{"title":"Postoperative radiotherapy for stage pIIIA-N2 non-small cell lung cancer patients undergoing sublobar resection: A retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Shou-Feng Wang, Xin-Bin Pan, Wei Huang, Yin-Nong Zhao","doi":"10.1097/MD.0000000000041462","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study assesses the effect of postoperative radiotherapy on survival outcomes in patients diagnosed with stage pIIIA-N2 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after sublobar resection. Data of patients with stage pIIIA-N2 NSCLC who underwent sublobar resection were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database spanning from 2000 to 2020. Patients were divided into 2 groups: postoperative radiotherapy and observation. Cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed and compared between the 2 groups. A total of 444 patients were included in the study, with 210 (47.3%) receiving postoperative radiotherapy and 234 (52.7%) with observation. The CSS (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.99, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.78-1.26; P = .926) and OS (HR = 0.93, 95% CI: 0.75-1.15; P = .512) did not show significant differences between the postoperative radiotherapy and observation groups. Subgroup analysis of patients receiving postoperative chemotherapy revealed comparable CSS (HR = 1.24, 95% CI: 0.89-1.71; P = .203) and OS (HR = 1.12, 95% CI: 0.85-1.49; P = .425) between the 2 groups. Similarly, for patients without postoperative chemotherapy, CSS (HR = 1.11, 95% CI: 0.66-1.84; P = .699) and OS (HR = 1.08, 95% CI: 0.68-1.71; P = .740) were not significantly different between the 2 groups. Postoperative radiotherapy does not improve survival in patients with stage pIIIA-N2 NSCLC following sublobar resection.</p>","PeriodicalId":18549,"journal":{"name":"Medicine","volume":"104 6","pages":"e41462"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11813015/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000041462","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study assesses the effect of postoperative radiotherapy on survival outcomes in patients diagnosed with stage pIIIA-N2 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after sublobar resection. Data of patients with stage pIIIA-N2 NSCLC who underwent sublobar resection were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database spanning from 2000 to 2020. Patients were divided into 2 groups: postoperative radiotherapy and observation. Cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed and compared between the 2 groups. A total of 444 patients were included in the study, with 210 (47.3%) receiving postoperative radiotherapy and 234 (52.7%) with observation. The CSS (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.99, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.78-1.26; P = .926) and OS (HR = 0.93, 95% CI: 0.75-1.15; P = .512) did not show significant differences between the postoperative radiotherapy and observation groups. Subgroup analysis of patients receiving postoperative chemotherapy revealed comparable CSS (HR = 1.24, 95% CI: 0.89-1.71; P = .203) and OS (HR = 1.12, 95% CI: 0.85-1.49; P = .425) between the 2 groups. Similarly, for patients without postoperative chemotherapy, CSS (HR = 1.11, 95% CI: 0.66-1.84; P = .699) and OS (HR = 1.08, 95% CI: 0.68-1.71; P = .740) were not significantly different between the 2 groups. Postoperative radiotherapy does not improve survival in patients with stage pIIIA-N2 NSCLC following sublobar resection.
期刊介绍:
Medicine is now a fully open access journal, providing authors with a distinctive new service offering continuous publication of original research across a broad spectrum of medical scientific disciplines and sub-specialties.
As an open access title, Medicine will continue to provide authors with an established, trusted platform for the publication of their work. To ensure the ongoing quality of Medicine’s content, the peer-review process will only accept content that is scientifically, technically and ethically sound, and in compliance with standard reporting guidelines.