To be or not to be satisfied in your romantic relationship: evaluating the reliability and validity of the Valentine scale.

IF 4.3 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Jón Ingi Hlynsson, Ísak Örn Ívarsson, Gerhard Andersson, Per Carlbring
{"title":"To be or not to be satisfied in your romantic relationship: evaluating the reliability and validity of the Valentine scale.","authors":"Jón Ingi Hlynsson, Ísak Örn Ívarsson, Gerhard Andersson, Per Carlbring","doi":"10.1080/16506073.2024.2420655","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>An intimate partner relationship is one of the most significant life goals for humans. Romantic relationships can promote healthy behavior and buffer against the development of psychiatric disorders. However, reliable and valid measures of relationship satisfaction are lacking. The Valentine scale is a freely available brief measure of relationship satisfaction (https://osf.io/fb72s), intended to provide an easily interpretable index of relationship satisfaction. Across two studies, we evaluated the reliability, validity, and factor structure of the Valentine scale. Study One (<i>n</i> = 851) explored the factor structure of the Valentine scale, assessed its test-retest reliability, and criterion-related validity. Study Two (<i>n</i> = 527) confirmed the factor structure of the Valentine scale, explored its measurement invariance, and further evaluated criterion-related validity. The results supported a unidimensional structure of the Valentine scale. Furthermore, the Valentine scale exhibited good internal reliability (Cronbach's alpha = .75 and .81 in Study One and Two, respectively), high test-retest reliability (ICC<sub>3</sub> = .80 at a two-week follow-up in Study One), and appropriate criterion-related validity demonstrating positive correlations with other measures of relationship satisfaction and positive affect, as well as and negative correlations with measures of psychopathology. Together, these findings provide good support for the usage of the Valentine scale to quantify relationship satisfaction.</p>","PeriodicalId":10535,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Behaviour Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"1-25"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Behaviour Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/16506073.2024.2420655","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

An intimate partner relationship is one of the most significant life goals for humans. Romantic relationships can promote healthy behavior and buffer against the development of psychiatric disorders. However, reliable and valid measures of relationship satisfaction are lacking. The Valentine scale is a freely available brief measure of relationship satisfaction (https://osf.io/fb72s), intended to provide an easily interpretable index of relationship satisfaction. Across two studies, we evaluated the reliability, validity, and factor structure of the Valentine scale. Study One (n = 851) explored the factor structure of the Valentine scale, assessed its test-retest reliability, and criterion-related validity. Study Two (n = 527) confirmed the factor structure of the Valentine scale, explored its measurement invariance, and further evaluated criterion-related validity. The results supported a unidimensional structure of the Valentine scale. Furthermore, the Valentine scale exhibited good internal reliability (Cronbach's alpha = .75 and .81 in Study One and Two, respectively), high test-retest reliability (ICC3 = .80 at a two-week follow-up in Study One), and appropriate criterion-related validity demonstrating positive correlations with other measures of relationship satisfaction and positive affect, as well as and negative correlations with measures of psychopathology. Together, these findings provide good support for the usage of the Valentine scale to quantify relationship satisfaction.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cognitive Behaviour Therapy
Cognitive Behaviour Therapy PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: Cognitive Behaviour Therapy is a peer reviewed, multidisciplinary journal devoted to the application of behavioural and cognitive sciences to clinical psychology and psychotherapy. The journal publishes state-of-the-art scientific articles within: - clinical and health psychology - psychopathology - behavioural medicine - assessment - treatment - theoretical issues pertinent to behavioural, cognitive and combined cognitive behavioural therapies With the number of high quality contributions increasing, the journal has been able to maintain a rapid publication schedule, providing readers with the latest research in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信