Twelve-Year Follow-Up of a Randomised Controlled Trial Comparing the Effectiveness of Pelvic Floor Muscle Training Versus Mid-Urethral Sling Surgery for Female Moderate to Severe Urinary Incontinence

IF 4.7 1区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Hélène F. C. van Oorschot, Deodata Tijsseling, Julien Labrie, Carl H. van der Vaart
{"title":"Twelve-Year Follow-Up of a Randomised Controlled Trial Comparing the Effectiveness of Pelvic Floor Muscle Training Versus Mid-Urethral Sling Surgery for Female Moderate to Severe Urinary Incontinence","authors":"Hélène F. C. van Oorschot,&nbsp;Deodata Tijsseling,&nbsp;Julien Labrie,&nbsp;Carl H. van der Vaart","doi":"10.1111/1471-0528.18092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>To compare the 12-year effectiveness of pelvic floor muscle training versus midurethral sling surgery for moderate to severe female stress urinary incontinence.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Design</h3>\n \n <p>Observational follow-up study of a randomised controlled trial.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Setting</h3>\n \n <p>Conducted at the Division of Gynaecology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, The Netherlands.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Population</h3>\n \n <p>Women from the PORTRET study experiencing moderate to severe stress urinary incontinence.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A validated questionnaire was sent to participants.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Main Outcome Measures</h3>\n \n <p>The primary outcome was subjective improvement in urinary incontinence symptoms. Secondary outcomes included subjective cure, severity of incontinence, impact of incontinence as urogenital symptom and cross-over and re-operation rates.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>In this long-term study, 184 of 386 (47.7%) women responded to the questionnaire. Cross-over (86.9%) from the initial physiotherapy group to surgery was very high. No statistically significant differences were found in the intention to treat analysis. However, the post hoc analysis showed that women who underwent physiotherapy only reported a statistically significant lower improvement compared to those who underwent initial surgery (50.6% absolute difference; 95% CI 28.2–73.1) or surgery after physiotherapy (49.7% absolute difference; 95% CI 25.8–73.7). Subjective cure, decrease in perceived severity and impact of urinary incontinence also statistically significantly favoured women who underwent (initial) surgery Re-operation was reported by 4.6% of women.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>This 12-year follow-up study showed a very high cross-over rate to surgical treatment, considering a substantial proportion of non-responders. Midurethral sling surgery, either initial or after physiotherapy, statistically significantly improved subjective outcomes for moderate to severe stress urinary incontinence as compared to pelvic floor muscle physiotherapy only in the long-term.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50729,"journal":{"name":"Bjog-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology","volume":"132 6","pages":"826-833"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1471-0528.18092","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bjog-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1471-0528.18092","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To compare the 12-year effectiveness of pelvic floor muscle training versus midurethral sling surgery for moderate to severe female stress urinary incontinence.

Design

Observational follow-up study of a randomised controlled trial.

Setting

Conducted at the Division of Gynaecology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Population

Women from the PORTRET study experiencing moderate to severe stress urinary incontinence.

Methods

A validated questionnaire was sent to participants.

Main Outcome Measures

The primary outcome was subjective improvement in urinary incontinence symptoms. Secondary outcomes included subjective cure, severity of incontinence, impact of incontinence as urogenital symptom and cross-over and re-operation rates.

Results

In this long-term study, 184 of 386 (47.7%) women responded to the questionnaire. Cross-over (86.9%) from the initial physiotherapy group to surgery was very high. No statistically significant differences were found in the intention to treat analysis. However, the post hoc analysis showed that women who underwent physiotherapy only reported a statistically significant lower improvement compared to those who underwent initial surgery (50.6% absolute difference; 95% CI 28.2–73.1) or surgery after physiotherapy (49.7% absolute difference; 95% CI 25.8–73.7). Subjective cure, decrease in perceived severity and impact of urinary incontinence also statistically significantly favoured women who underwent (initial) surgery Re-operation was reported by 4.6% of women.

Conclusion

This 12-year follow-up study showed a very high cross-over rate to surgical treatment, considering a substantial proportion of non-responders. Midurethral sling surgery, either initial or after physiotherapy, statistically significantly improved subjective outcomes for moderate to severe stress urinary incontinence as compared to pelvic floor muscle physiotherapy only in the long-term.

Abstract Image

一项为期12年的随机对照试验,比较盆底肌肉训练与中尿道悬吊手术治疗女性中重度尿失禁的有效性
比较盆底肌肉训练与尿道中悬吊手术治疗中重度女性压力性尿失禁的12年疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
5.20%
发文量
345
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: BJOG is an editorially independent publication owned by the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG). The Journal publishes original, peer-reviewed work in all areas of obstetrics and gynaecology, including contraception, urogynaecology, fertility, oncology and clinical practice. Its aim is to publish the highest quality medical research in women''s health, worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信