An investigation of force potential against the companion dog neck associated with collar use

IF 1.3 3区 农林科学 Q4 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Joshua Bailey , Dakota Discepolo , Janice Baker , Erin Perry
{"title":"An investigation of force potential against the companion dog neck associated with collar use","authors":"Joshua Bailey ,&nbsp;Dakota Discepolo ,&nbsp;Janice Baker ,&nbsp;Erin Perry","doi":"10.1016/j.jveb.2024.10.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Pulling behavior while on-lead in dogs is a common problem with the potential for serious injury to both dogs and humans. Harnesses are often marketed as a “no pull” alternative to traditional neck collars. However, a literature search revealed only one previous study comparing leash tension in collars vs. harnesses worn by dogs lured with a food treat which showed greater leash tension when using a harness compared to collar. To further investigate this occurrence, our study compares pulling force generated by dogs of various sizes wearing either a traditional neck collar or chest harness when exposed to common environmental stimuli. Privately owned companion dogs (n = 28) were evaluated in a randomized cross-over design wearing a 1.5-inch flat nylon collar and standard padded chest harness clipped in the back and grouped as follows: small (≤ 13 kg); medium (14–22 kg); or large (≥ 23 kg). Each dog was presented with three commonly encountered environmental stimuli (unfamiliar dog, food, thrown toy) during a walk outdoors. Pulling force against the neck was measured with a digital dynamometer attached between the collar/harness and leash and measured as pound-force (lbf). Measurements were converted to Newtons (N) for statistical analysis (1 lbf = 4.45 N). Dogs pulled with greater mean force (P &lt; 0.0001) while wearing a harness as compared to a collar (60.5 ± 3.91 N and 37.81 ± 3.51 N, respectively). Furthermore, peak pulling force was also greater in the back-clip harness (198.84 ± 5.43 N) as compared to the collar (162.80 ± 5.38 N) (P = 0.03). When peak pulling force was expressed as a % of body weight (% BW), dogs categorized as small pulled with the highest force (122 ± 9.45% BW) when compared to the medium and large group (85.8 ± 10.09% BW; 82.7 ± 3.62% BW) respectively (P &lt; 0.0001). These data are the first to compare measured force exerted by dogs exhibiting natural pulling tendencies and demonstrate that companion dogs pulled with greater force when wearing a padded harness as compared to a traditional collar. This information may help provide insight into the selection of proper equipment for dogs to improve the walking experience for both dogs and their owners.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17567,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Veterinary Behavior-clinical Applications and Research","volume":"78 ","pages":"Pages 19-24"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Veterinary Behavior-clinical Applications and Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1558787824000893","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Pulling behavior while on-lead in dogs is a common problem with the potential for serious injury to both dogs and humans. Harnesses are often marketed as a “no pull” alternative to traditional neck collars. However, a literature search revealed only one previous study comparing leash tension in collars vs. harnesses worn by dogs lured with a food treat which showed greater leash tension when using a harness compared to collar. To further investigate this occurrence, our study compares pulling force generated by dogs of various sizes wearing either a traditional neck collar or chest harness when exposed to common environmental stimuli. Privately owned companion dogs (n = 28) were evaluated in a randomized cross-over design wearing a 1.5-inch flat nylon collar and standard padded chest harness clipped in the back and grouped as follows: small (≤ 13 kg); medium (14–22 kg); or large (≥ 23 kg). Each dog was presented with three commonly encountered environmental stimuli (unfamiliar dog, food, thrown toy) during a walk outdoors. Pulling force against the neck was measured with a digital dynamometer attached between the collar/harness and leash and measured as pound-force (lbf). Measurements were converted to Newtons (N) for statistical analysis (1 lbf = 4.45 N). Dogs pulled with greater mean force (P < 0.0001) while wearing a harness as compared to a collar (60.5 ± 3.91 N and 37.81 ± 3.51 N, respectively). Furthermore, peak pulling force was also greater in the back-clip harness (198.84 ± 5.43 N) as compared to the collar (162.80 ± 5.38 N) (P = 0.03). When peak pulling force was expressed as a % of body weight (% BW), dogs categorized as small pulled with the highest force (122 ± 9.45% BW) when compared to the medium and large group (85.8 ± 10.09% BW; 82.7 ± 3.62% BW) respectively (P < 0.0001). These data are the first to compare measured force exerted by dogs exhibiting natural pulling tendencies and demonstrate that companion dogs pulled with greater force when wearing a padded harness as compared to a traditional collar. This information may help provide insight into the selection of proper equipment for dogs to improve the walking experience for both dogs and their owners.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
16.70%
发文量
107
审稿时长
325 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Veterinary Behavior: Clinical Applications and Research is an international journal that focuses on all aspects of veterinary behavioral medicine, with a particular emphasis on clinical applications and research. Articles cover such topics as basic research involving normal signaling or social behaviors, welfare and/or housing issues, molecular or quantitative genetics, and applied behavioral issues (eg, working dogs) that may have implications for clinical interest or assessment. JVEB is the official journal of the Australian Veterinary Behaviour Interest Group, the British Veterinary Behaviour Association, Gesellschaft fr Tierverhaltensmedizin und Therapie, the International Working Dog Breeding Association, the Pet Professional Guild, the Association Veterinaire Suisse pour la Medecine Comportementale, and The American Veterinary Society of Animal Behavior.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信