On the Design of Islamic Blended Microfinancing for Refugee Entrepreneurship: An Institutional Logic Perspective

IF 2.2 3区 社会学 Q1 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
Wahyu Jatmiko, A. Azizon, Raditya Sukmana
{"title":"On the Design of Islamic Blended Microfinancing for Refugee Entrepreneurship: An Institutional Logic Perspective","authors":"Wahyu Jatmiko,&nbsp;A. Azizon,&nbsp;Raditya Sukmana","doi":"10.1111/1758-5899.13475","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Uncovering apt policy for refugee self-reliance is intricate. Refugee entrepreneurship is often hailed as the way forward for such an objective as it deciphers ‘Canvas Ceiling’. However, the lack of financing for <i>unfeasible</i> and <i>unbankable</i> refugee entrepreneurs prevents this from materialising. This article proposes Islamic blended microfinance for refugee entrepreneurship, integrating state support, the private sector, the philanthropic funds, and Islamic values. Our model differs as it is developed through the lens of the competing logic discussed in the institutional theory. Understanding competing institutional logic is crucial as blended finance involves various agents with distinct moral preferences that are often overlooked by policymakers. We test our model in the spatial context of Indonesia, the home of microfinance and blended Islamic finance. The findings outline that the logics of the three agents and religion (Islam) can converge in contextuality and temporality dimensions. A key to attaining this equilibrium is to meticulously design the payoff between the private sector with market logic and the philanthropic institutions with universal community logic, making them contingent on the state of the economy.</p>","PeriodicalId":51510,"journal":{"name":"Global Policy","volume":"16 S1","pages":"25-37"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1758-5899.13475","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1758-5899.13475","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Uncovering apt policy for refugee self-reliance is intricate. Refugee entrepreneurship is often hailed as the way forward for such an objective as it deciphers ‘Canvas Ceiling’. However, the lack of financing for unfeasible and unbankable refugee entrepreneurs prevents this from materialising. This article proposes Islamic blended microfinance for refugee entrepreneurship, integrating state support, the private sector, the philanthropic funds, and Islamic values. Our model differs as it is developed through the lens of the competing logic discussed in the institutional theory. Understanding competing institutional logic is crucial as blended finance involves various agents with distinct moral preferences that are often overlooked by policymakers. We test our model in the spatial context of Indonesia, the home of microfinance and blended Islamic finance. The findings outline that the logics of the three agents and religion (Islam) can converge in contextuality and temporality dimensions. A key to attaining this equilibrium is to meticulously design the payoff between the private sector with market logic and the philanthropic institutions with universal community logic, making them contingent on the state of the economy.

Abstract Image

难民创业的伊斯兰混合小额信贷设计:制度逻辑视角
为难民自力更生制定合适的政策是一件复杂的事情。难民创业通常被誉为实现这一目标的前进道路,因为它破译了“帆布天花板”。然而,由于缺乏对不可行和无银行担保的难民企业家的资助,这一目标无法实现。本文建议为难民创业提供伊斯兰混合小额信贷,将国家支持、私营部门、慈善基金和伊斯兰价值观结合起来。我们的模型的不同之处在于,它是通过制度理论中讨论的竞争逻辑的镜头发展起来的。理解相互竞争的制度逻辑至关重要,因为混合金融涉及具有不同道德偏好的各种行为主体,而这些行为主体往往被政策制定者所忽视。我们在印度尼西亚的空间背景下测试了我们的模型,印度尼西亚是小额信贷和混合伊斯兰金融的发源地。研究结果概述了三个主体和宗教(伊斯兰教)的逻辑可以在情境性和时间性维度上收敛。实现这一平衡的关键是精心设计符合市场逻辑的私营部门与符合普遍社区逻辑的慈善机构之间的收益,使其取决于经济状况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Global Policy
Global Policy Multiple-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
10.50%
发文量
125
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信