Night shift work and breast cancer risk – 2023 update of epidemiologic evidence

IF 7.6 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Johnni Hansen, Julie Elbæk Pedersen
{"title":"Night shift work and breast cancer risk – 2023 update of epidemiologic evidence","authors":"Johnni Hansen,&nbsp;Julie Elbæk Pedersen","doi":"10.1016/j.jncc.2024.07.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Night shift work is a complex and frequent occupational exposure, and breast cancer stands as the most prevalent cancer in women. The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) has twice classified night shift work as a probable breast carcinogen, with the latest classification in June 2019. Since that time, new epidemiologic data has emerged.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We searched PubMed for original articles based on cohort and case-control studies of “breast cancer and night shift work” published after the IARC evaluation in June 2019.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In total six cohorts and four case-control studies were included in our review. Overall, we observed some support for associations between persistent (long duration or high frequency) night shift work and an increase in breast cancer risk, though most studies were relatively small and statistically under-powered. Moreover, the recent studies do not contribute further evidence regarding the interaction with menopausal status, diurnal preference, hormonal subtypes of breast cancer or gene-environment aspects, which were issues that were left from the IARC evaluation.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The available new results somewhat consolidate the epidemiological evidence from IARC's 2019 evaluation, and do not provide further evidence regarding interaction of interest, e.g. menopausal status, etc. Therefore, long term follow-up of prospective cohorts or nested case-control studies, including precise exposure assessment and examinations of relevant interactions such as menopausal status, diurnal preference, hormonal subtypes of breast cancer and gene-environment aspects, are warranted. Meanwhile, protective measures for the night workers should be considered.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73987,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the National Cancer Center","volume":"5 1","pages":"Pages 94-103"},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the National Cancer Center","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667005424000838","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Night shift work is a complex and frequent occupational exposure, and breast cancer stands as the most prevalent cancer in women. The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) has twice classified night shift work as a probable breast carcinogen, with the latest classification in June 2019. Since that time, new epidemiologic data has emerged.

Methods

We searched PubMed for original articles based on cohort and case-control studies of “breast cancer and night shift work” published after the IARC evaluation in June 2019.

Results

In total six cohorts and four case-control studies were included in our review. Overall, we observed some support for associations between persistent (long duration or high frequency) night shift work and an increase in breast cancer risk, though most studies were relatively small and statistically under-powered. Moreover, the recent studies do not contribute further evidence regarding the interaction with menopausal status, diurnal preference, hormonal subtypes of breast cancer or gene-environment aspects, which were issues that were left from the IARC evaluation.

Conclusions

The available new results somewhat consolidate the epidemiological evidence from IARC's 2019 evaluation, and do not provide further evidence regarding interaction of interest, e.g. menopausal status, etc. Therefore, long term follow-up of prospective cohorts or nested case-control studies, including precise exposure assessment and examinations of relevant interactions such as menopausal status, diurnal preference, hormonal subtypes of breast cancer and gene-environment aspects, are warranted. Meanwhile, protective measures for the night workers should be considered.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
14.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
70 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信