Efficacy of Flipped Classroom and Didactic Lecture Approaches in Undergraduate Respiratory Medicine Education.

IF 0.7 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-05 DOI:10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_1024_24
Ramesh Pandey, Satyendra Mishra, Manoj Sahu, Talha Saad, Nitu Mishra, Saumya Saxena
{"title":"Efficacy of Flipped Classroom and Didactic Lecture Approaches in Undergraduate Respiratory Medicine Education.","authors":"Ramesh Pandey, Satyendra Mishra, Manoj Sahu, Talha Saad, Nitu Mishra, Saumya Saxena","doi":"10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_1024_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study used a mixed-methods design, analyzing quantitative pre- and post-assessment scores alongside qualitative student feedback. Undergraduate students in Respiratory Medicine were randomly assigned to either the Flipped Classroom or Didactic Lecture groups.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The study compares the effectiveness and perceived impact of the Flipped Classroom versus Didactic Lecture approaches in Undergraduate Respiratory Medicine Education.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Flipped Classroom group showed significantly higher post-assessment scores and positive feedback, highlighting increased engagement, collaborative learning, and self-directed study.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study supports the effectiveness of the Flipped Classroom over traditional lectures, emphasizing active student involvement and personalized learning in Respiratory Medicine education.</p>","PeriodicalId":94339,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences","volume":"16 Suppl 4","pages":"S3547-S3549"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11805319/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_1024_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study used a mixed-methods design, analyzing quantitative pre- and post-assessment scores alongside qualitative student feedback. Undergraduate students in Respiratory Medicine were randomly assigned to either the Flipped Classroom or Didactic Lecture groups.

Method: The study compares the effectiveness and perceived impact of the Flipped Classroom versus Didactic Lecture approaches in Undergraduate Respiratory Medicine Education.

Results: The Flipped Classroom group showed significantly higher post-assessment scores and positive feedback, highlighting increased engagement, collaborative learning, and self-directed study.

Conclusion: The study supports the effectiveness of the Flipped Classroom over traditional lectures, emphasizing active student involvement and personalized learning in Respiratory Medicine education.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信