Analytic and Monte Carlo calculations of dose-mean lineal energy for 1 MeV-1 GeV protons with application to radiation protection quality factor.

IF 1.5 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 BIOLOGY
Alexis Papadopoulos, Ioanna Kyriakou, Yusuke Matsuya, Miguel Antonio Cortés-Giraldo, Miguel Galocha-Oliva, Ianik Plante, Robert D Stewart, Ngoc Hoang Tran, Weibo Li, Ioannis A Daglis, Giovanni Santin, Petteri Nieminen, Sebastien Incerti, Dimitris Emfietzoglou
{"title":"Analytic and Monte Carlo calculations of dose-mean lineal energy for 1 MeV-1 GeV protons with application to radiation protection quality factor.","authors":"Alexis Papadopoulos, Ioanna Kyriakou, Yusuke Matsuya, Miguel Antonio Cortés-Giraldo, Miguel Galocha-Oliva, Ianik Plante, Robert D Stewart, Ngoc Hoang Tran, Weibo Li, Ioannis A Daglis, Giovanni Santin, Petteri Nieminen, Sebastien Incerti, Dimitris Emfietzoglou","doi":"10.1007/s00411-025-01110-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Radiation quality for determining biological effects is commonly linked to the microdosimetric quantity lineal energy ( <math><mi>y</mi></math> ) and to the dose-mean lineal energy ( <math><msub><mi>y</mi> <mtext>D</mtext></msub> </math> ). Calculations of <math><msub><mi>y</mi> <mtext>D</mtext></msub> </math> are typically performed by specialised Monte Carlo track-structure (MCTS) codes, which can be time-intensive. Thus, microdosimetry-based analytic models are potentially useful for practical calculations. Analytic model calculations of proton <math><msub><mi>y</mi> <mtext>D</mtext></msub> </math> and radiation protection quality factor ( <math><mi>Q</mi></math> ) values in sub-micron liquid water spheres (diameter 10-1000 nm) over a broad energy range (1 MeV-1 GeV) are compared against MCTS simulations by PHITS, RITRACKS, and Geant4-DNA. Additionally, an improved analytic microdosimetry model is proposed. The original analytic model of Xapsos is refined and model parameters are updated based on Geant4-DNA physics model. Direct proton energy deposition is described by an alternative energy-loss straggling distribution and the contribution of secondary electrons is calculated using the dielectric formulation of the relativistic Born approximation. MCTS simulations of proton <math><msub><mi>y</mi> <mtext>D</mtext></msub> </math> values using the latest versions of the PHITS, RITRACKS, and Geant4-DNA are reported along with the Monte Carlo Damage Simulation (MCDS) algorithm. The <math><msub><mi>y</mi> <mtext>D</mtext></msub> </math> datasets are then used within the Theory of Dual Radiation Action (TDRA) to illustrate variations in <math><mi>Q</mi></math> with proton energy. By a careful selection of parameters, overall differences at the ~ 10% level between the proposed analytic model and the MCTS codes can be attained, significantly improving upon existing models. MCDS estimates of <math><msub><mi>y</mi> <mtext>D</mtext></msub> </math> are generally much lower than estimates from MCTS simulations. The differences of <math><mi>Q</mi></math> among the examined methods are somewhat smaller than those of <math><msub><mi>y</mi> <mtext>D</mtext></msub> </math> . Still, estimates of proton <math><mi>Q</mi></math> values by the present model are in better agreement with MCTS-based estimates than the existing analytic models. An improved microdosimetry-based analytic model is presented for calculating proton <math><msub><mi>y</mi> <mtext>D</mtext></msub> </math> values over a broad range of proton energies (1 MeV-1 GeV) and target sizes (10-1000 nm) in very good agreement with state-of-the-art MCTS simulations. It is envisioned that the proposed model might be used as an alternative to CPU-intensive MCTS simulations and advance practical microdosimetry and quality factor calculations in medical, accelerator, and space radiation applications.</p>","PeriodicalId":21002,"journal":{"name":"Radiation and Environmental Biophysics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiation and Environmental Biophysics","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00411-025-01110-w","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Radiation quality for determining biological effects is commonly linked to the microdosimetric quantity lineal energy ( y ) and to the dose-mean lineal energy ( y D ). Calculations of y D are typically performed by specialised Monte Carlo track-structure (MCTS) codes, which can be time-intensive. Thus, microdosimetry-based analytic models are potentially useful for practical calculations. Analytic model calculations of proton y D and radiation protection quality factor ( Q ) values in sub-micron liquid water spheres (diameter 10-1000 nm) over a broad energy range (1 MeV-1 GeV) are compared against MCTS simulations by PHITS, RITRACKS, and Geant4-DNA. Additionally, an improved analytic microdosimetry model is proposed. The original analytic model of Xapsos is refined and model parameters are updated based on Geant4-DNA physics model. Direct proton energy deposition is described by an alternative energy-loss straggling distribution and the contribution of secondary electrons is calculated using the dielectric formulation of the relativistic Born approximation. MCTS simulations of proton y D values using the latest versions of the PHITS, RITRACKS, and Geant4-DNA are reported along with the Monte Carlo Damage Simulation (MCDS) algorithm. The y D datasets are then used within the Theory of Dual Radiation Action (TDRA) to illustrate variations in Q with proton energy. By a careful selection of parameters, overall differences at the ~ 10% level between the proposed analytic model and the MCTS codes can be attained, significantly improving upon existing models. MCDS estimates of y D are generally much lower than estimates from MCTS simulations. The differences of Q among the examined methods are somewhat smaller than those of y D . Still, estimates of proton Q values by the present model are in better agreement with MCTS-based estimates than the existing analytic models. An improved microdosimetry-based analytic model is presented for calculating proton y D values over a broad range of proton energies (1 MeV-1 GeV) and target sizes (10-1000 nm) in very good agreement with state-of-the-art MCTS simulations. It is envisioned that the proposed model might be used as an alternative to CPU-intensive MCTS simulations and advance practical microdosimetry and quality factor calculations in medical, accelerator, and space radiation applications.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
5.90%
发文量
53
审稿时长
>36 weeks
期刊介绍: This journal is devoted to fundamental and applied issues in radiation research and biophysics. The topics may include: Biophysics of ionizing radiation: radiation physics and chemistry, radiation dosimetry, radiobiology, radioecology, biophysical foundations of medical applications of radiation, and radiation protection. Biological effects of radiation: experimental or theoretical work on molecular or cellular effects; relevance of biological effects for risk assessment; biological effects of medical applications of radiation; relevance of radiation for biosphere and in space; modelling of ecosystems; modelling of transport processes of substances in biotic systems. Risk assessment: epidemiological studies of cancer and non-cancer effects; quantification of risk including exposures to radiation and confounding factors Contributions to these topics may include theoretical-mathematical and experimental material, as well as description of new techniques relevant for the study of these issues. They can range from complex radiobiological phenomena to issues in health physics and environmental protection.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信