Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in traumatic brain injury after radiographic progression: a 6-year experience at a single Canadian Level 1 trauma Centre.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Melissa Lannon, Andrew Versolatto, Sunjay Sharma, Timothy Rice
{"title":"Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in traumatic brain injury after radiographic progression: a 6-year experience at a single Canadian Level 1 trauma Centre.","authors":"Melissa Lannon, Andrew Versolatto, Sunjay Sharma, Timothy Rice","doi":"10.1080/02688697.2025.2464731","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with traumatic brain injury are at high risk for venous thromboembolism. Therefore, pharmacological prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism has become critical in managing trauma patients. Unfortunately, the decision to initiate prophylaxis in patients with radiographic progression must be carefully weighed against the risk of further progression of intracranial haemorrhage, with little evidence to support decision-making.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review was performed at a Canadian Level 1 Trauma Centre from 2011-2017. Included adult patients had evidence of radiographic intracranial haemorrhage progression on repeat CT, and patients receiving prophylaxis were compared with those not having received prophylaxis. Regression analyses were performed to determine the decision-making process for providers when caring for these patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>242 patients were included in the study, with 33.1% of these patients not receiving pharmacological prophylaxis during admission. Of those without prophylaxis, 1.2% developed deep vein thromboses, no patients with pulmonary emboli, compared with five patients in the prophylaxis group with pulmonary emboli. The probability of not receiving prophylaxis was higher if abbreviated injury score is greater or equal to 4, decreased in cases of pelvic fracture or solid organ injury, or if the patient required an operative procedure.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with isolated, non-operative severe traumatic brain injury may be at risk of not receiving pharmacologic prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism during hospital admission. This decision may place patients at greater risk of venous thromboembolism, and thereby increased morbidity and mortality. As such, further investigation and initiatives to improve pharmacologic prophylaxis in this patient population is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":9261,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02688697.2025.2464731","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Patients with traumatic brain injury are at high risk for venous thromboembolism. Therefore, pharmacological prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism has become critical in managing trauma patients. Unfortunately, the decision to initiate prophylaxis in patients with radiographic progression must be carefully weighed against the risk of further progression of intracranial haemorrhage, with little evidence to support decision-making.

Methods: A retrospective review was performed at a Canadian Level 1 Trauma Centre from 2011-2017. Included adult patients had evidence of radiographic intracranial haemorrhage progression on repeat CT, and patients receiving prophylaxis were compared with those not having received prophylaxis. Regression analyses were performed to determine the decision-making process for providers when caring for these patients.

Results: 242 patients were included in the study, with 33.1% of these patients not receiving pharmacological prophylaxis during admission. Of those without prophylaxis, 1.2% developed deep vein thromboses, no patients with pulmonary emboli, compared with five patients in the prophylaxis group with pulmonary emboli. The probability of not receiving prophylaxis was higher if abbreviated injury score is greater or equal to 4, decreased in cases of pelvic fracture or solid organ injury, or if the patient required an operative procedure.

Conclusion: Patients with isolated, non-operative severe traumatic brain injury may be at risk of not receiving pharmacologic prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism during hospital admission. This decision may place patients at greater risk of venous thromboembolism, and thereby increased morbidity and mortality. As such, further investigation and initiatives to improve pharmacologic prophylaxis in this patient population is warranted.

脑外伤放射学进展后的静脉血栓栓塞预防:加拿大一家一级创伤中心的 6 年经验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
British Journal of Neurosurgery
British Journal of Neurosurgery 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
139
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Neurosurgery is a leading international forum for debate in the field of neurosurgery, publishing original peer-reviewed articles of the highest quality, along with comment and correspondence on all topics of current interest to neurosurgeons worldwide. Coverage includes all aspects of case assessment and surgical practice, as well as wide-ranging research, with an emphasis on clinical rather than experimental material. Special emphasis is placed on postgraduate education with review articles on basic neurosciences and on the theory behind advances in techniques, investigation and clinical management. All papers are submitted to rigorous and independent peer-review, ensuring the journal’s wide citation and its appearance in the major abstracting and indexing services.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信