Mid-term (5 years) impacts of wildfire on soil chemical and biological properties in a UK peatland

IF 4.8 2区 农林科学 Q1 SOIL SCIENCE
Luigi Marfella , Mark A. Ashby , Georgia Hennessy , Jon Rowe , Rossana Marzaioli , Flora A. Rutigliano , Helen C. Glanville
{"title":"Mid-term (5 years) impacts of wildfire on soil chemical and biological properties in a UK peatland","authors":"Luigi Marfella ,&nbsp;Mark A. Ashby ,&nbsp;Georgia Hennessy ,&nbsp;Jon Rowe ,&nbsp;Rossana Marzaioli ,&nbsp;Flora A. Rutigliano ,&nbsp;Helen C. Glanville","doi":"10.1016/j.apsoil.2025.105953","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Peat degradation due to human activities and global change exposes peatlands to increasing fire risk. Given their key ecological role in carbon storage and water filtration, studying fire impacts on a UK peatland is significant in a global context. This study aimed to assess the medium-term impacts of the 2018 wildfire on peatland soil within the Roaches Nature Reserve (UK). To test whether fire effects were still evident five years after the event and whether marginally affected areas exhibited greater soil recovery, several peat characteristics were evaluated in 2023 at increasing distances from the unburnt control area toward the fire's ignition point, in the order S1, S2, S3 and S4. Results confirmed that the fire effect was still evident after five years, showing a significant increase in pH from 3.59 ± 0.04 in control to 3.85 ± 0.03 in burnt peat, a 60 and 70 % reduction in water and organic carbon content compared to control (65.2 ± 1.33 % and 42.9 ± 1.80 %, respectively), up to 85 % reductions in microbial carbon and nitrogen relative to control (2.48 ± 0.12 and 0.17 ± 0.01 g kg<sup>−1</sup>, respectively). The observed spatial gradient of fire impact was: S4 ≫ S3 = S1 ≥ S2, only partially confirming the second hypothesis. As expected, S4 site, farther from the unburnt area, exhibited the worst recovery, but S1 site, proximal to the unburnt area, did not show the highest recovery. This is probably due to the variable nature of peatland fire dynamics and post-fire recovery, highlighting the need for more detailed analyses in future studies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8099,"journal":{"name":"Applied Soil Ecology","volume":"207 ","pages":"Article 105953"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Soil Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0929139325000915","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Peat degradation due to human activities and global change exposes peatlands to increasing fire risk. Given their key ecological role in carbon storage and water filtration, studying fire impacts on a UK peatland is significant in a global context. This study aimed to assess the medium-term impacts of the 2018 wildfire on peatland soil within the Roaches Nature Reserve (UK). To test whether fire effects were still evident five years after the event and whether marginally affected areas exhibited greater soil recovery, several peat characteristics were evaluated in 2023 at increasing distances from the unburnt control area toward the fire's ignition point, in the order S1, S2, S3 and S4. Results confirmed that the fire effect was still evident after five years, showing a significant increase in pH from 3.59 ± 0.04 in control to 3.85 ± 0.03 in burnt peat, a 60 and 70 % reduction in water and organic carbon content compared to control (65.2 ± 1.33 % and 42.9 ± 1.80 %, respectively), up to 85 % reductions in microbial carbon and nitrogen relative to control (2.48 ± 0.12 and 0.17 ± 0.01 g kg−1, respectively). The observed spatial gradient of fire impact was: S4 ≫ S3 = S1 ≥ S2, only partially confirming the second hypothesis. As expected, S4 site, farther from the unburnt area, exhibited the worst recovery, but S1 site, proximal to the unburnt area, did not show the highest recovery. This is probably due to the variable nature of peatland fire dynamics and post-fire recovery, highlighting the need for more detailed analyses in future studies.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Soil Ecology
Applied Soil Ecology 农林科学-土壤科学
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
4.20%
发文量
363
审稿时长
5.3 months
期刊介绍: Applied Soil Ecology addresses the role of soil organisms and their interactions in relation to: sustainability and productivity, nutrient cycling and other soil processes, the maintenance of soil functions, the impact of human activities on soil ecosystems and bio(techno)logical control of soil-inhabiting pests, diseases and weeds.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信