The utility of dynamic chest radiography in patients with asthma, COPD, COVID-19 and ILD: A pilot study.

IF 10.4 2区 医学 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Pulmonology Pub Date : 2025-12-31 Epub Date: 2025-02-10 DOI:10.1080/25310429.2024.2436274
Ryan E Robinson, Fred Fyles, Rachel C Burton, Amy Nuttall, Karl Hunter, Thomas S FitzMaurice, Reynaldo Martina, Diana Penha, Ram L Bedi, Hassan Burhan
{"title":"The utility of dynamic chest radiography in patients with asthma, COPD, COVID-19 and ILD: A pilot study.","authors":"Ryan E Robinson, Fred Fyles, Rachel C Burton, Amy Nuttall, Karl Hunter, Thomas S FitzMaurice, Reynaldo Martina, Diana Penha, Ram L Bedi, Hassan Burhan","doi":"10.1080/25310429.2024.2436274","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction and objectives: </strong>Assessment of breathlessness requires a combination of imaging and lung function testing. Dynamic digital radiography (DDR) of the thorax is an imaging technique that allows physiological and anatomical information to be gathered at the time of chest X-ray and has the potential to significantly streamline diagnostic pathways. The aims of this study were to investigate the acceptability of DDR to patients and explore the correlation between DDR-derived measurements with lung volumes measured using full pulmonary function tests (PFT).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We conducted a single-centre, prospective, pilot study of patients with confirmed asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), interstitial lung disease (ILD) or post-COVID-19 infection. Participants underwent DDR and paired PFT between March 2021 and August 2022. Dynamic digital radiography acceptability was measured using a 10-cm visual analogue scale (VAS). Point estimates and exact confidence intervals were used to evaluate participant preference. Digital dynamic radiography would be considered acceptable if the lower bound of the 95% confidence interval (exact) is greater than 50%. Pearson correlation (r) was used to explore associations between DDR measurements and PFT parameters.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>40 participants (asthma, <i>n</i> = 11; COPD, <i>n</i> = 9; ILD, <i>n</i> = 11; post-COVID, <i>n</i> = 9) had DDR with adequate image acquisition and PFT. Mean age of participants was 63.38 years (standard deviation 14.89) and 63% were male (25/40). The lower 95% confidence interval threshold for VAS acceptability was 92% for all groups combined and considered acceptable. The projected lung area at end inspiration (PLA<sub>insp</sub>) closely correlated with total lung capacity across all disease cohorts (<i>r</i> = 0.80, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and projected lung area at end expiration (PLA<sub>exp</sub>) was strongly correlated with residual volume in airways disease (COPD: <i>r</i> = 0.87, <i>p</i> = 0.003; asthma: <i>r</i> = 0.85, <i>p</i> = 0.002).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Dynamic digital radiography is an acceptable investigation for respiratory patients. DDR-derived measurements correlate with lung volumes obtained from PFTs. Larger studies are required to validate DDR as a possible method to identify and monitor air trapping in airways disease, allowing early detection and assessment of treatment effectiveness.</p>","PeriodicalId":54237,"journal":{"name":"Pulmonology","volume":"31 1","pages":"2436274"},"PeriodicalIF":10.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pulmonology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/25310429.2024.2436274","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction and objectives: Assessment of breathlessness requires a combination of imaging and lung function testing. Dynamic digital radiography (DDR) of the thorax is an imaging technique that allows physiological and anatomical information to be gathered at the time of chest X-ray and has the potential to significantly streamline diagnostic pathways. The aims of this study were to investigate the acceptability of DDR to patients and explore the correlation between DDR-derived measurements with lung volumes measured using full pulmonary function tests (PFT).

Materials and methods: We conducted a single-centre, prospective, pilot study of patients with confirmed asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), interstitial lung disease (ILD) or post-COVID-19 infection. Participants underwent DDR and paired PFT between March 2021 and August 2022. Dynamic digital radiography acceptability was measured using a 10-cm visual analogue scale (VAS). Point estimates and exact confidence intervals were used to evaluate participant preference. Digital dynamic radiography would be considered acceptable if the lower bound of the 95% confidence interval (exact) is greater than 50%. Pearson correlation (r) was used to explore associations between DDR measurements and PFT parameters.

Results: 40 participants (asthma, n = 11; COPD, n = 9; ILD, n = 11; post-COVID, n = 9) had DDR with adequate image acquisition and PFT. Mean age of participants was 63.38 years (standard deviation 14.89) and 63% were male (25/40). The lower 95% confidence interval threshold for VAS acceptability was 92% for all groups combined and considered acceptable. The projected lung area at end inspiration (PLAinsp) closely correlated with total lung capacity across all disease cohorts (r = 0.80, p < 0.001) and projected lung area at end expiration (PLAexp) was strongly correlated with residual volume in airways disease (COPD: r = 0.87, p = 0.003; asthma: r = 0.85, p = 0.002).

Conclusion: Dynamic digital radiography is an acceptable investigation for respiratory patients. DDR-derived measurements correlate with lung volumes obtained from PFTs. Larger studies are required to validate DDR as a possible method to identify and monitor air trapping in airways disease, allowing early detection and assessment of treatment effectiveness.

动态胸片在哮喘、COPD、COVID-19和ILD患者中的应用:一项初步研究
简介和目的:评估呼吸困难需要影像学检查和肺功能检查相结合。动态数字胸片(DDR)是一种成像技术,可以在胸部x线检查时收集生理和解剖信息,具有显著简化诊断途径的潜力。本研究的目的是调查患者对DDR的接受程度,并探讨DDR衍生的测量结果与全肺功能试验(PFT)测量的肺体积之间的相关性。材料和方法:我们对确诊为哮喘、慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)、间质性肺疾病(ILD)或covid -19感染后的患者进行了一项单中心、前瞻性、试点研究。参与者在2021年3月至2022年8月期间接受了DDR和配对PFT。采用10厘米视觉模拟量表(VAS)测量动态数字放射摄影可接受性。使用点估计和精确置信区间来评估参与者的偏好。如果95%置信区间(精确)的下界大于50%,则认为数字动态x线摄影是可以接受的。Pearson相关(r)用于探讨DDR测量值与PFT参数之间的关联。结果:40名受试者(哮喘,n = 11;COPD, n = 9;ILD, n = 11;covid后,n = 9)有DDR,具有足够的图像采集和PFT。参与者的平均年龄为63.38岁(标准差为14.89),63%为男性(25/40)。所有组的VAS可接受性的95%置信区间阈值为92%。在所有疾病队列中,终末吸气时肺投影面积(PLAinsp)与总肺活量密切相关(r = 0.80, p exp),与气道疾病的残气量密切相关(COPD: r = 0.87, p = 0.003;哮喘:r = 0.85, p = 0.002)。结论:动态数字x线摄影对呼吸系统患者是一种可接受的检查方法。ddr衍生的测量结果与pft获得的肺体积相关。需要更大规模的研究来验证DDR作为一种可能的方法来识别和监测气道疾病中的空气捕获,从而能够早期发现和评估治疗效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pulmonology
Pulmonology Medicine-Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
CiteScore
14.30
自引率
5.10%
发文量
159
审稿时长
19 days
期刊介绍: Pulmonology (previously Revista Portuguesa de Pneumologia) is the official journal of the Portuguese Society of Pulmonology (Sociedade Portuguesa de Pneumologia/SPP). The journal publishes 6 issues per year and focuses on respiratory system diseases in adults and clinical research. It accepts various types of articles including peer-reviewed original articles, review articles, editorials, and opinion articles. The journal is published in English and is freely accessible through its website, as well as Medline and other databases. It is indexed in Science Citation Index Expanded, Journal of Citation Reports, Index Medicus/MEDLINE, Scopus, and EMBASE/Excerpta Medica.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信