Denutrition status prevails over a standard AML risk assessment in older adults

IF 3.2 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Laura Simon , Alexis Caulier , Céline Berthon , Thomas Boyer , Véronique Harrivel , Magalie Joris , Isabelle Leduc , Nicolas Duployez , Claude Preudhomme , Jean-Pierre Marolleau , Delphine Lebon
{"title":"Denutrition status prevails over a standard AML risk assessment in older adults","authors":"Laura Simon ,&nbsp;Alexis Caulier ,&nbsp;Céline Berthon ,&nbsp;Thomas Boyer ,&nbsp;Véronique Harrivel ,&nbsp;Magalie Joris ,&nbsp;Isabelle Leduc ,&nbsp;Nicolas Duployez ,&nbsp;Claude Preudhomme ,&nbsp;Jean-Pierre Marolleau ,&nbsp;Delphine Lebon","doi":"10.1016/j.retram.2025.103500","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Older adults with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) have a poor prognosis because frailty and the characteristics of the disease limit the use of intensive chemotherapy (ICT). Treatment with 5-azacitidine (5-AZA) or low-dose cytarabine (Cytarabine) (LDAC) – with or without venetoclax – is currently recommended in this setting. However, we lack real-life data on response rates and treatment outcomes.</div><div>We conducted a retrospective, multicenter registry study of 279 older adults with AML (median [interquartile range (IQR)] age: 76 [70–81]) having undergone first-line treatment with LDAC (<em>n</em> = 87) or 5-AZA (<em>n</em> = 192) between 2009 and 2019 (i.e. mainly before the venetoclax era) in a university medical center in France. The complete remission rate was 27.3 % overall. After a median follow-up period of 6.9 months, the median [IQR] overall survival (OS) time was shorter in the LDAC group (4.8 months [2.13–14.41]) than in the 5-AZA group (8.9 months [3.2–13.5]; <em>p</em> = 0.046). Ultimately, however, the OS rates were similar in the LDAC and 5-AZA groups (hazard ratio [HR]: 95 % confidence interval [CI]: 1.37 [0.92–2.04], <em>p</em> = 0.12).</div><div>None of the conventional markers with prognostic value in younger patients receiving ICT (such as those in the European LeukemiaNet classification) appeared to predict the outcome in our population of older patients. Albumin &lt;30 g/L was the only factor that predicted day-30 mortality and OS (adjusted odds ratio [95 %CI]: 6.25 [2.08 – 20.0]; <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001; adjusted HR [95 %CI]: 0.65 [0.44–0.96]; <em>p</em> = 0.030).</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54260,"journal":{"name":"Current Research in Translational Medicine","volume":"73 2","pages":"Article 103500"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Research in Translational Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452318625000091","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Older adults with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) have a poor prognosis because frailty and the characteristics of the disease limit the use of intensive chemotherapy (ICT). Treatment with 5-azacitidine (5-AZA) or low-dose cytarabine (Cytarabine) (LDAC) – with or without venetoclax – is currently recommended in this setting. However, we lack real-life data on response rates and treatment outcomes.
We conducted a retrospective, multicenter registry study of 279 older adults with AML (median [interquartile range (IQR)] age: 76 [70–81]) having undergone first-line treatment with LDAC (n = 87) or 5-AZA (n = 192) between 2009 and 2019 (i.e. mainly before the venetoclax era) in a university medical center in France. The complete remission rate was 27.3 % overall. After a median follow-up period of 6.9 months, the median [IQR] overall survival (OS) time was shorter in the LDAC group (4.8 months [2.13–14.41]) than in the 5-AZA group (8.9 months [3.2–13.5]; p = 0.046). Ultimately, however, the OS rates were similar in the LDAC and 5-AZA groups (hazard ratio [HR]: 95 % confidence interval [CI]: 1.37 [0.92–2.04], p = 0.12).
None of the conventional markers with prognostic value in younger patients receiving ICT (such as those in the European LeukemiaNet classification) appeared to predict the outcome in our population of older patients. Albumin <30 g/L was the only factor that predicted day-30 mortality and OS (adjusted odds ratio [95 %CI]: 6.25 [2.08 – 20.0]; p < 0.001; adjusted HR [95 %CI]: 0.65 [0.44–0.96]; p = 0.030).

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Research in Translational Medicine
Current Research in Translational Medicine Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-General Biochemistry,Genetics and Molecular Biology
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
4.90%
发文量
51
审稿时长
45 days
期刊介绍: Current Research in Translational Medicine is a peer-reviewed journal, publishing worldwide clinical and basic research in the field of hematology, immunology, infectiology, hematopoietic cell transplantation, and cellular and gene therapy. The journal considers for publication English-language editorials, original articles, reviews, and short reports including case-reports. Contributions are intended to draw attention to experimental medicine and translational research. Current Research in Translational Medicine periodically publishes thematic issues and is indexed in all major international databases (2017 Impact Factor is 1.9). Core areas covered in Current Research in Translational Medicine are: Hematology, Immunology, Infectiology, Hematopoietic, Cell Transplantation, Cellular and Gene Therapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信