Real-world evidence supporting the use of advanced hybrid closed loop in poorly controlled type 1 diabetes patients.

IF 6.1 3区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Sophie Graf, Giulia Hofer, Ruth Hirschmann, Roger Lehmann, Claudia Cavelti-Weder
{"title":"Real-world evidence supporting the use of advanced hybrid closed loop in poorly controlled type 1 diabetes patients.","authors":"Sophie Graf, Giulia Hofer, Ruth Hirschmann, Roger Lehmann, Claudia Cavelti-Weder","doi":"10.1016/j.diabres.2025.112035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The advanced hybrid closed loop (a-HCL) algorithm includes automated basal and correction bolus insulin with customizable glucose targets. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a-HCL compared to predictive low glucose suspension (PLGS) and standard hybrid closed-loop (s-HCL) systems and to identify patient populations experiencing the greatest glycemic improvement after transitioning to a-HCL.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included type 1 diabetes patients at the University Hospital Zurich, Switzerland, who transitioned from PLGS or s-HCL to a-HCL between January 2020 and December 2021. Glycemic metrics, including HbA1c, time in range (TIR), time above range (TAR), time below range (TBR), sensor glucose (SG), and coefficient of variation (CV), were analyzed pre-and post-a-HCL implementation, considering clinical parameters influencing outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 71 patients, a-HCL implementation significantly reduced in HbA1c (7.2 ± 0.9 % to 6.8 ± 0.5 %, p < 0.001), SG (8.8 ± 1.4 mmol/L to 7.8 ± 0.8 mmol/L, p < 0.001), TAR (26.3 % to 17.3 %, p < 0.001) and increased TIR (68.5 % to 79.8 %, p < 0.001). TBR and CV showed no significant changes. Improvements were most pronounced in patients with higher baseline HbA1c, SG, CV and lower TIR, all indicators of poor glycemic control, and a BMI > 30 kg/m<sup>2</sup>.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings support a-HCL utilization across all patients, particularly in poorly controlled type 1 diabetes patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":11249,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes research and clinical practice","volume":" ","pages":"112035"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes research and clinical practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2025.112035","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The advanced hybrid closed loop (a-HCL) algorithm includes automated basal and correction bolus insulin with customizable glucose targets. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a-HCL compared to predictive low glucose suspension (PLGS) and standard hybrid closed-loop (s-HCL) systems and to identify patient populations experiencing the greatest glycemic improvement after transitioning to a-HCL.

Methods: This retrospective study included type 1 diabetes patients at the University Hospital Zurich, Switzerland, who transitioned from PLGS or s-HCL to a-HCL between January 2020 and December 2021. Glycemic metrics, including HbA1c, time in range (TIR), time above range (TAR), time below range (TBR), sensor glucose (SG), and coefficient of variation (CV), were analyzed pre-and post-a-HCL implementation, considering clinical parameters influencing outcomes.

Results: Among 71 patients, a-HCL implementation significantly reduced in HbA1c (7.2 ± 0.9 % to 6.8 ± 0.5 %, p < 0.001), SG (8.8 ± 1.4 mmol/L to 7.8 ± 0.8 mmol/L, p < 0.001), TAR (26.3 % to 17.3 %, p < 0.001) and increased TIR (68.5 % to 79.8 %, p < 0.001). TBR and CV showed no significant changes. Improvements were most pronounced in patients with higher baseline HbA1c, SG, CV and lower TIR, all indicators of poor glycemic control, and a BMI > 30 kg/m2.

Conclusions: Our findings support a-HCL utilization across all patients, particularly in poorly controlled type 1 diabetes patients.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Diabetes research and clinical practice
Diabetes research and clinical practice 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
3.90%
发文量
862
审稿时长
32 days
期刊介绍: Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice is an international journal for health-care providers and clinically oriented researchers that publishes high-quality original research articles and expert reviews in diabetes and related areas. The role of the journal is to provide a venue for dissemination of knowledge and discussion of topics related to diabetes clinical research and patient care. Topics of focus include translational science, genetics, immunology, nutrition, psychosocial research, epidemiology, prevention, socio-economic research, complications, new treatments, technologies and therapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信