Giovanna Maria Gimenez Testa, Mariana Bueno de Oliveira Souza, Ângela Tavares Paes, Juliana Magdalon
{"title":"Students Outperform Faculty in Recognizing the Use of Active Learning Methods.","authors":"Giovanna Maria Gimenez Testa, Mariana Bueno de Oliveira Souza, Ângela Tavares Paes, Juliana Magdalon","doi":"10.1152/advan.00132.2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The implementation of active learning methods poses challenges for both instructors and students. Despite institutional support, some educators may encounter difficulties in effectively incorporating this methodology into their teaching practices. We hypothesized that one contributing factor could be the misguided self-perception regarding their class methodology. The objective of this study was to assess whether instructors and students can accurately recognize the application of active learning methods during classes and to identify the characteristics of these classes that influence the satisfaction of both educators and learners. A cross-sectional observational study was conducted during the emergency remote teaching caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. We examined 58 class sessions from a medical school program committed to active learning methodologies using an adapted version of the PORTAAL tool and administered post-class surveys to both instructors and students. Students, but not instructors, were able to accurately recognize the use of active learning methods. Additionally, class satisfaction reported by both instructors and students positively correlated with their self-perceived use of active learning method in the class, regardless of whether the perception was more accurate, as seen in the students' perceptions, or more inaccurate, as observed in instructors' misperceptions.</p>","PeriodicalId":50852,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Physiology Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Physiology Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00132.2024","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The implementation of active learning methods poses challenges for both instructors and students. Despite institutional support, some educators may encounter difficulties in effectively incorporating this methodology into their teaching practices. We hypothesized that one contributing factor could be the misguided self-perception regarding their class methodology. The objective of this study was to assess whether instructors and students can accurately recognize the application of active learning methods during classes and to identify the characteristics of these classes that influence the satisfaction of both educators and learners. A cross-sectional observational study was conducted during the emergency remote teaching caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. We examined 58 class sessions from a medical school program committed to active learning methodologies using an adapted version of the PORTAAL tool and administered post-class surveys to both instructors and students. Students, but not instructors, were able to accurately recognize the use of active learning methods. Additionally, class satisfaction reported by both instructors and students positively correlated with their self-perceived use of active learning method in the class, regardless of whether the perception was more accurate, as seen in the students' perceptions, or more inaccurate, as observed in instructors' misperceptions.
期刊介绍:
Advances in Physiology Education promotes and disseminates educational scholarship in order to enhance teaching and learning of physiology, neuroscience and pathophysiology. The journal publishes peer-reviewed descriptions of innovations that improve teaching in the classroom and laboratory, essays on education, and review articles based on our current understanding of physiological mechanisms. Submissions that evaluate new technologies for teaching and research, and educational pedagogy, are especially welcome. The audience for the journal includes educators at all levels: K–12, undergraduate, graduate, and professional programs.