Peri-Implant Health and Perfusion Parameters in Patients After Microvascular Jaw Reconstruction: A Clinical Cohort Study

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Marie Sophie Katz, Mark Ooms, Marius Heitzer, Anna Bock, Nils Vohl, Kristian Kniha, Frank Hölzle, Ali Modabber
{"title":"Peri-Implant Health and Perfusion Parameters in Patients After Microvascular Jaw Reconstruction: A Clinical Cohort Study","authors":"Marie Sophie Katz,&nbsp;Mark Ooms,&nbsp;Marius Heitzer,&nbsp;Anna Bock,&nbsp;Nils Vohl,&nbsp;Kristian Kniha,&nbsp;Frank Hölzle,&nbsp;Ali Modabber","doi":"10.1111/cid.70012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>The aim of this study was to evaluate perfusion parameters and clinical features of healthy implants and implants affected by peri-implant disease in patients who had undergone microvascular jaw reconstruction.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 25 patients with 92 implants placed in microvascular transplants were included. Of these, 68 implants showed healthy peri-implant tissue, 12 were affected by peri-implant mucositis, and 12 were diagnosed with peri-implantitis. Peri-implant perfusion was measured mesially and distally at the implant shoulder using laser Doppler flowmetry and tissue spectrophotometry (LDF-TS), followed by a clinical evaluation, including measurement of probing depths, bleeding on probing (BOP), plaque index, biotype, type of implant, the restoration and the presence of keratinized tissue. Perfusion parameters were compared between the healthy implants and the implants with peri-implant disease based on the conventional BOP–based diagnosis of peri-implantitis, and the associations between the perfusion values and clinical measurements were analyzed. Optimal cut-off values for predicting peri-implantitis were calculated with receiver operating characteristics.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The mean relative amount of hemoglobin and mean blood flow were significantly different between healthy implants and implants with peri-implant mucositis and peri-implantitis (<i>p</i> = 0.003 and <i>p</i> = 0.002, respectively). However, there are interindividual differences that appear to influence blood flow values as well. When a linear mixed regression model was applied, including the patient as a random variable, the difference in blood flow was no longer statistically significant (<i>p</i> = 0.400). Still, the optimal cut-off value of mean blood flow for predicting peri-implantitis was determined to be &gt; 46.5 AU (AUC = 0.788; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001; CI = 0.695–0.881; sensitivity = 1.00, specificity = 0.60).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Implants in microvascular flaps are particularly vulnerable to peri-implant disease. Risk factors are the lack of keratinized peri-implant tissue, fixed restorations, bone-level implants, and high plaque levels.</p>\n \n <p>As a noninvasive and objective method, LDF-TS can contribute to risk assessment by evaluating perfusion parameters and help detect the early onset of peri-implant disease.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50679,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/cid.70012","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cid.70012","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

The aim of this study was to evaluate perfusion parameters and clinical features of healthy implants and implants affected by peri-implant disease in patients who had undergone microvascular jaw reconstruction.

Methods

A total of 25 patients with 92 implants placed in microvascular transplants were included. Of these, 68 implants showed healthy peri-implant tissue, 12 were affected by peri-implant mucositis, and 12 were diagnosed with peri-implantitis. Peri-implant perfusion was measured mesially and distally at the implant shoulder using laser Doppler flowmetry and tissue spectrophotometry (LDF-TS), followed by a clinical evaluation, including measurement of probing depths, bleeding on probing (BOP), plaque index, biotype, type of implant, the restoration and the presence of keratinized tissue. Perfusion parameters were compared between the healthy implants and the implants with peri-implant disease based on the conventional BOP–based diagnosis of peri-implantitis, and the associations between the perfusion values and clinical measurements were analyzed. Optimal cut-off values for predicting peri-implantitis were calculated with receiver operating characteristics.

Results

The mean relative amount of hemoglobin and mean blood flow were significantly different between healthy implants and implants with peri-implant mucositis and peri-implantitis (p = 0.003 and p = 0.002, respectively). However, there are interindividual differences that appear to influence blood flow values as well. When a linear mixed regression model was applied, including the patient as a random variable, the difference in blood flow was no longer statistically significant (p = 0.400). Still, the optimal cut-off value of mean blood flow for predicting peri-implantitis was determined to be > 46.5 AU (AUC = 0.788; p < 0.001; CI = 0.695–0.881; sensitivity = 1.00, specificity = 0.60).

Conclusion

Implants in microvascular flaps are particularly vulnerable to peri-implant disease. Risk factors are the lack of keratinized peri-implant tissue, fixed restorations, bone-level implants, and high plaque levels.

As a noninvasive and objective method, LDF-TS can contribute to risk assessment by evaluating perfusion parameters and help detect the early onset of peri-implant disease.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
13.90%
发文量
103
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The goal of Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research is to advance the scientific and technical aspects relating to dental implants and related scientific subjects. Dissemination of new and evolving information related to dental implants and the related science is the primary goal of our journal. The range of topics covered by the journals will include but be not limited to: New scientific developments relating to bone Implant surfaces and their relationship to the surrounding tissues Computer aided implant designs Computer aided prosthetic designs Immediate implant loading Immediate implant placement Materials relating to bone induction and conduction New surgical methods relating to implant placement New materials and methods relating to implant restorations Methods for determining implant stability A primary focus of the journal is publication of evidenced based articles evaluating to new dental implants, techniques and multicenter studies evaluating these treatments. In addition basic science research relating to wound healing and osseointegration will be an important focus for the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信