The formation and evolution of the Earth’s inner core

Alfred J. Wilson, Christopher J. Davies, Andrew M. Walker, Monica Pozzo, Dario Alfè, Arwen Deuss
{"title":"The formation and evolution of the Earth’s inner core","authors":"Alfred J. Wilson, Christopher J. Davies, Andrew M. Walker, Monica Pozzo, Dario Alfè, Arwen Deuss","doi":"10.1038/s43017-024-00639-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The growth of the solid inner core from the liquid outer core provides crucial power for generating the geomagnetic field. However, the traditional view of inner core growth does not include the physical requirement that liquids must be supercooled below the melting point before freezing can begin. In this Review, we explore the impact of supercooling the Earth’s core on inner core formation, growth and dynamics, and the interpretation of seismic and palaeomagnetic observations. Mineral physics calculations suggest that at least 450 K of supercooling is needed to spontaneously nucleate the inner core. However, when satisfying inferences from geophysical constraints, the maximum available supercooling is estimated at 420 K and more probably <100 K. Supercooling the Earth’s core requires that the inner core had at least two growth regimes. The first regime is a rapid phase that freezes supercooled liquids at rates comparable to outer core dynamics (cm yr−1), followed by the second regime that is a traditional in-equilibrium growth phase proportional to the cooling rate of the core (mm yr−1). Future research should seek evidence for rapid growth in the palaeomagnetic and seismic records and the mechanisms that produce deformation texture, particularly those owing to heterogeneous inner core growth, inner core convection, and coupling between freezing and the magnetic field. Nucleation and growth of Earth’s solid inner core has a crucial role powering the geomagnetic field. This Review explores the timing and mechanisms of inner core growth consistent with physical constraints and first-order observations of the thermal evolution of Earth.","PeriodicalId":18921,"journal":{"name":"Nature Reviews Earth & Environment","volume":"6 2","pages":"140-154"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature Reviews Earth & Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s43017-024-00639-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The growth of the solid inner core from the liquid outer core provides crucial power for generating the geomagnetic field. However, the traditional view of inner core growth does not include the physical requirement that liquids must be supercooled below the melting point before freezing can begin. In this Review, we explore the impact of supercooling the Earth’s core on inner core formation, growth and dynamics, and the interpretation of seismic and palaeomagnetic observations. Mineral physics calculations suggest that at least 450 K of supercooling is needed to spontaneously nucleate the inner core. However, when satisfying inferences from geophysical constraints, the maximum available supercooling is estimated at 420 K and more probably <100 K. Supercooling the Earth’s core requires that the inner core had at least two growth regimes. The first regime is a rapid phase that freezes supercooled liquids at rates comparable to outer core dynamics (cm yr−1), followed by the second regime that is a traditional in-equilibrium growth phase proportional to the cooling rate of the core (mm yr−1). Future research should seek evidence for rapid growth in the palaeomagnetic and seismic records and the mechanisms that produce deformation texture, particularly those owing to heterogeneous inner core growth, inner core convection, and coupling between freezing and the magnetic field. Nucleation and growth of Earth’s solid inner core has a crucial role powering the geomagnetic field. This Review explores the timing and mechanisms of inner core growth consistent with physical constraints and first-order observations of the thermal evolution of Earth.

Abstract Image

地球内核的形成和演化
固态内核从液态外核中生长出来,为地磁场的产生提供了至关重要的动力。然而,关于内核生长的传统观点并不包括液体在开始冻结之前必须过冷到熔点以下这一物理要求。在这篇综述中,我们探讨了地核过冷对地核形成、生长和动力学的影响,以及对地震和古地磁观测的解释。矿物物理计算表明,至少需要450k的过冷才能使内核自发成核。然而,当满足地球物理约束的推断时,估计最大可用过冷度为420 K,更可能为100 K。地核的过冷要求地核至少有两种生长机制。第一个阶段是一个快速阶段,以与外核动力学相当的速率(cm yr - 1)冻结过冷液体,其次是第二个阶段,这是一个传统的与核心冷却速率成比例的平衡生长阶段(mm yr - 1)。未来的研究应寻求古地磁和地震记录快速增长的证据,以及形变结构产生的机制,特别是由于内核的非均匀生长、内核对流和冻结与磁场的耦合造成的形变结构。地球固体内核的成核和生长对地磁场的动力起着至关重要的作用。本文根据地球热演化的一阶观测和物理约束,探讨了内核生长的时间和机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信