A prospective study on safety and clinical efficacy of rabies biologicals in paediatric patients with category III animal exposure.

IF 2.1 Q4 IMMUNOLOGY
Clinical and Experimental Vaccine Research Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-13 DOI:10.7774/cevr.2025.14.e1
Nidhi Fotedar, Haradanahalli Shankaraiah Ravish
{"title":"A prospective study on safety and clinical efficacy of rabies biologicals in paediatric patients with category III animal exposure.","authors":"Nidhi Fotedar, Haradanahalli Shankaraiah Ravish","doi":"10.7774/cevr.2025.14.e1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Rabies remains a significant public health concern worldwide, particularly among paediatric populations who are vulnerable to animal exposures. This prospective study aimed to assess the safety and clinical efficacy of rabies biologicals in pediatric patients following category III animal exposures.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A prospective study was undertaken enrolling 289 pediatric patients fulfilling eligibility criteria who presented with category III animal exposures at the anti-rabies clinic of Kempegowda Institute of Medical Sciences Hospital and Research Centre, Bangalore. All the subjects received rabies biologicals as per National Centre for Disease Control guidelines. The details pertaining to socio-demographic profile, biting animal, characteristics of wound, and details of post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) provided were recorded. All the study subjects were followed up for immediate and delayed adverse events (AEs). Subsequently, all were followed up for 6 months to demonstrate the clinical efficacy of PEP.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age of study subjects was 9.4 years, and most of them (43%) were going to school. Dog was the predominant biting animal (96.6%) with most bites being abrasions (45%), mainly on the lower limbs (42%). Single rabies monoclonal antibody was the most commonly administered passive immunization (67%), and purified Vero cell rabies vaccine was the predominant vaccine (65%). AEs following PEP were primarily local, predominantly pain (13.2%), and there were no systemic events. All the subjects were alive and healthy at the end of 6 months following PEP.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study contributes valuable insights into the safety and clinical efficacy of rabies biologicals in a pediatric cohort following category III animal exposures, supporting the continued use of these biologicals in pediatric patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":51768,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Vaccine Research","volume":"14 1","pages":"59-66"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11799581/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Experimental Vaccine Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7774/cevr.2025.14.e1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Rabies remains a significant public health concern worldwide, particularly among paediatric populations who are vulnerable to animal exposures. This prospective study aimed to assess the safety and clinical efficacy of rabies biologicals in pediatric patients following category III animal exposures.

Materials and methods: A prospective study was undertaken enrolling 289 pediatric patients fulfilling eligibility criteria who presented with category III animal exposures at the anti-rabies clinic of Kempegowda Institute of Medical Sciences Hospital and Research Centre, Bangalore. All the subjects received rabies biologicals as per National Centre for Disease Control guidelines. The details pertaining to socio-demographic profile, biting animal, characteristics of wound, and details of post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) provided were recorded. All the study subjects were followed up for immediate and delayed adverse events (AEs). Subsequently, all were followed up for 6 months to demonstrate the clinical efficacy of PEP.

Results: The mean age of study subjects was 9.4 years, and most of them (43%) were going to school. Dog was the predominant biting animal (96.6%) with most bites being abrasions (45%), mainly on the lower limbs (42%). Single rabies monoclonal antibody was the most commonly administered passive immunization (67%), and purified Vero cell rabies vaccine was the predominant vaccine (65%). AEs following PEP were primarily local, predominantly pain (13.2%), and there were no systemic events. All the subjects were alive and healthy at the end of 6 months following PEP.

Conclusion: This study contributes valuable insights into the safety and clinical efficacy of rabies biologicals in a pediatric cohort following category III animal exposures, supporting the continued use of these biologicals in pediatric patients.

狂犬病生物制剂对III类动物暴露的儿科患者的安全性和临床疗效的前瞻性研究。
目的:狂犬病仍然是世界范围内的一个重大公共卫生问题,特别是在易受动物接触的儿科人群中。本前瞻性研究旨在评估小儿狂犬病生物制剂在III类动物暴露后的安全性和临床疗效。材料和方法:在班加罗尔Kempegowda医学科学研究所医院和研究中心的抗狂犬病诊所进行了一项前瞻性研究,纳入了289名符合资格标准的儿童患者,这些患者出现了III类动物暴露。所有受试者均按照国家疾病控制中心的指导方针接受狂犬病生物制剂治疗。记录有关社会人口统计资料、咬伤动物、伤口特征以及提供的暴露后预防(PEP)细节。对所有研究对象进行即时和延迟不良事件(ae)随访。随访6个月,观察PEP的临床疗效。结果:研究对象的平均年龄为9.4岁,大部分(43%)正在上学。犬为主要咬伤动物(96.6%),以擦伤为主(45%),以下肢为主(42%)。狂犬病单克隆抗体是最常见的被动免疫(67%),纯化的Vero细胞狂犬病疫苗是主要的疫苗(65%)。PEP后的ae主要是局部的,主要是疼痛(13.2%),没有全身性事件。PEP后6个月结束时,所有受试者均健康存活。结论:本研究为狂犬病生物制剂在儿童III类动物暴露后的安全性和临床疗效提供了有价值的见解,支持在儿科患者中继续使用这些生物制剂。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
3.70%
发文量
29
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Clin Exp Vaccine Res, the official English journal of the Korean Vaccine Society, is an international, peer reviewed, and open-access journal. It covers all areas related to vaccines and vaccination. Clin Exp Vaccine Res publishes editorials, review articles, special articles, original articles, case reports, brief communications, and correspondences covering a wide range of clinical and experimental subjects including vaccines and vaccination for human and animals against infectious diseases caused by viruses, bacteria, parasites and tumor. The scope of the journal is to disseminate information that may contribute to elaborate vaccine development and vaccination strategies targeting infectious diseases and tumors in human and animals. Relevant topics range from experimental approaches to (pre)clinical trials for the vaccine research based on, but not limited to, basic laboratory, translational, and (pre)clinical investigations, epidemiology of infectious diseases and progression of all aspects in the health related issues. It is published printed and open accessed online issues (https://ecevr.org) two times per year in 31 January and 31 July. Clin Exp Vaccine Res is linked to many international databases and is made freely available to institutions and individuals worldwide
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信