Analysis of risk factors for death during treatment of hemodynamically unstable pelvic fractures.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Dazhi Wang, Jungang Xiao, Kaifu Zheng
{"title":"Analysis of risk factors for death during treatment of hemodynamically unstable pelvic fractures.","authors":"Dazhi Wang, Jungang Xiao, Kaifu Zheng","doi":"10.12669/pjms.41.2.9808","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To analyze the risk factors associated with the occurrence of death during the treatment of patients with hemodynamically unstable pelvic fractures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The present study is a retrospective research design, which selected 136 patients with hemodynamically unstable pelvic fractures admitted to China Resource & WISCO General Hospital from March 2020 to March 2022 as the subjects of the study. They were divided into a survival group (113 cases) and a death group (23 cases) according to whether the patients died during treatment. The general clinical data and laboratory test indexes of the two groups were compared to analyze the risk factors affecting the death of pelvic fracture patients. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves were plotted, and the area under the curve was calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The two groups were significantly different in aspects of age, systolic blood pressure, rapid emergency medicine score, injury severity score (ISS), sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score, prothrombin time, activated partial thromboplastin time, and percentages of patients with bleeding volume > 2,000 mL, shock index > 2, and minimum oxygenation index < 200 (P<0.05). Logistic regression analysis suggested that shock index > 2, ISS, SOFA score, and bleeding volume > 2,000 mL were independent risk factors for patient death. ROC analysis showed that the area under the curve for shock index > 2, ISS, SOFA score, and bleeding volume > 2,000 mL was 0.656, 0.732, 0.907, and 0.798, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Severe shock, increased ISS and SOFA score, and bleeding are independent risk factors for death in patients with hemodynamically unstable pelvic fractures. Implementation of rapid and efficient targeted management during treatment of high-risk patients with these factors is key to reducing their risk of death.</p>","PeriodicalId":19958,"journal":{"name":"Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences","volume":"41 2","pages":"559-563"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11803767/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.41.2.9808","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To analyze the risk factors associated with the occurrence of death during the treatment of patients with hemodynamically unstable pelvic fractures.

Methods: The present study is a retrospective research design, which selected 136 patients with hemodynamically unstable pelvic fractures admitted to China Resource & WISCO General Hospital from March 2020 to March 2022 as the subjects of the study. They were divided into a survival group (113 cases) and a death group (23 cases) according to whether the patients died during treatment. The general clinical data and laboratory test indexes of the two groups were compared to analyze the risk factors affecting the death of pelvic fracture patients. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves were plotted, and the area under the curve was calculated.

Results: The two groups were significantly different in aspects of age, systolic blood pressure, rapid emergency medicine score, injury severity score (ISS), sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score, prothrombin time, activated partial thromboplastin time, and percentages of patients with bleeding volume > 2,000 mL, shock index > 2, and minimum oxygenation index < 200 (P<0.05). Logistic regression analysis suggested that shock index > 2, ISS, SOFA score, and bleeding volume > 2,000 mL were independent risk factors for patient death. ROC analysis showed that the area under the curve for shock index > 2, ISS, SOFA score, and bleeding volume > 2,000 mL was 0.656, 0.732, 0.907, and 0.798, respectively.

Conclusions: Severe shock, increased ISS and SOFA score, and bleeding are independent risk factors for death in patients with hemodynamically unstable pelvic fractures. Implementation of rapid and efficient targeted management during treatment of high-risk patients with these factors is key to reducing their risk of death.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences
Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
9.10%
发文量
363
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: It is a peer reviewed medical journal published regularly since 1984. It was previously known as quarterly "SPECIALIST" till December 31st 1999. It publishes original research articles, review articles, current practices, short communications & case reports. It attracts manuscripts not only from within Pakistan but also from over fifty countries from abroad. Copies of PJMS are sent to all the import medical libraries all over Pakistan and overseas particularly in South East Asia and Asia Pacific besides WHO EMRO Region countries. Eminent members of the medical profession at home and abroad regularly contribute their write-ups, manuscripts in our publications. We pursue an independent editorial policy, which allows an opportunity to the healthcare professionals to express their views without any fear or favour. That is why many opinion makers among the medical and pharmaceutical profession use this publication to communicate their viewpoint.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信