Histopathological diagnosis of microvascular invasion in hepatocellular carcinoma: Is it reliable?

IF 4.3 3区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Liu-Jun Li, Chao-Qun Wu, Fei-Le Ye, Zhou Xuan, Xiao-Li Zhang, Jian-Ping Li, Jia Zhou, Zhong-Zhen Su
{"title":"Histopathological diagnosis of microvascular invasion in hepatocellular carcinoma: Is it reliable?","authors":"Liu-Jun Li, Chao-Qun Wu, Fei-Le Ye, Zhou Xuan, Xiao-Li Zhang, Jian-Ping Li, Jia Zhou, Zhong-Zhen Su","doi":"10.3748/wjg.v31.i5.98928","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Microvascular invasion (MVI) is a critical prognostic factor for postoperative hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence, but the reliability of its current pathological diagnosis remains uncertain.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate the accuracy of current 7-point sampling methods and propose an optimal pathological protocol using whole-mount slide imaging (WSI) for better MVI detection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We utilized 40 New Zealand white rabbits to establish VX2 liver tumor models. The entire tumor-containing liver lobe was subsequently obtained, following which five different sampling protocols (A-E) were employed to evaluate the detection rate, accuracy, quantity, and distribution of MVI, with the aim of identifying the optimal sampling method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>VX2 liver tumor models were successfully established in 37 rabbits, with an incidence of MVI of 81.1% (30/37). The detection rates [27% (10/37), 43% (16/37), 62% (23/37), 68% (25/37), and 93% (14/15)] and quantity (15, 36, 107, 125, and 395) of MVI increased significantly from protocols A to E. The distribution of MVI showed fewer MVIs farther away from the tumor, but the percentage of MVI detected quantity gradually increased from 6.7% to 48.3% in the distant nonneoplastic liver tissue from protocols A to E. Protocol C was identified as the optimal sampling method by comparing them in sequence. The sampling protocol of three consecutive interval WSIs at the tumor center (WSI<sub>3</sub>) was further screened to determine the optimal number of WSIs. Protocol A (7-point sampling method) exhibited only 46% accuracy and a high false-negative rate of 67%. Notably, the WSI<sub>3</sub> protocol improved the accuracy to 78% and decreased the false-negative rate to 27%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The current 7-point sampling method has a high false-negative rate in MVI detection. In contrast, the WSI<sub>3</sub> protocol provides a practical and effective approach to improve MVI diagnostic accuracy, which is crucial for hepatocellular carcinoma diagnosis and treatment planning.</p>","PeriodicalId":23778,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Gastroenterology","volume":"31 5","pages":"98928"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11718611/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v31.i5.98928","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Microvascular invasion (MVI) is a critical prognostic factor for postoperative hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence, but the reliability of its current pathological diagnosis remains uncertain.

Aim: To evaluate the accuracy of current 7-point sampling methods and propose an optimal pathological protocol using whole-mount slide imaging (WSI) for better MVI detection.

Methods: We utilized 40 New Zealand white rabbits to establish VX2 liver tumor models. The entire tumor-containing liver lobe was subsequently obtained, following which five different sampling protocols (A-E) were employed to evaluate the detection rate, accuracy, quantity, and distribution of MVI, with the aim of identifying the optimal sampling method.

Results: VX2 liver tumor models were successfully established in 37 rabbits, with an incidence of MVI of 81.1% (30/37). The detection rates [27% (10/37), 43% (16/37), 62% (23/37), 68% (25/37), and 93% (14/15)] and quantity (15, 36, 107, 125, and 395) of MVI increased significantly from protocols A to E. The distribution of MVI showed fewer MVIs farther away from the tumor, but the percentage of MVI detected quantity gradually increased from 6.7% to 48.3% in the distant nonneoplastic liver tissue from protocols A to E. Protocol C was identified as the optimal sampling method by comparing them in sequence. The sampling protocol of three consecutive interval WSIs at the tumor center (WSI3) was further screened to determine the optimal number of WSIs. Protocol A (7-point sampling method) exhibited only 46% accuracy and a high false-negative rate of 67%. Notably, the WSI3 protocol improved the accuracy to 78% and decreased the false-negative rate to 27%.

Conclusion: The current 7-point sampling method has a high false-negative rate in MVI detection. In contrast, the WSI3 protocol provides a practical and effective approach to improve MVI diagnostic accuracy, which is crucial for hepatocellular carcinoma diagnosis and treatment planning.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
World Journal of Gastroenterology
World Journal of Gastroenterology 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
4.70%
发文量
464
审稿时长
2.4 months
期刊介绍: The primary aims of the WJG are to improve diagnostic, therapeutic and preventive modalities and the skills of clinicians and to guide clinical practice in gastroenterology and hepatology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信