Non-isothermal thermo-chemical pyrolytic conversion of Modar (Erythrina indica L.) and Mahaneem (Azadirachta indica A.): Kinetics & thermodynamics evaluation

IF 6.2 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING
Gaffer Ahmed, Praveen Kumar Reddy Annapureddy, Nanda Kishore
{"title":"Non-isothermal thermo-chemical pyrolytic conversion of Modar (Erythrina indica L.) and Mahaneem (Azadirachta indica A.): Kinetics & thermodynamics evaluation","authors":"Gaffer Ahmed,&nbsp;Praveen Kumar Reddy Annapureddy,&nbsp;Nanda Kishore","doi":"10.1016/j.indcrop.2025.120656","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Co-feed pyrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass blend presents an intriguing approach to enhance the quantity and quality of pyrolysis products. The approach seeks to leverage the versatility of pyrolysis process and contribute to the advancement of sustainable fuels. In this study, the kinetic triplets and thermodynamics of co-pyrolysis of Modar <em>(Erythrina indica</em> L.) (EI) and Mahaneem (<em>Azadirachta indica</em> A.) (AI) were evaluated at seven varying co-feed ratios <span><math><mrow><mo>(</mo><mn>1</mn><mo>:</mo><mn>1</mn><mrow><mi>;</mi></mrow><mspace></mspace><mn>1</mn><mo>:</mo><mn>2</mn><mrow><mi>;</mi></mrow><mspace></mspace><mn>1</mn><mo>:</mo><mn>3</mn><mrow><mi>;</mi></mrow><mspace></mspace><mn>1</mn><mo>:</mo><mn>4</mn><mrow><mi>;</mi></mrow><mspace></mspace><mn>2</mn><mo>:</mo><mn>1</mn><mrow><mi>;</mi></mrow><mspace></mspace><mn>3</mn><mo>:</mo><mn>1</mn><mspace></mspace><mi>and</mi><mspace></mspace><mn>4</mn><mo>:</mo><mn>1</mn><mo>)</mo></mrow></math></span>. For this purpose, thermogravimetric study of the co-feeds were carried out at heating rates of <span><math><mrow><mn>10</mn><mo>,</mo><mspace></mspace><mn>20</mn><mo>,</mo><mspace></mspace><mn>30</mn><mspace></mspace><mi>and</mi><mspace></mspace><mn>40</mn><mo>°</mo><mi>C</mi><mo>/</mo><mi>min</mi></mrow></math></span> and this data was further utilized as input for five different iso-conversional methods used to estimate kinetics of the process. Results revealed that the co-feed ratio of 4:1 necessitates the maximum activation energy for its co-pyrolysis, whereas 2:1 ratio demands the minimum. However, considering <span><math><msup><mrow><mi>R</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msup></math></span> values, the co-feed ratio of 1:1 emerges out to be the preferable choice for its co-pyrolysis, displaying relatively low activation energy requirements for its co-pyrolysis and consistently high <span><math><msup><mrow><mi>R</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msup></math></span> values exceeding 0.99 across all values of the conversion. Average activation energy (<em>E</em><sub>α</sub>) and pre-exponential factor (<em>k</em><sub>o</sub>) values for the pyrolysis of co-feed ratio of 1:1 ranged from <span><math><mrow><mn>169.643</mn><mo>−</mo><mn>179.808</mn></mrow></math></span> <span><math><mrow><mi>kJ</mi><mo>/</mo><mi>mol</mi></mrow></math></span> and <span><math><mrow><mn>1.272</mn><mspace></mspace><mo>×</mo><mspace></mspace><msup><mrow><mn>10</mn></mrow><mrow><mn>13</mn></mrow></msup><mo>−</mo><mn>5.898</mn><mspace></mspace><mo>×</mo><mspace></mspace><msup><mrow><mn>10</mn></mrow><mrow><mn>16</mn></mrow></msup><mspace></mspace><msup><mrow><mi>min</mi></mrow><mrow><mo>−</mo><mn>1</mn></mrow></msup></mrow></math></span>, respectively. Correspondingly, the average values of thermodynamic properties, including enthalpy change (∆H), Gibbs free energy change (∆G), and entropy change (∆S) varied in the range of <span><math><mrow><mn>164.421</mn><mspace></mspace><mo>−</mo><mspace></mspace><mn>174.819</mn><mspace></mspace><mi>kJ</mi><mo>/</mo><mi>mol</mi><mo>,</mo><mspace></mspace><mn>173.425</mn><mspace></mspace><mo>−</mo><mspace></mspace><mn>175.288</mn><mspace></mspace><mi>kJ</mi><mo>/</mo><mi>mol</mi><mspace></mspace><mi>and</mi><mspace></mspace><mo>−</mo><mspace></mspace><mn>0.017</mn><mspace></mspace><mo>−</mo><mspace></mspace><mn>0.002</mn><mspace></mspace><mi>kJ</mi><mo>/</mo><mi>mol</mi><mspace></mspace><mrow><mi>K</mi></mrow></mrow></math></span>, respectively. In summary, though the difference between average <em>E</em><sub>α</sub> and ∆H is only ≈ 5 kJ/mol; positive ∆H, positive ∆G and positive ∆S indicate that the co-pyrolysis of EI and AI is possible only at high temperatures.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":13581,"journal":{"name":"Industrial Crops and Products","volume":"226 ","pages":"Article 120656"},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Industrial Crops and Products","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S092666902500202X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Co-feed pyrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass blend presents an intriguing approach to enhance the quantity and quality of pyrolysis products. The approach seeks to leverage the versatility of pyrolysis process and contribute to the advancement of sustainable fuels. In this study, the kinetic triplets and thermodynamics of co-pyrolysis of Modar (Erythrina indica L.) (EI) and Mahaneem (Azadirachta indica A.) (AI) were evaluated at seven varying co-feed ratios (1:1;1:2;1:3;1:4;2:1;3:1and4:1). For this purpose, thermogravimetric study of the co-feeds were carried out at heating rates of 10,20,30and40°C/min and this data was further utilized as input for five different iso-conversional methods used to estimate kinetics of the process. Results revealed that the co-feed ratio of 4:1 necessitates the maximum activation energy for its co-pyrolysis, whereas 2:1 ratio demands the minimum. However, considering R2 values, the co-feed ratio of 1:1 emerges out to be the preferable choice for its co-pyrolysis, displaying relatively low activation energy requirements for its co-pyrolysis and consistently high R2 values exceeding 0.99 across all values of the conversion. Average activation energy (Eα) and pre-exponential factor (ko) values for the pyrolysis of co-feed ratio of 1:1 ranged from 169.643179.808 kJ/mol and 1.272×10135.898×1016min1, respectively. Correspondingly, the average values of thermodynamic properties, including enthalpy change (∆H), Gibbs free energy change (∆G), and entropy change (∆S) varied in the range of 164.421174.819kJ/mol,173.425175.288kJ/moland0.0170.002kJ/molK, respectively. In summary, though the difference between average Eα and ∆H is only ≈ 5 kJ/mol; positive ∆H, positive ∆G and positive ∆S indicate that the co-pyrolysis of EI and AI is possible only at high temperatures.

Abstract Image

Modar (Erythrina indica L.)和Mahaneem (Azadirachta indica A.)的非等温热化学热解转化:动力学和热力学评价
木质纤维素生物质共进料热解为提高热解产物的数量和质量提供了一条有趣的途径。该方法旨在利用热解过程的多功能性,并为可持续燃料的发展做出贡献。本研究对Modar (Erythrina indica L.) (EI)和Mahaneem (Azadirachta indica A.) (AI)在7种不同的共进料比(1:1、1:2、1:3、1:4、2:1、3:1和4:1)下共热解的动力学三元组和热力学进行了评价。为此,在升温速率为10、20、30和40°C/min的情况下,对共进料进行了热重研究,并将这些数据进一步用作五种不同等转换方法的输入,用于估计该过程的动力学。结果表明,当共进比为4:1时,其共热解所需的活化能最大,而当共进比为2:1时,其共热解所需的活化能最小。但考虑到R2值,共进料比为1:1是其共热解的较好选择,其共热解所需活化能相对较低,且在所有转化值中R2值始终较高,均超过0.99。共进料比为1:1时,热解的平均活化能Eα和指数前因子ko分别为169.643 ~ 179.808 kJ/mol和1.272×1013−5.898×1016min−1。焓变(∆H)、吉布斯自由能变化(∆G)和熵变(∆S)的平均值分别为164.421 ~ 174.819kJ/mol、173.425 ~ 175.288kJ/ molK和0.017 ~ 0.002kJ/molK。综上所述,虽然平均Eα与∆H的差值仅为≈5 kJ/mol;正的∆H,正的∆G和正的∆S表明EI和AI只有在高温下才能共热解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Industrial Crops and Products
Industrial Crops and Products 农林科学-农业工程
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
8.50%
发文量
1518
审稿时长
43 days
期刊介绍: Industrial Crops and Products is an International Journal publishing academic and industrial research on industrial (defined as non-food/non-feed) crops and products. Papers concern both crop-oriented and bio-based materials from crops-oriented research, and should be of interest to an international audience, hypothesis driven, and where comparisons are made statistics performed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信