Development of minimum data set and electronic registry for hemodialysis patients management.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICAL INFORMATICS
Mahtab Karami, Ehsan Nabovati, Nasim Mirpanahi
{"title":"Development of minimum data set and electronic registry for hemodialysis patients management.","authors":"Mahtab Karami, Ehsan Nabovati, Nasim Mirpanahi","doi":"10.1186/s12911-025-02914-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to develop a minimum dataset and an electronic registry system for hemodialysis patients to evaluate hemodialysis patients' treatment procedures and outcomes, conduct related research, and design therapeutic interventions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This developmental research was performed in multiple phases, including content determination using the Delphi technique; database designing using MySQL; building a user interface using PHP; usability evaluation using the think-aloud method by 10 evaluators through a scenario consisting of 7 tasks; and finally, the system was piloted by entering the 160 patients' paper records into the system.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Following the CVR and CVI content validity assessment, 108 of the 118 extracted data elements (DEs) were validated. Then, using the Delphi technique, nephrologists chose 57 DEs and divided them into 4 information categories, including the patient's clinical history, hemodialysis episodes, laboratory findings, and the outcomes of hemodialysis. The three tabs that made up the user interface were the homepage, information recording, reports, and definitions. The problems with appearance and performance were discovered using the think-aloud method, and they were then resolved. Finally, users had the opportunity to identify issues, improve the system's capabilities, and express their satisfaction throughout the system's three-month test period.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The E-hemodialysis registry was created based on knowledge gained from industrialized nations, opinions and suggestions from medical specialists, and the facilities that were accessible. Information from this system can be utilized as a starting point for evaluating the hemodialysis patients' status, identifying problems, and making sensible decisions for the best possible planning and management of end-stage renal disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":9340,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making","volume":"25 1","pages":"69"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11812217/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-025-02914-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICAL INFORMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to develop a minimum dataset and an electronic registry system for hemodialysis patients to evaluate hemodialysis patients' treatment procedures and outcomes, conduct related research, and design therapeutic interventions.

Methods: This developmental research was performed in multiple phases, including content determination using the Delphi technique; database designing using MySQL; building a user interface using PHP; usability evaluation using the think-aloud method by 10 evaluators through a scenario consisting of 7 tasks; and finally, the system was piloted by entering the 160 patients' paper records into the system.

Results: Following the CVR and CVI content validity assessment, 108 of the 118 extracted data elements (DEs) were validated. Then, using the Delphi technique, nephrologists chose 57 DEs and divided them into 4 information categories, including the patient's clinical history, hemodialysis episodes, laboratory findings, and the outcomes of hemodialysis. The three tabs that made up the user interface were the homepage, information recording, reports, and definitions. The problems with appearance and performance were discovered using the think-aloud method, and they were then resolved. Finally, users had the opportunity to identify issues, improve the system's capabilities, and express their satisfaction throughout the system's three-month test period.

Conclusions: The E-hemodialysis registry was created based on knowledge gained from industrialized nations, opinions and suggestions from medical specialists, and the facilities that were accessible. Information from this system can be utilized as a starting point for evaluating the hemodialysis patients' status, identifying problems, and making sensible decisions for the best possible planning and management of end-stage renal disease.

开发血液透析患者管理的最小数据集和电子注册表。
背景:本研究旨在建立血透患者的最小数据集和电子注册系统,以评估血透患者的治疗程序和结果,开展相关研究,并设计治疗干预措施。方法:本研究分多个阶段进行,包括采用德尔菲法测定含量;使用MySQL进行数据库设计;使用PHP构建用户界面;10名评估员通过由7个任务组成的场景,使用有声思考方法进行可用性评估;最后,通过将160名患者的书面记录输入系统,该系统进行了试点。结果:通过CVR和CVI内容效度评估,提取的118个数据元素(DEs)中有108个得到了验证。然后,肾内科医生采用德尔菲法(Delphi)选择57例de,并将其分为4类信息,包括患者的临床病史、血液透析事件、实验室检查结果和血液透析结局。组成用户界面的三个选项卡是主页、信息记录、报告和定义。使用“大声思考”的方法发现了外观和性能方面的问题,然后解决了这些问题。最后,用户有机会识别问题,改进系统的功能,并在整个系统的三个月测试期间表达他们的满意度。结论:电子血液透析登记处是根据从工业化国家获得的知识、医学专家的意见和建议以及可获得的设施建立的。该系统的信息可作为评估血液透析患者状况、识别问题、做出明智决策的起点,从而为终末期肾脏疾病的最佳规划和管理提供依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
5.70%
发文量
297
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in relation to the design, development, implementation, use, and evaluation of health information technologies and decision-making for human health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信