Audrey Elford , Chris Irwin , Alison Spence , Iasha Aminath , Ashlee Kelly , Penelope Love
{"title":"Testing a food provision and wastage audit protocol (NUTRI_WASTE_ECEC) in early childhood education settings: An equivalence study.","authors":"Audrey Elford , Chris Irwin , Alison Spence , Iasha Aminath , Ashlee Kelly , Penelope Love","doi":"10.1016/j.foodqual.2025.105464","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Early Childhood Education and Care settings (ECEC) are important food environments, with young children often receiving approximately half of their daily nutritional needs while in attendance. Previous ECEC research has found poor menu quality and high levels of food waste, which have implications for human and planetary health. A self-administered weighed protocol (NUTRI_WASTE_ECEC) was developed to audit food provision and wastage at both pre-consumption (serving waste) and post-consumption (plate waste) levels. This study examined the accuracy of data collected using the protocol across different administrators. Data was collected within a university food laboratory by a trained researcher and six research assistants (under conditions simulating ECEC settings). Following the NUTRI_WASTE_ECEC protocol, raw and prepared ingredients, and serving and plate waste were weighed and photographed individually. Equivalence testing was used to verify if the mean % difference (and 90 % CI) between the trained researcher and research assistants were within established acceptable margins of variance (± 10 %). Statistical equivalence was observed for weight comparisons of total prepared food served, serving waste and plate waste (all p's < 0.001). For raw ingredients, statistical equivalence was observed for reported weights of most (45 of 54) items (all p's < 0.05). The self-administered NUTRI_WASTE_ECEC protocol is therefore considered to yield equivalent results compared with the trained researcher-administered protocols most commonly used for the measurement of food provision and wastage in the ECEC setting. Future research should focus on user experience, feasibility and utility in different ECEC settings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":322,"journal":{"name":"Food Quality and Preference","volume":"127 ","pages":"Article 105464"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Quality and Preference","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950329325000394","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Early Childhood Education and Care settings (ECEC) are important food environments, with young children often receiving approximately half of their daily nutritional needs while in attendance. Previous ECEC research has found poor menu quality and high levels of food waste, which have implications for human and planetary health. A self-administered weighed protocol (NUTRI_WASTE_ECEC) was developed to audit food provision and wastage at both pre-consumption (serving waste) and post-consumption (plate waste) levels. This study examined the accuracy of data collected using the protocol across different administrators. Data was collected within a university food laboratory by a trained researcher and six research assistants (under conditions simulating ECEC settings). Following the NUTRI_WASTE_ECEC protocol, raw and prepared ingredients, and serving and plate waste were weighed and photographed individually. Equivalence testing was used to verify if the mean % difference (and 90 % CI) between the trained researcher and research assistants were within established acceptable margins of variance (± 10 %). Statistical equivalence was observed for weight comparisons of total prepared food served, serving waste and plate waste (all p's < 0.001). For raw ingredients, statistical equivalence was observed for reported weights of most (45 of 54) items (all p's < 0.05). The self-administered NUTRI_WASTE_ECEC protocol is therefore considered to yield equivalent results compared with the trained researcher-administered protocols most commonly used for the measurement of food provision and wastage in the ECEC setting. Future research should focus on user experience, feasibility and utility in different ECEC settings.
期刊介绍:
Food Quality and Preference is a journal devoted to sensory, consumer and behavioural research in food and non-food products. It publishes original research, critical reviews, and short communications in sensory and consumer science, and sensometrics. In addition, the journal publishes special invited issues on important timely topics and from relevant conferences. These are aimed at bridging the gap between research and application, bringing together authors and readers in consumer and market research, sensory science, sensometrics and sensory evaluation, nutrition and food choice, as well as food research, product development and sensory quality assurance. Submissions to Food Quality and Preference are limited to papers that include some form of human measurement; papers that are limited to physical/chemical measures or the routine application of sensory, consumer or econometric analysis will not be considered unless they specifically make a novel scientific contribution in line with the journal''s coverage as outlined below.