Sustainable battery supplier selection of battery swapping station using an interval type-2 fuzzy method based on the cumulative prospect theory

IF 10 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Naijie Chai , Ziyu Chen , Wenliang Zhou , Gabriel Lodewijks
{"title":"Sustainable battery supplier selection of battery swapping station using an interval type-2 fuzzy method based on the cumulative prospect theory","authors":"Naijie Chai ,&nbsp;Ziyu Chen ,&nbsp;Wenliang Zhou ,&nbsp;Gabriel Lodewijks","doi":"10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.145007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Facing worldwide climate change, governments are actively promoting the use of electric vehicles (EVs). A battery swapping station (BSS) is a great asset, as it is one of the most important infrastructures for the promotion of EVs, which has become more and more popular recently due to its convenience and efficiency. Considering the batteries as the kernel component of EVs, the prices of which occupy almost half of the total operational cost of an EV, directly affecting battery electric vehicle (BEV) penetration. Therefore, this study develops a multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) framework for sustainable battery supplier selection for BSS. First, the existing evaluation criterion system is expanded by incorporating a technical criterion comprising four sub-criteria to achieve a more comprehensive assessment of suppliers. Then, interval type-2 fuzzy sets (IT2FSs) are introduced to determine the criteria weights and rate the alternatives, and this representation method could better address uncertainty in describing membership and non-membership functions, ensuring a precise reflection of expert opinions. Subsequently, in the application of cumulative prospect theory, the positive and negative ideal solutions are simultaneously considered to calculate the prospect values, thereby more accurately reflecting decision-makers' risk preferences in the decision-making process. Finally, a case study is implemented to demonstrate the application of the proposed approach. Sensitivity analysis verifies the stability, and comparative analysis illustrates its superiority.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":349,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cleaner Production","volume":"495 ","pages":"Article 145007"},"PeriodicalIF":10.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cleaner Production","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652625003579","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Facing worldwide climate change, governments are actively promoting the use of electric vehicles (EVs). A battery swapping station (BSS) is a great asset, as it is one of the most important infrastructures for the promotion of EVs, which has become more and more popular recently due to its convenience and efficiency. Considering the batteries as the kernel component of EVs, the prices of which occupy almost half of the total operational cost of an EV, directly affecting battery electric vehicle (BEV) penetration. Therefore, this study develops a multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) framework for sustainable battery supplier selection for BSS. First, the existing evaluation criterion system is expanded by incorporating a technical criterion comprising four sub-criteria to achieve a more comprehensive assessment of suppliers. Then, interval type-2 fuzzy sets (IT2FSs) are introduced to determine the criteria weights and rate the alternatives, and this representation method could better address uncertainty in describing membership and non-membership functions, ensuring a precise reflection of expert opinions. Subsequently, in the application of cumulative prospect theory, the positive and negative ideal solutions are simultaneously considered to calculate the prospect values, thereby more accurately reflecting decision-makers' risk preferences in the decision-making process. Finally, a case study is implemented to demonstrate the application of the proposed approach. Sensitivity analysis verifies the stability, and comparative analysis illustrates its superiority.
基于累积前景理论的区间2型模糊方法研究换电池站可持续电池供应商选择
面对全球气候变化,各国政府都在积极推动电动汽车的使用。电池交换站(BSS)是一项重要的资产,是推动电动汽车发展的重要基础设施之一,近年来,电动汽车因其便捷性和高效性越来越受到人们的欢迎。电池作为电动汽车的核心部件,其价格几乎占据了电动汽车总运营成本的一半,直接影响着纯电池电动汽车(BEV)的普及率。因此,本研究开发了一个多准则决策(MCDM)框架,用于BSS可持续电池供应商选择。首先,扩大现有的评价标准制度,纳入一项技术标准,其中包括四个分标准,以便对供应商进行更全面的评价。然后,引入区间2型模糊集(it2fs)来确定准则权重并对备选方案进行评级,该表示方法能够较好地解决描述隶属函数和非隶属函数的不确定性,保证专家意见的准确反映。随后,在应用累积前景理论时,同时考虑正理想解和负理想解来计算前景值,从而更准确地反映决策者在决策过程中的风险偏好。最后,通过案例分析验证了该方法的应用。灵敏度分析验证了该方法的稳定性,对比分析说明了该方法的优越性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Cleaner Production
Journal of Cleaner Production 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
20.40
自引率
9.00%
发文量
4720
审稿时长
111 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cleaner Production is an international, transdisciplinary journal that addresses and discusses theoretical and practical Cleaner Production, Environmental, and Sustainability issues. It aims to help societies become more sustainable by focusing on the concept of 'Cleaner Production', which aims at preventing waste production and increasing efficiencies in energy, water, resources, and human capital use. The journal serves as a platform for corporations, governments, education institutions, regions, and societies to engage in discussions and research related to Cleaner Production, environmental, and sustainability practices.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信