Students Outperform Faculty in Recognizing the Use of Active Learning Methods.

IF 1.7 4区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Giovanna Maria Gimenez Testa, Mariana Bueno de Oliveira Souza, Ângela Tavares Paes, Juliana Magdalon
{"title":"Students Outperform Faculty in Recognizing the Use of Active Learning Methods.","authors":"Giovanna Maria Gimenez Testa, Mariana Bueno de Oliveira Souza, Ângela Tavares Paes, Juliana Magdalon","doi":"10.1152/advan.00132.2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The implementation of active learning methods poses challenges for both instructors and students. Despite institutional support, some educators may encounter difficulties in effectively incorporating this methodology into their teaching practices. We hypothesized that one contributing factor could be the misguided self-perception regarding their class methodology. The objective of this study was to assess whether instructors and students can accurately recognize the application of active learning methods during classes and to identify the characteristics of these classes that influence the satisfaction of both educators and learners. A cross-sectional observational study was conducted during the emergency remote teaching caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. We examined 58 class sessions from a medical school program committed to active learning methodologies using an adapted version of the PORTAAL tool and administered post-class surveys to both instructors and students. Students, but not instructors, were able to accurately recognize the use of active learning methods. Additionally, class satisfaction reported by both instructors and students positively correlated with their self-perceived use of active learning method in the class, regardless of whether the perception was more accurate, as seen in the students' perceptions, or more inaccurate, as observed in instructors' misperceptions.</p>","PeriodicalId":50852,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Physiology Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Physiology Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00132.2024","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The implementation of active learning methods poses challenges for both instructors and students. Despite institutional support, some educators may encounter difficulties in effectively incorporating this methodology into their teaching practices. We hypothesized that one contributing factor could be the misguided self-perception regarding their class methodology. The objective of this study was to assess whether instructors and students can accurately recognize the application of active learning methods during classes and to identify the characteristics of these classes that influence the satisfaction of both educators and learners. A cross-sectional observational study was conducted during the emergency remote teaching caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. We examined 58 class sessions from a medical school program committed to active learning methodologies using an adapted version of the PORTAAL tool and administered post-class surveys to both instructors and students. Students, but not instructors, were able to accurately recognize the use of active learning methods. Additionally, class satisfaction reported by both instructors and students positively correlated with their self-perceived use of active learning method in the class, regardless of whether the perception was more accurate, as seen in the students' perceptions, or more inaccurate, as observed in instructors' misperceptions.

主动学习法的实施对教师和学生都提出了挑战。尽管有机构的支持,但一些教育工作者在将这种方法有效地融入教学实践时可能会遇到困难。我们假设,其中一个因素可能是对课堂方法的自我认知存在误导。本研究的目的是评估教师和学生能否准确识别课堂上主动学习方法的应用,并找出影响教育者和学习者满意度的课堂特点。我们在 COVID-19 大流行引起的紧急远程教学期间进行了一项横断面观察研究。我们使用改编版的 PORTAAL 工具检查了医学院课程中采用主动学习方法的 58 节课,并对教师和学生进行了课后调查。结果显示,学生(而非教师)能够准确识别主动学习方法的使用情况。此外,指导教师和学生报告的课堂满意度与他们在课堂上使用主动学习方法的自我认知呈正相关,无论这种认知是更准确(如学生的认知),还是更不准确(如指导教师的错误认知)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
19.00%
发文量
100
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Advances in Physiology Education promotes and disseminates educational scholarship in order to enhance teaching and learning of physiology, neuroscience and pathophysiology. The journal publishes peer-reviewed descriptions of innovations that improve teaching in the classroom and laboratory, essays on education, and review articles based on our current understanding of physiological mechanisms. Submissions that evaluate new technologies for teaching and research, and educational pedagogy, are especially welcome. The audience for the journal includes educators at all levels: K–12, undergraduate, graduate, and professional programs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信