Influence of best objective response to first-line treatment on survival outcomes in advanced urothelial carcinoma in the era of sequential therapy with enfortumab vedotin.

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Kohei Kobatake, Keisuke Goto, Yuki Sakamoto, Kyohsuke Iwane, Kensuke Nishida, Kunihiro Hashimoto, Akihiro Asami, Hideo Iwamoto, Tetsutaro Hayashi, Kenshiro Takemoto, Miki Naito, Shunsuke Miyamoto, Yohei Sekino, Hiroyuki Kitano, Akihiro Goriki, Keisuke Hieda, Nobuyuki Hinata
{"title":"Influence of best objective response to first-line treatment on survival outcomes in advanced urothelial carcinoma in the era of sequential therapy with enfortumab vedotin.","authors":"Kohei Kobatake, Keisuke Goto, Yuki Sakamoto, Kyohsuke Iwane, Kensuke Nishida, Kunihiro Hashimoto, Akihiro Asami, Hideo Iwamoto, Tetsutaro Hayashi, Kenshiro Takemoto, Miki Naito, Shunsuke Miyamoto, Yohei Sekino, Hiroyuki Kitano, Akihiro Goriki, Keisuke Hieda, Nobuyuki Hinata","doi":"10.1111/iju.15686","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study evaluated whether first-line treatment affects survival outcomes in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma undergoing sequential therapy with chemotherapy, immune checkpoint inhibitors, and enfortumab vedotin.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multicenter retrospective study included 57 patients treated at Hiroshima University Hospital and its affiliated institutions between 2009 and 2024. Patients received chemotherapy as a first-line treatment (gemcitabine plus cisplatin or carboplatin), followed by second-line immune checkpoint inhibitors (pembrolizumab or avelumab) and third-line enfortumab vedotin. Assessed outcomes included overall survival and time to treatment failure. Cox regression analysis identified prognostic factors for overall survival.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over a median follow-up of 20.5 months, median overall survival was not reached after first-line treatment. Gemcitabine with cisplatin was selected in 31.6% of cases, while gemcitabine and carboplatin was chosen in 68.4% of cases as the first-line treatment; subsequently, 66.7% received pembrolizumab, and 33.3% received avelumab in the second-line treatment. Patients who achieved a complete or partial response with the first-line treatment had significantly longer overall survivals from both first-line and enfortumab vedotin initiation than those with stable or progressive disease. In cases that achieved complete or partial responses, avelumab was more frequently selected as a second-line therapy. However, in the first-line treatment, multivariate analysis identified only stable or progressive disease as a significant predictor of worse overall survival.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The best response to first-line treatment predicted both overall survival from first-line initiation and outcomes following enfortumab vedotin treatment, underscoring its prognostic value in sequential therapy for patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma.</p>","PeriodicalId":14323,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Urology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/iju.15686","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study evaluated whether first-line treatment affects survival outcomes in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma undergoing sequential therapy with chemotherapy, immune checkpoint inhibitors, and enfortumab vedotin.

Methods: This multicenter retrospective study included 57 patients treated at Hiroshima University Hospital and its affiliated institutions between 2009 and 2024. Patients received chemotherapy as a first-line treatment (gemcitabine plus cisplatin or carboplatin), followed by second-line immune checkpoint inhibitors (pembrolizumab or avelumab) and third-line enfortumab vedotin. Assessed outcomes included overall survival and time to treatment failure. Cox regression analysis identified prognostic factors for overall survival.

Results: Over a median follow-up of 20.5 months, median overall survival was not reached after first-line treatment. Gemcitabine with cisplatin was selected in 31.6% of cases, while gemcitabine and carboplatin was chosen in 68.4% of cases as the first-line treatment; subsequently, 66.7% received pembrolizumab, and 33.3% received avelumab in the second-line treatment. Patients who achieved a complete or partial response with the first-line treatment had significantly longer overall survivals from both first-line and enfortumab vedotin initiation than those with stable or progressive disease. In cases that achieved complete or partial responses, avelumab was more frequently selected as a second-line therapy. However, in the first-line treatment, multivariate analysis identified only stable or progressive disease as a significant predictor of worse overall survival.

Conclusion: The best response to first-line treatment predicted both overall survival from first-line initiation and outcomes following enfortumab vedotin treatment, underscoring its prognostic value in sequential therapy for patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Urology
International Journal of Urology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
11.50%
发文量
340
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: International Journal of Urology is the official English language journal of the Japanese Urological Association, publishing articles of scientific excellence in urology. Submissions of papers from all countries are considered for publication. All manuscripts are subject to peer review and are judged on the basis of their contribution of original data and ideas or interpretation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信