Emergency Department Mental Health Presentations in Young Children Letter to the Editor “Addressing the Unique Challenges of Paediatric Mental Health Emergency Care” Response

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS
Elyssia M. Bourke, Daniela F. Say, Anna Carison, Sinead M. O'Donnell, Franz E. Babl, the Paediatric Research in Emergency Departments International Collaborative (PREDICT) research network
{"title":"Emergency Department Mental Health Presentations in Young Children Letter to the Editor “Addressing the Unique Challenges of Paediatric Mental Health Emergency Care” Response","authors":"Elyssia M. Bourke,&nbsp;Daniela F. Say,&nbsp;Anna Carison,&nbsp;Sinead M. O'Donnell,&nbsp;Franz E. Babl,&nbsp;the Paediatric Research in Emergency Departments International Collaborative (PREDICT) research network","doi":"10.1111/jpc.70005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In reply:</p><p>We thank the authors for their thoughtful response to our article <i>Emergency department mental health presentations in young children: a retrospective chart review</i> [<span>1</span>]. Their efforts to highlight potential interventions for young children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) who present to the Emergency Department (ED) with acute behavioural disturbance are commendable.</p><p>We agree that utilising strategies to reduce or eliminate the use of restrictive interventions including mechanical and physical restraint is a high priority when caring for young people presenting to the ED with behavioural disturbance. This is true regardless of whether the young person is neurotypical or neurodiverse. There is limited literature assessing the experience of young people when restrictive interventions are used in the context of behavioural disturbance management. Adults who were physically restrained during an episode of behavioural disturbance have reported feelings of dehumanisation as well as anxiety relating to seeking healthcare in the future [<span>2</span>]. Due to the negative effects of restrictive interventions, alternate strategies to manage acute behavioural disturbance are vital.</p><p>The suggestion from Chen et al. regarding the use of non-pharmacological strategies to de-escalate the young person's behaviour is logical. It is worth noting though that currently there have been no studies which have objectively assessed the effectiveness of these strategies for young people experiencing acute behavioural disturbance in the ED setting. A concerted focus on establishing an evidence base for which non-pharmacological strategies are most effective is therefore a high research priority.</p><p>We support the suggestion from the authors to consider the involvement of caregivers in guiding the most effective non-pharmacological strategies for these young people. However, an episode of acute behavioural disturbance—and in particular one that has necessitated an ED presentation—can be a unique situation. Evidence suggests that in this particular circumstance the caregivers of these young people are often overwhelmed, exhausted and have tried every strategy that would normally assist in calming their child down prior to presenting to ED [<span>2</span>]. These parents may therefore need to take a step back from guiding their child's management to provide them with a physical and emotional break.</p><p>It is also worth highlighting that although using least restrictive strategies is a priority in these presentations, this needs to be balanced against the risk of physical and psychological harm that these young people pose to themselves, their caregivers and to healthcare staff [<span>3, 4</span>]. Emergency care workers report the highest rates of occupational violence and aggression across the health system, and acute behavioural disturbance presentations account for a large proportion of these incidents [<span>5</span>]. The situation therefore needs to be assessed on a case-by-case basis considering the risk of both using and not using restrictive management strategies to achieve behavioural containment.</p><p>Young people with acute behavioural disturbance, in particular those with a diagnosis of ASD represent a considerable challenge in the acute care setting. We need to use all the tools available to optimise their care and develop the evidence for the most effective non-pharmacological strategies.</p><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest.</p>","PeriodicalId":16648,"journal":{"name":"Journal of paediatrics and child health","volume":"61 4","pages":"655-656"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jpc.70005","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of paediatrics and child health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jpc.70005","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In reply:

We thank the authors for their thoughtful response to our article Emergency department mental health presentations in young children: a retrospective chart review [1]. Their efforts to highlight potential interventions for young children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) who present to the Emergency Department (ED) with acute behavioural disturbance are commendable.

We agree that utilising strategies to reduce or eliminate the use of restrictive interventions including mechanical and physical restraint is a high priority when caring for young people presenting to the ED with behavioural disturbance. This is true regardless of whether the young person is neurotypical or neurodiverse. There is limited literature assessing the experience of young people when restrictive interventions are used in the context of behavioural disturbance management. Adults who were physically restrained during an episode of behavioural disturbance have reported feelings of dehumanisation as well as anxiety relating to seeking healthcare in the future [2]. Due to the negative effects of restrictive interventions, alternate strategies to manage acute behavioural disturbance are vital.

The suggestion from Chen et al. regarding the use of non-pharmacological strategies to de-escalate the young person's behaviour is logical. It is worth noting though that currently there have been no studies which have objectively assessed the effectiveness of these strategies for young people experiencing acute behavioural disturbance in the ED setting. A concerted focus on establishing an evidence base for which non-pharmacological strategies are most effective is therefore a high research priority.

We support the suggestion from the authors to consider the involvement of caregivers in guiding the most effective non-pharmacological strategies for these young people. However, an episode of acute behavioural disturbance—and in particular one that has necessitated an ED presentation—can be a unique situation. Evidence suggests that in this particular circumstance the caregivers of these young people are often overwhelmed, exhausted and have tried every strategy that would normally assist in calming their child down prior to presenting to ED [2]. These parents may therefore need to take a step back from guiding their child's management to provide them with a physical and emotional break.

It is also worth highlighting that although using least restrictive strategies is a priority in these presentations, this needs to be balanced against the risk of physical and psychological harm that these young people pose to themselves, their caregivers and to healthcare staff [3, 4]. Emergency care workers report the highest rates of occupational violence and aggression across the health system, and acute behavioural disturbance presentations account for a large proportion of these incidents [5]. The situation therefore needs to be assessed on a case-by-case basis considering the risk of both using and not using restrictive management strategies to achieve behavioural containment.

Young people with acute behavioural disturbance, in particular those with a diagnosis of ASD represent a considerable challenge in the acute care setting. We need to use all the tools available to optimise their care and develop the evidence for the most effective non-pharmacological strategies.

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

急诊科心理健康在幼儿中的表现给编辑的信“解决儿科心理健康紧急护理的独特挑战”回应。
作为答复:我们感谢作者对我们的文章《急诊科儿童心理健康表现:回顾性图表回顾》的周到回应。他们的努力强调了对患有自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)的儿童的潜在干预措施,这些儿童在急诊室(ED)有急性行为障碍,这是值得赞扬的。我们同意使用策略来减少或消除限制性干预措施的使用,包括机械和身体约束,这是照顾患有行为障碍的年轻人到急诊科时的当务之急。无论年轻人是神经典型还是神经多样性,这都是正确的。在行为障碍管理中使用限制性干预措施时,评估年轻人经验的文献有限。在行为障碍发作期间身体受到限制的成年人报告说,他们感到失去人性,并对未来寻求医疗保健感到焦虑。由于限制性干预措施的负面影响,管理急性行为障碍的替代策略至关重要。Chen等人关于使用非药物策略来降低年轻人行为的建议是合乎逻辑的。值得注意的是,目前还没有研究客观地评估这些策略对在ED环境中经历急性行为障碍的年轻人的有效性。因此,协调一致地建立非药物策略最有效的证据基础是一个高度优先的研究重点。我们支持作者的建议,考虑照顾者参与指导这些年轻人最有效的非药物策略。然而,急性行为障碍的发作,特别是需要急诊科表现的发作,可能是一种独特的情况。有证据表明,在这种特殊情况下,这些年轻人的照顾者往往不堪重负,疲惫不堪,并尝试了每一种通常有助于让孩子平静下来的策略,然后才出现在急诊室。因此,这些父母可能需要从指导孩子的管理中退后一步,为他们提供身体和情感上的休息。同样值得强调的是,尽管在这些介绍中优先使用限制最少的策略,但这需要与这些年轻人对自己、照顾者和医护人员造成身心伤害的风险相平衡[3,4]。在整个卫生系统中,紧急护理工作者报告的职业暴力和攻击率最高,急性行为障碍的表现占这些事件的很大一部分。因此,需要逐案评估情况,考虑使用和不使用限制性管理战略以实现行为遏制的风险。患有急性行为障碍的年轻人,特别是那些被诊断为ASD的年轻人,在急性护理环境中是一个相当大的挑战。我们需要使用所有可用的工具来优化他们的护理,并为最有效的非药物策略提供证据。作者声明无利益冲突。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.90%
发文量
487
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health publishes original research articles of scientific excellence in paediatrics and child health. Research Articles, Case Reports and Letters to the Editor are published, together with invited Reviews, Annotations, Editorial Comments and manuscripts of educational interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信