Talk of Family: How Institutional Overlap Shapes Family-Related Discourse Across Social Class.

IF 3.9 1区 社会学 Q1 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY
Jessica Halliday Hardie, Alina Arseniev-Koehler, Judith A Seltzer, Jacob G Foster
{"title":"Talk of Family: How Institutional Overlap Shapes Family-Related Discourse Across Social Class.","authors":"Jessica Halliday Hardie, Alina Arseniev-Koehler, Judith A Seltzer, Jacob G Foster","doi":"10.7758/rsf.2024.10.5.07","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We develop a novel application of machine learning and apply it to the interview transcripts from the American Voices Project (N = 1,396), using discourse atom topic modeling to explore social class variation in the centrality of family in adults' lives. We take a two-phase approach, first analyzing transcripts at the person level and then at the line level. Our findings suggest that family, as represented by talk, is more central in the lives of those without a college degree than among the college educated. However, the degree of institutional overlap between family and other key institutions-health, work, religion, and criminal justice-does not vary by education. We interpret these findings in the context of debates about the deinstitutionalization of family in the contemporary United States. This demonstrates the value of a new method for analyzing qualitative interview data at scale. We address ways to expand the use of this method to shed light on educational disparities.</p>","PeriodicalId":51709,"journal":{"name":"Rsf-The Russell Sage Journal of the Social Sciences","volume":"10 5","pages":"165-187"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11804896/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rsf-The Russell Sage Journal of the Social Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7758/rsf.2024.10.5.07","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We develop a novel application of machine learning and apply it to the interview transcripts from the American Voices Project (N = 1,396), using discourse atom topic modeling to explore social class variation in the centrality of family in adults' lives. We take a two-phase approach, first analyzing transcripts at the person level and then at the line level. Our findings suggest that family, as represented by talk, is more central in the lives of those without a college degree than among the college educated. However, the degree of institutional overlap between family and other key institutions-health, work, religion, and criminal justice-does not vary by education. We interpret these findings in the context of debates about the deinstitutionalization of family in the contemporary United States. This demonstrates the value of a new method for analyzing qualitative interview data at scale. We address ways to expand the use of this method to shed light on educational disparities.

谈论家庭:制度重叠如何塑造跨社会阶层的家庭相关话语。
我们开发了一种新的机器学习应用,并将其应用于来自美国之声项目(N = 1,396)的访谈记录,使用话语原子主题建模来探索社会阶层在成人生活中家庭中心地位的变化。我们采用两阶段的方法,首先在人员级别分析转录本,然后在行级别分析转录本。我们的研究结果表明,与受过大学教育的人相比,没有大学学历的人的生活中,以谈话为代表的家庭更为重要。然而,家庭制度与其他关键制度——健康、工作、宗教和刑事司法——之间的重叠程度并不因教育而异。我们在关于当代美国家庭去机构化的辩论的背景下解释这些发现。这证明了大规模分析定性访谈数据的新方法的价值。我们讨论了如何扩大这种方法的使用,以揭示教育差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Rsf-The Russell Sage Journal of the Social Sciences
Rsf-The Russell Sage Journal of the Social Sciences SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
43
审稿时长
53 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信