To be or not to be satisfied in your romantic relationship: evaluating the reliability and validity of the Valentine scale.

IF 4.3 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Cognitive Behaviour Therapy Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-10 DOI:10.1080/16506073.2024.2420655
Jón Ingi Hlynsson, Ísak Örn Ívarsson, Gerhard Andersson, Per Carlbring
{"title":"To be or not to be satisfied in your romantic relationship: evaluating the reliability and validity of the Valentine scale.","authors":"Jón Ingi Hlynsson, Ísak Örn Ívarsson, Gerhard Andersson, Per Carlbring","doi":"10.1080/16506073.2024.2420655","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>An intimate partner relationship is one of the most significant life goals for humans. Romantic relationships can promote healthy behavior and buffer against the development of psychiatric disorders. However, reliable and valid measures of relationship satisfaction are lacking. The Valentine scale is a freely available brief measure of relationship satisfaction (https://osf.io/fb72s), intended to provide an easily interpretable index of relationship satisfaction. Across two studies, we evaluated the reliability, validity, and factor structure of the Valentine scale. Study One (<i>n</i> = 851) explored the factor structure of the Valentine scale, assessed its test-retest reliability, and criterion-related validity. Study Two (<i>n</i> = 527) confirmed the factor structure of the Valentine scale, explored its measurement invariance, and further evaluated criterion-related validity. The results supported a unidimensional structure of the Valentine scale. Furthermore, the Valentine scale exhibited good internal reliability (Cronbach's alpha = .75 and .81 in Study One and Two, respectively), high test-retest reliability (ICC<sub>3</sub> = .80 at a two-week follow-up in Study One), and appropriate criterion-related validity demonstrating positive correlations with other measures of relationship satisfaction and positive affect, as well as and negative correlations with measures of psychopathology. Together, these findings provide good support for the usage of the Valentine scale to quantify relationship satisfaction.</p>","PeriodicalId":10535,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Behaviour Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"477-501"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Behaviour Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/16506073.2024.2420655","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

An intimate partner relationship is one of the most significant life goals for humans. Romantic relationships can promote healthy behavior and buffer against the development of psychiatric disorders. However, reliable and valid measures of relationship satisfaction are lacking. The Valentine scale is a freely available brief measure of relationship satisfaction (https://osf.io/fb72s), intended to provide an easily interpretable index of relationship satisfaction. Across two studies, we evaluated the reliability, validity, and factor structure of the Valentine scale. Study One (n = 851) explored the factor structure of the Valentine scale, assessed its test-retest reliability, and criterion-related validity. Study Two (n = 527) confirmed the factor structure of the Valentine scale, explored its measurement invariance, and further evaluated criterion-related validity. The results supported a unidimensional structure of the Valentine scale. Furthermore, the Valentine scale exhibited good internal reliability (Cronbach's alpha = .75 and .81 in Study One and Two, respectively), high test-retest reliability (ICC3 = .80 at a two-week follow-up in Study One), and appropriate criterion-related validity demonstrating positive correlations with other measures of relationship satisfaction and positive affect, as well as and negative correlations with measures of psychopathology. Together, these findings provide good support for the usage of the Valentine scale to quantify relationship satisfaction.

对你的恋爱关系满意还是不满意:评估情人节量表的可靠性和有效性。
亲密的伴侣关系是人类最重要的生活目标之一。浪漫的关系可以促进健康的行为,缓冲精神疾病的发展。然而,缺乏可靠和有效的关系满意度测量方法。瓦伦丁量表是一个免费的关系满意度的简短测量(https://osf.io/fb72s),旨在提供一个容易解释的关系满意度指数。在两项研究中,我们评估了瓦伦丁量表的信度、效度和因素结构。研究一(n = 851)探讨Valentine量表的因子结构,评估其重测信度和标准相关效度。研究二(n = 527)证实了Valentine量表的因子结构,探讨了其测量不变性,并进一步评价了量表的效度。研究结果支持瓦伦丁量表的单维结构。此外,瓦伦丁量表具有良好的内部信度(Cronbach’s alpha =)。在研究一和研究二中分别为75和0.81),高重测信度(ICC3 =。80,在研究一的两周随访中),适当的标准相关效度显示与关系满意度和积极影响的其他测量呈正相关,以及与精神病理学测量负相关。总之,这些发现为使用瓦伦丁量表量化关系满意度提供了很好的支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cognitive Behaviour Therapy
Cognitive Behaviour Therapy PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: Cognitive Behaviour Therapy is a peer reviewed, multidisciplinary journal devoted to the application of behavioural and cognitive sciences to clinical psychology and psychotherapy. The journal publishes state-of-the-art scientific articles within: - clinical and health psychology - psychopathology - behavioural medicine - assessment - treatment - theoretical issues pertinent to behavioural, cognitive and combined cognitive behavioural therapies With the number of high quality contributions increasing, the journal has been able to maintain a rapid publication schedule, providing readers with the latest research in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信