Improving sepsis mortality prediction with machine learning: A comparative study of advanced classifiers and performance metrics.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Puyu Zhou, Jiazheng Duan, Jianqing Li
{"title":"Improving sepsis mortality prediction with machine learning: A comparative study of advanced classifiers and performance metrics.","authors":"Puyu Zhou, Jiazheng Duan, Jianqing Li","doi":"10.17219/acem/194660","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>High sepsis mortality rates pose a serious global health problem. Machine learning is a promising technique with the potential to improve mortality prediction for this disease in an accurate and timely manner.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to develop a model capable of rapidly and accurately predicting sepsis mortality using data that can be quickly obtained in an ambulance, with a focus on practical application during ambulance transport.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Data from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care-IV (MIMIC-IV) dataset were used to compare the performance of 11 machine learning algorithms against the widely utilized quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) score. A dynamic updating model was implemented. Performance was evaluated using area under the curve (AUC) and precision-recall area under the curve (PRAUC) scores, and feature importance was assessed with SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) values.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The light gradient boosting machine (LightGBM) model achieved the highest AUC (0.79) and PRAUC (0.44) scores, outperforming the qSOFA score (AUC = 0.76, PRAUC = 0.40). The LightGBM also achieved the highest PRAUC (0.44), followed by Optuna_LightGBM (0.43) and random forest (0.42). The dynamically updated and tuned model further improved performance metrics (AUC = 0.79, PRAUC = 0.44) compared to the base model (AUC = 0.76, PRAUC = 0.39). Feature importance analysis offers clinicians insights for prioritizing patient assessments and interventions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The LightGBM-based model demonstrated superior performance in predicting sepsis-related mortality in an ambulance setting. This study underscores the practical applicability of machine learning models, addressing the limitations of previous research, and highlights the importance of real-time updates and hyperparameter tuning in optimizing model performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":7306,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17219/acem/194660","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: High sepsis mortality rates pose a serious global health problem. Machine learning is a promising technique with the potential to improve mortality prediction for this disease in an accurate and timely manner.

Objectives: This study aimed to develop a model capable of rapidly and accurately predicting sepsis mortality using data that can be quickly obtained in an ambulance, with a focus on practical application during ambulance transport.

Material and methods: Data from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care-IV (MIMIC-IV) dataset were used to compare the performance of 11 machine learning algorithms against the widely utilized quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) score. A dynamic updating model was implemented. Performance was evaluated using area under the curve (AUC) and precision-recall area under the curve (PRAUC) scores, and feature importance was assessed with SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) values.

Results: The light gradient boosting machine (LightGBM) model achieved the highest AUC (0.79) and PRAUC (0.44) scores, outperforming the qSOFA score (AUC = 0.76, PRAUC = 0.40). The LightGBM also achieved the highest PRAUC (0.44), followed by Optuna_LightGBM (0.43) and random forest (0.42). The dynamically updated and tuned model further improved performance metrics (AUC = 0.79, PRAUC = 0.44) compared to the base model (AUC = 0.76, PRAUC = 0.39). Feature importance analysis offers clinicians insights for prioritizing patient assessments and interventions.

Conclusions: The LightGBM-based model demonstrated superior performance in predicting sepsis-related mortality in an ambulance setting. This study underscores the practical applicability of machine learning models, addressing the limitations of previous research, and highlights the importance of real-time updates and hyperparameter tuning in optimizing model performance.

用机器学习改进败血症死亡率预测:高级分类器和性能指标的比较研究。
背景:脓毒症的高死亡率是一个严重的全球健康问题。机器学习是一种很有前途的技术,有可能以准确和及时的方式提高对这种疾病的死亡率预测。目的:本研究旨在建立一种能够快速准确预测脓毒症死亡率的模型,利用救护车上可以快速获得的数据,重点关注救护车运输过程中的实际应用。材料和方法:使用重症监护医学信息市场- iv (MIMIC-IV)数据集的数据,将11种机器学习算法的性能与广泛使用的快速顺序器官衰竭评估(qSOFA)评分进行比较。实现了动态更新模型。使用曲线下面积(AUC)和曲线下精确召回面积(PRAUC)评分评估性能,使用SHapley加性解释(SHAP)值评估特征重要性。结果:光梯度增强机(LightGBM)模型获得最高的AUC(0.79)和PRAUC(0.44)评分,优于qSOFA评分(AUC = 0.76, PRAUC = 0.40)。PRAUC最高的是LightGBM(0.44),其次是Optuna_LightGBM(0.43)和random forest(0.42)。与基础模型(AUC = 0.76, PRAUC = 0.39)相比,动态更新和调整的模型进一步提高了性能指标(AUC = 0.79, PRAUC = 0.44)。特征重要性分析为临床医生优先考虑患者评估和干预提供了见解。结论:基于lightgbm的模型在预测败血症相关死亡率方面表现优异。本研究强调了机器学习模型的实际适用性,解决了以往研究的局限性,并强调了实时更新和超参数调优在优化模型性能中的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine
Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
153
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine has been published by the Wroclaw Medical University since 1992. Establishing the medical journal was the idea of Prof. Bogumił Halawa, Chair of the Department of Cardiology, and was fully supported by the Rector of Wroclaw Medical University, Prof. Zbigniew Knapik. Prof. Halawa was also the first editor-in-chief, between 1992-1997. The journal, then entitled "Postępy Medycyny Klinicznej i Doświadczalnej", appeared quarterly. Prof. Leszek Paradowski was editor-in-chief from 1997-1999. In 1998 he initiated alterations in the profile and cover design of the journal which were accepted by the Editorial Board. The title was changed to Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine. Articles in English were welcomed. A number of outstanding representatives of medical science from Poland and abroad were invited to participate in the newly established International Editorial Staff. Prof. Antonina Harłozińska-Szmyrka was editor-in-chief in years 2000-2005, in years 2006-2007 once again prof. Leszek Paradowski and prof. Maria Podolak-Dawidziak was editor-in-chief in years 2008-2016. Since 2017 the editor-in chief is prof. Maciej Bagłaj. Since July 2005, original papers have been published only in English. Case reports are no longer accepted. The manuscripts are reviewed by two independent reviewers and a statistical reviewer, and English texts are proofread by a native speaker. The journal has been indexed in several databases: Scopus, Ulrich’sTM International Periodicals Directory, Index Copernicus and since 2007 in Thomson Reuters databases: Science Citation Index Expanded i Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition. In 2010 the journal obtained Impact Factor which is now 1.179 pts. Articles published in the journal are worth 15 points among Polish journals according to the Polish Committee for Scientific Research and 169.43 points according to the Index Copernicus. Since November 7, 2012, Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine has been indexed and included in National Library of Medicine’s MEDLINE database. English abstracts printed in the journal are included and searchable using PubMed http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信