Treatment Barrier in Overdose Crisis: A Critical Participatory Action Study of an Inpatient Smoking Ban.

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Casey Bohrman, Brie Radis, Brooke Feldman
{"title":"Treatment Barrier in Overdose Crisis: A Critical Participatory Action Study of an Inpatient Smoking Ban.","authors":"Casey Bohrman, Brie Radis, Brooke Feldman","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Amidst a national overdose epidemic some have expressed concerns that smoking bans in substance use treatment facilities could be a barrier to treatment. After the enactment of a smoking ban on treatment facilities in Philadelphia, university researchers partnered with a local syringe exchange to examine the impact of the ban on people with substance use disorders who were cigarette smokers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Utilizing a critical participatory action research approach, researchers used a convenience sample to access this hard-to-reach population through the syringe exchange and the organization's Facebook page. A sample of 112 individuals, including 80 men and 32 women completed an online survey asking about their utilization of inpatient treatment and the role of the smoking ban on entering treatment as well as leaving treatment early.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-four percent of respondents said that smoking had been a factor in past decisions about entering treatment and 50% said it would be a factor in future decisions. Of those who left inpatient treatment early, 85% said that smoking was a factor. University and community researchers used this data to help overturn the smoking ban at inpatient substance use treatment facilities.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Smoking bans in inpatient facilities may serve as a deterrent to entering treatment and may contribute to individuals leaving treatment early. Results from this study suggest that people with substance use disorders need to be included in policy development regarding smoking restrictions.</p>","PeriodicalId":46970,"journal":{"name":"Progress in Community Health Partnerships-Research Education and Action","volume":"18 4","pages":"471-480"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in Community Health Partnerships-Research Education and Action","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Amidst a national overdose epidemic some have expressed concerns that smoking bans in substance use treatment facilities could be a barrier to treatment. After the enactment of a smoking ban on treatment facilities in Philadelphia, university researchers partnered with a local syringe exchange to examine the impact of the ban on people with substance use disorders who were cigarette smokers.

Methods: Utilizing a critical participatory action research approach, researchers used a convenience sample to access this hard-to-reach population through the syringe exchange and the organization's Facebook page. A sample of 112 individuals, including 80 men and 32 women completed an online survey asking about their utilization of inpatient treatment and the role of the smoking ban on entering treatment as well as leaving treatment early.

Results: Forty-four percent of respondents said that smoking had been a factor in past decisions about entering treatment and 50% said it would be a factor in future decisions. Of those who left inpatient treatment early, 85% said that smoking was a factor. University and community researchers used this data to help overturn the smoking ban at inpatient substance use treatment facilities.

Conclusions: Smoking bans in inpatient facilities may serve as a deterrent to entering treatment and may contribute to individuals leaving treatment early. Results from this study suggest that people with substance use disorders need to be included in policy development regarding smoking restrictions.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
65
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信