Head Motion in Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Quantification, Mitigation, and Structural Associations in Large, Cross-Sectional Datasets Across the Lifespan

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 NEUROIMAGING
Kurt G. Schilling, Karthik Ramadass, Viljami Sairanen, Michael E. Kim, Francois Rheault, Nancy Newlin, Tin Nguyen, Laura Barquero, Micah D'archangel, Chenyu Gao, Ema Topolnjak, Nazirah Mohd Khairi, Derek Archer, Lori L. Beason-Held, Susan M. Resnick, Timothy Hohman, Laurie Cutting, Julie Schneider, Lisa L. Barnes, David A. Bennett, Konstantinos Arfanakis, Sophia Vinci-Booher, Marilyn Albert, The BIOCARD Study Team, The Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI), Aging Brain: Vasculature, Ischemia, and Behavior (ABVIB), Daniel Moyer, Bennett A. Landman
{"title":"Head Motion in Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Quantification, Mitigation, and Structural Associations in Large, Cross-Sectional Datasets Across the Lifespan","authors":"Kurt G. Schilling,&nbsp;Karthik Ramadass,&nbsp;Viljami Sairanen,&nbsp;Michael E. Kim,&nbsp;Francois Rheault,&nbsp;Nancy Newlin,&nbsp;Tin Nguyen,&nbsp;Laura Barquero,&nbsp;Micah D'archangel,&nbsp;Chenyu Gao,&nbsp;Ema Topolnjak,&nbsp;Nazirah Mohd Khairi,&nbsp;Derek Archer,&nbsp;Lori L. Beason-Held,&nbsp;Susan M. Resnick,&nbsp;Timothy Hohman,&nbsp;Laurie Cutting,&nbsp;Julie Schneider,&nbsp;Lisa L. Barnes,&nbsp;David A. Bennett,&nbsp;Konstantinos Arfanakis,&nbsp;Sophia Vinci-Booher,&nbsp;Marilyn Albert,&nbsp;The BIOCARD Study Team,&nbsp;The Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI),&nbsp;Aging Brain: Vasculature, Ischemia, and Behavior (ABVIB),&nbsp;Daniel Moyer,&nbsp;Bennett A. Landman","doi":"10.1002/hbm.70143","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Head motion during diffusion magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans can cause numerous artifacts and biases subsequent quantification. However, a thorough characterization of motion across multiple scans, cohorts, and consortiums has not been performed. To address this, we designed a study with three aims. First, we aimed to characterize subject motion across several large cohorts, utilizing 13 cohorts comprised of 16,995 imaging sessions (age 0.1–100 years, mean age = 63 years; 7220 females; 3175 cognitively impaired adults; 471 developmentally delayed children) to describe the magnitude and directions of subject movement. Second, we aimed to investigate whether state-of-the-art diffusion preprocessing pipelines mitigate biases in quantitative measures of microstructure and connectivity by taking advantage of datasets with scan-rescan acquisitions and ask whether there are detectable differences between the same subjects when scans and rescans have differing levels of motion. Third, we aimed to investigate whether there are structural connectivity differences between movers and non-movers. We found that (1) subjects typically move 1–2 mm/min with most motion as translation in the anterior–posterior direction and rotation around the right–left axis; (2) Modern preprocessing pipelines can effectively mitigate motion to the point where biases are not detectable with current analysis techniques; and (3) There are no apparent differences in microstructure or macrostructural connections in participants who exhibit high motion versus those that exhibit low motion. Overall, characterizing motion magnitude and directions, as well as motion correlates, informs and improves motion mitigation strategies and image processing pipelines.</p>","PeriodicalId":13019,"journal":{"name":"Human Brain Mapping","volume":"46 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hbm.70143","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Brain Mapping","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hbm.70143","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROIMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Head motion during diffusion magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans can cause numerous artifacts and biases subsequent quantification. However, a thorough characterization of motion across multiple scans, cohorts, and consortiums has not been performed. To address this, we designed a study with three aims. First, we aimed to characterize subject motion across several large cohorts, utilizing 13 cohorts comprised of 16,995 imaging sessions (age 0.1–100 years, mean age = 63 years; 7220 females; 3175 cognitively impaired adults; 471 developmentally delayed children) to describe the magnitude and directions of subject movement. Second, we aimed to investigate whether state-of-the-art diffusion preprocessing pipelines mitigate biases in quantitative measures of microstructure and connectivity by taking advantage of datasets with scan-rescan acquisitions and ask whether there are detectable differences between the same subjects when scans and rescans have differing levels of motion. Third, we aimed to investigate whether there are structural connectivity differences between movers and non-movers. We found that (1) subjects typically move 1–2 mm/min with most motion as translation in the anterior–posterior direction and rotation around the right–left axis; (2) Modern preprocessing pipelines can effectively mitigate motion to the point where biases are not detectable with current analysis techniques; and (3) There are no apparent differences in microstructure or macrostructural connections in participants who exhibit high motion versus those that exhibit low motion. Overall, characterizing motion magnitude and directions, as well as motion correlates, informs and improves motion mitigation strategies and image processing pipelines.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Human Brain Mapping
Human Brain Mapping 医学-核医学
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
401
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Human Brain Mapping publishes peer-reviewed basic, clinical, technical, and theoretical research in the interdisciplinary and rapidly expanding field of human brain mapping. The journal features research derived from non-invasive brain imaging modalities used to explore the spatial and temporal organization of the neural systems supporting human behavior. Imaging modalities of interest include positron emission tomography, event-related potentials, electro-and magnetoencephalography, magnetic resonance imaging, and single-photon emission tomography. Brain mapping research in both normal and clinical populations is encouraged. Article formats include Research Articles, Review Articles, Clinical Case Studies, and Technique, as well as Technological Developments, Theoretical Articles, and Synthetic Reviews. Technical advances, such as novel brain imaging methods, analyses for detecting or localizing neural activity, synergistic uses of multiple imaging modalities, and strategies for the design of behavioral paradigms and neural-systems modeling are of particular interest. The journal endorses the propagation of methodological standards and encourages database development in the field of human brain mapping.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信