A Cost-effective Breath-hold Coaching Camera System for Patients Undergoing External Beam Radiotherapy.

IF 0.7 Q4 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Journal of Medical Physics Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-18 DOI:10.4103/jmp.jmp_101_24
Akash Mehta, Emma Horgan, Prabhakar Ramachandran, Christopher Noble
{"title":"A Cost-effective Breath-hold Coaching Camera System for Patients Undergoing External Beam Radiotherapy.","authors":"Akash Mehta, Emma Horgan, Prabhakar Ramachandran, Christopher Noble","doi":"10.4103/jmp.jmp_101_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Organ motion can significantly affect the accurate delivery of radiation doses to the tumor, particularly for sites such as the breast, lung, abdomen, and pelvis. Managing this motion during treatment is crucial. One strategy employed to manage motion induced from respiration is breath-hold (BH), which enhances the geometric precision of dose delivery. Our institute is transitioning to using the ExacTrac Dynamic system to facilitate patient BH using surface-guided cameras. Only 20% of our linacs are equipped with surface guidance capabilities, and due to a high patient stereotactic throughput, the ability to perform in-bunker coaching for BH patients within the bunker is limited. To address this challenge, a time-of-flight camera (ToF) was developed to coach radiotherapy patients undergoing BH procedures, allowing them to gain confidence in the process outside of the bunker and before treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The camera underwent testing for absolute and relative accuracy, responsiveness under various environmental conditions, and comparison with the Elekta Active Breathing Coordinator (ABC) to establish correlation and testing on volunteers independently to assess usability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results showed that the absolute distance measured by the camera was nonlinear due to square light modulation, which was retrospectively corrected. Relative accuracy was tested with a QUASAR motion phantom, with results agreeing to within ± 2 mm. The camera response was found to be unaffected by changes in lighting or temperature, though it overresponded under extreme temperatures. The comparison with the Elekta ABC system yielded comparable results between lung volume and changes in surface distance during BH. All volunteers successfully followed instructions and maintained BH within ± 1 mm tolerance.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study demonstrates the feasibility of using a cost-effective ToF camera to coach patients before imaging/treatment, saving valuable LINAC linac and imaging system time.</p>","PeriodicalId":51719,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Physics","volume":"49 4","pages":"502-509"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11801098/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jmp.jmp_101_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Organ motion can significantly affect the accurate delivery of radiation doses to the tumor, particularly for sites such as the breast, lung, abdomen, and pelvis. Managing this motion during treatment is crucial. One strategy employed to manage motion induced from respiration is breath-hold (BH), which enhances the geometric precision of dose delivery. Our institute is transitioning to using the ExacTrac Dynamic system to facilitate patient BH using surface-guided cameras. Only 20% of our linacs are equipped with surface guidance capabilities, and due to a high patient stereotactic throughput, the ability to perform in-bunker coaching for BH patients within the bunker is limited. To address this challenge, a time-of-flight camera (ToF) was developed to coach radiotherapy patients undergoing BH procedures, allowing them to gain confidence in the process outside of the bunker and before treatment.

Methods: The camera underwent testing for absolute and relative accuracy, responsiveness under various environmental conditions, and comparison with the Elekta Active Breathing Coordinator (ABC) to establish correlation and testing on volunteers independently to assess usability.

Results: The results showed that the absolute distance measured by the camera was nonlinear due to square light modulation, which was retrospectively corrected. Relative accuracy was tested with a QUASAR motion phantom, with results agreeing to within ± 2 mm. The camera response was found to be unaffected by changes in lighting or temperature, though it overresponded under extreme temperatures. The comparison with the Elekta ABC system yielded comparable results between lung volume and changes in surface distance during BH. All volunteers successfully followed instructions and maintained BH within ± 1 mm tolerance.

Conclusions: This study demonstrates the feasibility of using a cost-effective ToF camera to coach patients before imaging/treatment, saving valuable LINAC linac and imaging system time.

目的:器官运动会严重影响放射剂量对肿瘤的准确投放,尤其是在乳腺、肺部、腹部和骨盆等部位。在治疗过程中控制这种运动至关重要。管理呼吸引起的运动的一种策略是屏气(BH),它能提高剂量投放的几何精度。我们的研究所正在过渡到使用 ExacTrac Dynamic 系统,以便使用表面引导的摄像头为患者进行屏气治疗。我们只有20%的直列加速器配备了表面引导功能,而且由于患者立体定向吞吐量大,在舱内对BH患者进行舱内指导的能力有限。为了应对这一挑战,我们开发了一种飞行时间照相机(ToF),用于指导接受 BH 治疗的放疗患者,让他们在治疗前对掩体外的治疗过程充满信心:方法:对该相机进行了绝对和相对准确性、各种环境条件下的响应性测试,并与 Elekta 主动呼吸协调器(ABC)进行了比较,以建立相关性,还对志愿者进行了独立测试,以评估可用性:结果表明,由于方形光调制的影响,相机测量的绝对距离是非线性的,但经过回溯校正后,绝对距离已经得到纠正。使用 QUASAR 运动模型对相对准确性进行了测试,结果在 ± 2 毫米以内。研究发现,照相机的响应不受光照或温度变化的影响,但在极端温度下会过度响应。与 Elekta ABC 系统的比较结果显示,肺容积与 BH 期间表面距离的变化具有可比性。所有志愿者都成功地遵照指示,将 BH 值保持在 ± 1 毫米的误差范围内:这项研究证明了使用经济高效的 ToF 相机在成像/治疗前指导患者的可行性,从而节省了宝贵的 LINAC 直列加速器和成像系统时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Physics
Journal of Medical Physics RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
11.10%
发文量
55
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊介绍: JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS is the official journal of Association of Medical Physicists of India (AMPI). The association has been bringing out a quarterly publication since 1976. Till the end of 1993, it was known as Medical Physics Bulletin, which then became Journal of Medical Physics. The main objective of the Journal is to serve as a vehicle of communication to highlight all aspects of the practice of medical radiation physics. The areas covered include all aspects of the application of radiation physics to biological sciences, radiotherapy, radiodiagnosis, nuclear medicine, dosimetry and radiation protection. Papers / manuscripts dealing with the aspects of physics related to cancer therapy / radiobiology also fall within the scope of the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信