The Accuracy of Melting Curve–Based Multiplex Real-Time PCR for Diagnosing Helicobacter pylori Resistance to Clarithromycin and Levofloxacin in Stool Specimens

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Helicobacter Pub Date : 2025-02-11 DOI:10.1111/hel.70012
Youhua Wang, Xiaoling Gong, Qirui Lai, Hui Fang, Xiyin Yang, Xuan Li, Dong Sheng Liu, Yong Xie
{"title":"The Accuracy of Melting Curve–Based Multiplex Real-Time PCR for Diagnosing Helicobacter pylori Resistance to Clarithromycin and Levofloxacin in Stool Specimens","authors":"Youhua Wang,&nbsp;Xiaoling Gong,&nbsp;Qirui Lai,&nbsp;Hui Fang,&nbsp;Xiyin Yang,&nbsp;Xuan Li,&nbsp;Dong Sheng Liu,&nbsp;Yong Xie","doi":"10.1111/hel.70012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aims</h3>\n \n <p>This study evaluates the accuracy of melting curve–based multiplex real-time PCR (multiplex rt-PCR) on stool samples for diagnosing antibiotic resistance in <i>Helicobacter pylori</i> (<i>H. pylori</i>) compared to E-test and sequencing.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Gastric biopsies and stool samples were collected from 385 <i>H. pylori</i>-infected patients. A total of 325 strains were isolated, and genomic DNA was extracted from all 385 stool samples. E-tests were conducted to detect phenotypic resistance for clarithromycin and levofloxacin. Sanger sequencing and multiplex rt-PCR were employed to identify <i>H. pylori</i> 23S rRNA and GyrA mutations.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>E-test results indicated that 203 (62.5%) were susceptible to both clarithromycin and levofloxacin, 33 (10.2%) exhibited mono-resistance to clarithromycin, 48 (14.8%) showed mono-resistance to levofloxacin, and 41 (12.6%) had dual resistance to both antibiotics. Compared to E-test results, the sensitivity and specificity of the multiplex rt-PCR method for detecting clarithromycin resistance mutation were 93.2 (95% CI 84.3–97.5) and 87.1% (95% CI 82.2–90.9), respectively. For levofloxacin resistance mutation, the multiplex rt-PCR method showed a sensitivity of 80.7 (95% CI 70.3–88.3) and a specificity of 93.0% (95% CI 88.7–95.8). Compared to Sanger sequencing, the sensitivity and specificity of the multiplex rt-PCR method for detecting clarithromycin resistance mutation were 95.8 (95% CI 90.0–98.4) and 96.0% (95% CI 92.6–98.0), respectively. For levofloxacin resistance mutation, the multiplex rt-PCR method showed a sensitivity of 91.3% (95% CI, 83.1–95.9) and a specificity of 96.1% (95% CI, 92.7–98.0).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Genotypic methods, including Sanger sequencing and multiplex rt-PCR, were rapid and reliable for diagnosing clarithromycin and levofloxacin resistance in the stool samples.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":13223,"journal":{"name":"Helicobacter","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Helicobacter","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/hel.70012","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims

This study evaluates the accuracy of melting curve–based multiplex real-time PCR (multiplex rt-PCR) on stool samples for diagnosing antibiotic resistance in Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) compared to E-test and sequencing.

Methods

Gastric biopsies and stool samples were collected from 385 H. pylori-infected patients. A total of 325 strains were isolated, and genomic DNA was extracted from all 385 stool samples. E-tests were conducted to detect phenotypic resistance for clarithromycin and levofloxacin. Sanger sequencing and multiplex rt-PCR were employed to identify H. pylori 23S rRNA and GyrA mutations.

Results

E-test results indicated that 203 (62.5%) were susceptible to both clarithromycin and levofloxacin, 33 (10.2%) exhibited mono-resistance to clarithromycin, 48 (14.8%) showed mono-resistance to levofloxacin, and 41 (12.6%) had dual resistance to both antibiotics. Compared to E-test results, the sensitivity and specificity of the multiplex rt-PCR method for detecting clarithromycin resistance mutation were 93.2 (95% CI 84.3–97.5) and 87.1% (95% CI 82.2–90.9), respectively. For levofloxacin resistance mutation, the multiplex rt-PCR method showed a sensitivity of 80.7 (95% CI 70.3–88.3) and a specificity of 93.0% (95% CI 88.7–95.8). Compared to Sanger sequencing, the sensitivity and specificity of the multiplex rt-PCR method for detecting clarithromycin resistance mutation were 95.8 (95% CI 90.0–98.4) and 96.0% (95% CI 92.6–98.0), respectively. For levofloxacin resistance mutation, the multiplex rt-PCR method showed a sensitivity of 91.3% (95% CI, 83.1–95.9) and a specificity of 96.1% (95% CI, 92.7–98.0).

Conclusion

Genotypic methods, including Sanger sequencing and multiplex rt-PCR, were rapid and reliable for diagnosing clarithromycin and levofloxacin resistance in the stool samples.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Helicobacter
Helicobacter 医学-微生物学
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
9.10%
发文量
76
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Helicobacter is edited by Professor David Y Graham. The editorial and peer review process is an independent process. Whenever there is a conflict of interest, the editor and editorial board will declare their interests and affiliations. Helicobacter recognises the critical role that has been established for Helicobacter pylori in peptic ulcer, gastric adenocarcinoma, and primary gastric lymphoma. As new helicobacter species are now regularly being discovered, Helicobacter covers the entire range of helicobacter research, increasing communication among the fields of gastroenterology; microbiology; vaccine development; laboratory animal science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信