restrictive interventions including mechanical and physical restraint is a high priority when caring for young people presenting to the ED with behavioural disturbance. This is true regardless of whether the young person is neurotypical or neurodiverse. There is limited literature assessing the experience of young people when restrictive interventions are used in the context of behavioural disturbance management. Adults who were physically restrained during an episode of behavioural disturbance have reported feelings of dehumanisation as well as anxiety relating to seeking healthcare in the future [<span>2</span>]. Due to the negative effects of restrictive interventions, alternate strategies to manage acute behavioural disturbance are vital.</p><p>The suggestion from Chen et al. regarding the use of non-pharmacological strategies to de-escalate the young person's behaviour is logical. It is worth noting though that currently there have been no studies which have objectively assessed the effectiveness of these strategies for young people experiencing acute behavioural disturbance in the ED setting. A concerted focus on establishing an evidence base for which non-pharmacological strategies are most effective is therefore a high research priority.</p><p>We support the suggestion from the authors to consider the involvement of caregivers in guiding the most effective non-pharmacological strategies for these young people. However, an episode of acute behavioural disturbance—and in particular one that has necessitated an ED presentation—can be a unique situation. Evidence suggests that in this particular circumstance the caregivers of these young people are often overwhelmed, exhausted and have tried every strategy that would normally assist in calming their child down prior to presenting to ED [<span>2</span>]. These parents may therefore need to take a step back from guiding their child's management to provide them with a physical and emotional break.</p><p>It is also worth highlighting that although using least restrictive strategies is a priority in these presentations, this needs to be balanced against the risk of physical and psychological harm that these young people pose to themselves, their caregivers and to healthcare staff [<span>3, 4</span>]. Emergency care workers report the highest rates of occupational violence and aggression across the health system, and acute behavioural disturbance presentations account for a large proportion of these incidents [<span>5</span>]. The situation therefore needs to be assessed on a case-by-case basis considering the risk of both using and not using restrictive management strategies to achieve behavioural containment.</p><p>Young people with acute behavioural disturbance, in particular those with a diagnosis of ASD represent a considerable challenge in the acute care setting. We need to use all the tools available to optimise their care and develop the evidence for the most effective non-pharmacological strategies.</p><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest.</p>","PeriodicalId":16648,"journal":{"name":"Journal of paediatrics and child health","volume":"61 4","pages":"655-656"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jpc.70005","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of paediatrics and child health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jpc.70005","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In reply:

We thank the authors for their thoughtful response to our article Emergency department mental health presentations in young children: a retrospective chart review [1]. Their efforts to highlight potential interventions for young children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) who present to the Emergency Department (ED) with acute behavioural disturbance are commendable.

We agree that utilising strategies to reduce or eliminate the use of restrictive interventions including mechanical and physical restraint is a high priority when caring for young people presenting to the ED with behavioural disturbance. This is true regardless of whether the young person is neurotypical or neurodiverse. There is limited literature assessing the experience of young people when restrictive interventions are used in the context of behavioural disturbance management. Adults who were physically restrained during an episode of behavioural disturbance have reported feelings of dehumanisation as well as anxiety relating to seeking healthcare in the future [2]. Due to the negative effects of restrictive interventions, alternate strategies to manage acute behavioural disturbance are vital.

The suggestion from Chen et al. regarding the use of non-pharmacological strategies to de-escalate the young person's behaviour is logical. It is worth noting though that currently there have been no studies which have objectively assessed the effectiveness of these strategies for young people experiencing acute behavioural disturbance in the ED setting. A concerted focus on establishing an evidence base for which non-pharmacological strategies are most effective is therefore a high research priority.

We support the suggestion from the authors to consider the involvement of caregivers in guiding the most effective non-pharmacological strategies for these young people. However, an episode of acute behavioural disturbance—and in particular one that has necessitated an ED presentation—can be a unique situation. Evidence suggests that in this particular circumstance the caregivers of these young people are often overwhelmed, exhausted and have tried every strategy that would normally assist in calming their child down prior to presenting to ED [2]. These parents may therefore need to take a step back from guiding their child's management to provide them with a physical and emotional break.

It is also worth highlighting that although using least restrictive strategies is a priority in these presentations, this needs to be balanced against the risk of physical and psychological harm that these young people pose to themselves, their caregivers and to healthcare staff [3, 4]. Emergency care workers report the highest rates of occupational violence and aggression across the health system, and acute behavioural disturbance presentations account for a large proportion of these incidents [5]. The situation therefore needs to be assessed on a case-by-case basis considering the risk of both using and not using restrictive management strategies to achieve behavioural containment.

Young people with acute behavioural disturbance, in particular those with a diagnosis of ASD represent a considerable challenge in the acute care setting. We need to use all the tools available to optimise their care and develop the evidence for the most effective non-pharmacological strategies.

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.90%
发文量
487
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health publishes original research articles of scientific excellence in paediatrics and child health. Research Articles, Case Reports and Letters to the Editor are published, together with invited Reviews, Annotations, Editorial Comments and manuscripts of educational interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信