Predicting metabolic syndrome by lipid accumulation product, visceral adiposity index and body roundness index in Brazilian rural workers.

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Júlia Rabelo Santos Ferreira, Manoela Cassa Libardi, Camila Bruneli do Prado, Eliana Zandonade, Olívia Maria de Paula Alves Bezerra, Luciane Bresciani Salaroli
{"title":"Predicting metabolic syndrome by lipid accumulation product, visceral adiposity index and body roundness index in Brazilian rural workers.","authors":"Júlia Rabelo Santos Ferreira, Manoela Cassa Libardi, Camila Bruneli do Prado, Eliana Zandonade, Olívia Maria de Paula Alves Bezerra, Luciane Bresciani Salaroli","doi":"10.1186/s12889-025-21624-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Anthropometric indicators, such as the Lipid Accumulation Product (LAP), the Visceral Adiposity Index (VAI), and the Body Roundness Index (BRI), could be valuable tools for identifying metabolic syndrome (MS) in rural populations because of their simplicity, low cost, and ability to identify central obesity and related metabolic risks where access to healthcare is limited. This study aimed to evaluate the predictive capacity of three anthropometric indices for identifying MS in a representative sample of rural workers in Espírito Santo, Brazil.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional analysis was conducted, and the diagnostic performance of these indices was assessed via ROC curves under the NCEP and IDF criteria for MS. The study involved 806 participants, aged 18-59 years, and the data collection included anthropometric measurements, biochemical tests, and blood pressure assessments.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results showed that LAP had the highest discriminatory capacity for MS under both diagnostic criteria, with AUCs of 0.803 (NCEP) and 0.885 (IDF), followed by BRI and VAI. The cutoff points identified for LAP were 33.84 (NCEP) and 26.80 (IDF), with high sensitivity and specificity. The BRI also demonstrated strong predictive power with AUC values above 0.7, whereas the VAI had the lowest AUC among the indices but remained a useful predictor. The correlations between the indices and MS components highlighted significant relationships, especially between LAP and triglycerides (r = 0.830).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This is the first study to determine cutoff points for these indices in a rural Brazilian population, suggesting that LAP and BRI are reliable tools for MS screening. The low cost of these methods could aid in improving healthcare accessibility and prevention strategies in rural areas with limited resources. Future research is recommended to validate these findings in other populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":9039,"journal":{"name":"BMC Public Health","volume":"25 1","pages":"544"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-025-21624-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Anthropometric indicators, such as the Lipid Accumulation Product (LAP), the Visceral Adiposity Index (VAI), and the Body Roundness Index (BRI), could be valuable tools for identifying metabolic syndrome (MS) in rural populations because of their simplicity, low cost, and ability to identify central obesity and related metabolic risks where access to healthcare is limited. This study aimed to evaluate the predictive capacity of three anthropometric indices for identifying MS in a representative sample of rural workers in Espírito Santo, Brazil.

Methods: A cross-sectional analysis was conducted, and the diagnostic performance of these indices was assessed via ROC curves under the NCEP and IDF criteria for MS. The study involved 806 participants, aged 18-59 years, and the data collection included anthropometric measurements, biochemical tests, and blood pressure assessments.

Results: The results showed that LAP had the highest discriminatory capacity for MS under both diagnostic criteria, with AUCs of 0.803 (NCEP) and 0.885 (IDF), followed by BRI and VAI. The cutoff points identified for LAP were 33.84 (NCEP) and 26.80 (IDF), with high sensitivity and specificity. The BRI also demonstrated strong predictive power with AUC values above 0.7, whereas the VAI had the lowest AUC among the indices but remained a useful predictor. The correlations between the indices and MS components highlighted significant relationships, especially between LAP and triglycerides (r = 0.830).

Conclusions: This is the first study to determine cutoff points for these indices in a rural Brazilian population, suggesting that LAP and BRI are reliable tools for MS screening. The low cost of these methods could aid in improving healthcare accessibility and prevention strategies in rural areas with limited resources. Future research is recommended to validate these findings in other populations.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Public Health
BMC Public Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
4.40%
发文量
2108
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: BMC Public Health is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on the epidemiology of disease and the understanding of all aspects of public health. The journal has a special focus on the social determinants of health, the environmental, behavioral, and occupational correlates of health and disease, and the impact of health policies, practices and interventions on the community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信