An incentive-based framework for small-load flexibility providers

IF 16.3 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
V.K. Moreno , C. Valor , J.P. Chaves
{"title":"An incentive-based framework for small-load flexibility providers","authors":"V.K. Moreno ,&nbsp;C. Valor ,&nbsp;J.P. Chaves","doi":"10.1016/j.rser.2025.115479","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Integrating renewable energy sources into electricity systems is essential for achieving a sustainable, low-carbon future. Despite the benefits, the intermittent and variable nature of renewable power generation introduces significant challenges, highlighting the need for increased system flexibility. Although previous studies emphasize the importance of incentives to attract customer participation in flexibility provision and to ensure the viability of the aggregator business model, there remains a lack of a systematic, comprehensive, and integrated incentive model. This research introduces a comprehensive Incentive-Based Framework designed to harmonise the objectives of three key stakeholders: aggregators, small-load flexibility providers (customers), and system operators, including distribution and transmission system operators.</div><div>The development of this framework employs a dual-review approach. Initially, a literature review establishes the foundational principles critical for the viability of the aggregator business model. Subsequently, a review of existing projects examines flexibility initiatives across the United States, European Union, and the United Kingdom, identifying key components currently in use. This second phase exploits extensive, publicly accessible data from the mature U.S. market and enhances the model with insights from European projects. By integrating these analyses, the framework effectively aligns financial and operational aspects of flexibility provision with the perceived value from the customer's perspective, supporting the sustainability of aggregating flexibility from small customers. The findings and recommendations of this study offer valuable insights for policymakers, market operators, and stakeholders, fostering active customer engagement and facilitating the successful integration of renewable energy sources into electricity systems.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":418,"journal":{"name":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","volume":"213 ","pages":"Article 115479"},"PeriodicalIF":16.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032125001522","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Integrating renewable energy sources into electricity systems is essential for achieving a sustainable, low-carbon future. Despite the benefits, the intermittent and variable nature of renewable power generation introduces significant challenges, highlighting the need for increased system flexibility. Although previous studies emphasize the importance of incentives to attract customer participation in flexibility provision and to ensure the viability of the aggregator business model, there remains a lack of a systematic, comprehensive, and integrated incentive model. This research introduces a comprehensive Incentive-Based Framework designed to harmonise the objectives of three key stakeholders: aggregators, small-load flexibility providers (customers), and system operators, including distribution and transmission system operators.
The development of this framework employs a dual-review approach. Initially, a literature review establishes the foundational principles critical for the viability of the aggregator business model. Subsequently, a review of existing projects examines flexibility initiatives across the United States, European Union, and the United Kingdom, identifying key components currently in use. This second phase exploits extensive, publicly accessible data from the mature U.S. market and enhances the model with insights from European projects. By integrating these analyses, the framework effectively aligns financial and operational aspects of flexibility provision with the perceived value from the customer's perspective, supporting the sustainability of aggregating flexibility from small customers. The findings and recommendations of this study offer valuable insights for policymakers, market operators, and stakeholders, fostering active customer engagement and facilitating the successful integration of renewable energy sources into electricity systems.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 工程技术-能源与燃料
CiteScore
31.20
自引率
5.70%
发文量
1055
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: The mission of Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews is to disseminate the most compelling and pertinent critical insights in renewable and sustainable energy, fostering collaboration among the research community, private sector, and policy and decision makers. The journal aims to exchange challenges, solutions, innovative concepts, and technologies, contributing to sustainable development, the transition to a low-carbon future, and the attainment of emissions targets outlined by the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews publishes a diverse range of content, including review papers, original research, case studies, and analyses of new technologies, all featuring a substantial review component such as critique, comparison, or analysis. Introducing a distinctive paper type, Expert Insights, the journal presents commissioned mini-reviews authored by field leaders, addressing topics of significant interest. Case studies undergo consideration only if they showcase the work's applicability to other regions or contribute valuable insights to the broader field of renewable and sustainable energy. Notably, a bibliographic or literature review lacking critical analysis is deemed unsuitable for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信