A randomized controlled clinical trial to compare the clinical outcome of random-based versus formula-based blood transfusion in a tertiary care hospital setting.

Prashant Pandey, Supriya Kumari, Gyanendra Agarwal, Shalendra Goel, Divya Setya, Saikat Mandal, Arghyadeep Marik, Mukesh Kumar Singh
{"title":"A randomized controlled clinical trial to compare the clinical outcome of random-based versus formula-based blood transfusion in a tertiary care hospital setting.","authors":"Prashant Pandey, Supriya Kumari, Gyanendra Agarwal, Shalendra Goel, Divya Setya, Saikat Mandal, Arghyadeep Marik, Mukesh Kumar Singh","doi":"10.1016/j.tracli.2025.02.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Red cell transfusion is the mainstay of therapy for anemia and it is important to transfuse adequate dosage of red cells to maintain tissue oxygen demands. Additionally, it is also important to avoid overload of red cells to prevent adverse effects. Therefore, we compared the rise in hemoglobin and hematocrit for random-Based transfusion (RBT) and formula-based blood transfusion (FBBT) among patients to get a better understanding of differences in clinical outcome between the two methods.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In this study 752 patients were included who were admitted in the hospital and required transfusion of a single unit of PRBC. Patients included in the study were randomized in two categories, RBT and FBBT, using stratified random sampling without any bias. In RBT category, patients received blood transfusion according to standard practice i.e. patient received the full red cell unit without any modifications in volume. All odd number request in cross-match register during the study period who fulfilled the eligibility were included in this group. In FBBT group, even numbered requests in the crossmatch register were randomized to receive FBBT. In this category, patients received transfusion according to the following formula: Volume of PRBCs to be transfused = TBV × (Desired Hct - Current Hct of patient)/ Hct of donor unit (where the desired rise of Hct is 3%).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In our study we found that the rise in hemoglobin and hematocrit levels were significantly higher for patients receiving FBBT as compared to the patients receiving RBT. Pre-transfusion hemoglobin and hematocrit did not have a significant difference whereas the post transfusion hemoglobin and hematocrit showed a higher rise in the FBBT group as compared to the RBT group. (Welch corrected t = 2.633, p value = 0.0086).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study re-emphasizes the value of FBBT over the routinely used RBT. This study found that FBBT had an edge over RBT, providing significantly higher increase in post-transfusion Hb and Hct. The authors therefore are of the opinion that use of FBBT may be considered in routine clinical practice to optimize transfusions for the patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":94255,"journal":{"name":"Transfusion clinique et biologique : journal de la Societe francaise de transfusion sanguine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transfusion clinique et biologique : journal de la Societe francaise de transfusion sanguine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tracli.2025.02.004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Red cell transfusion is the mainstay of therapy for anemia and it is important to transfuse adequate dosage of red cells to maintain tissue oxygen demands. Additionally, it is also important to avoid overload of red cells to prevent adverse effects. Therefore, we compared the rise in hemoglobin and hematocrit for random-Based transfusion (RBT) and formula-based blood transfusion (FBBT) among patients to get a better understanding of differences in clinical outcome between the two methods.

Materials and methods: In this study 752 patients were included who were admitted in the hospital and required transfusion of a single unit of PRBC. Patients included in the study were randomized in two categories, RBT and FBBT, using stratified random sampling without any bias. In RBT category, patients received blood transfusion according to standard practice i.e. patient received the full red cell unit without any modifications in volume. All odd number request in cross-match register during the study period who fulfilled the eligibility were included in this group. In FBBT group, even numbered requests in the crossmatch register were randomized to receive FBBT. In this category, patients received transfusion according to the following formula: Volume of PRBCs to be transfused = TBV × (Desired Hct - Current Hct of patient)/ Hct of donor unit (where the desired rise of Hct is 3%).

Results: In our study we found that the rise in hemoglobin and hematocrit levels were significantly higher for patients receiving FBBT as compared to the patients receiving RBT. Pre-transfusion hemoglobin and hematocrit did not have a significant difference whereas the post transfusion hemoglobin and hematocrit showed a higher rise in the FBBT group as compared to the RBT group. (Welch corrected t = 2.633, p value = 0.0086).

Conclusion: This study re-emphasizes the value of FBBT over the routinely used RBT. This study found that FBBT had an edge over RBT, providing significantly higher increase in post-transfusion Hb and Hct. The authors therefore are of the opinion that use of FBBT may be considered in routine clinical practice to optimize transfusions for the patients.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信