"Active Larynx": Preliminary Evaluation of the Reliability of Visual Assessments of Laryngeal Inflammation.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Prasanth Pattisapu, Amy M Manning, Michael J Boutros, Megan McNutt, Tendy Chiang, Jonathan M Grischkan, Meredith N Lind, John F P Bridges
{"title":"\"Active Larynx\": Preliminary Evaluation of the Reliability of Visual Assessments of Laryngeal Inflammation.","authors":"Prasanth Pattisapu, Amy M Manning, Michael J Boutros, Megan McNutt, Tendy Chiang, Jonathan M Grischkan, Meredith N Lind, John F P Bridges","doi":"10.1002/ohn.1155","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The term \"active larynx\" is a nonspecific and subjective term used by otolaryngologists to describe laryngeal inflammation that can influence the timing of airway reconstruction. We sought to measure the reliability of visual assessments of laryngeal inflammation for later scale development.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>A cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Pediatric tertiary care center.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We created an image library from a direct laryngoscopy and bronchoscopy database. Blinded judges were asked to rate the characteristics of laryngeal inflammation (edema, erythema, cobblestoned appearance, and ventricular eversion; 5-point Likert scale), the overall \"activeness\" of the larynx (10-point scale), and whether laryngeal inflammation would influence a delay in reconstructive surgery (yes/no). A tentative scale was also constructed. Intraclass correlations with 2-way random effects, and Fleiss's κ were used to evaluate interrater reliability. The convergent and discriminant validity of the tentative scale were measured.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three pediatric otolaryngologists reviewed 15 larynges for a total of 45 image ratings. Intraclass coefficients indicated substantial agreement for edema (0.76) and erythema (0.83) and moderate agreement for ventricular eversion (0.58). Cobblestoning had low agreement (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] < 0.20). The agreement was substantial for overall \"activeness\" (ICC 0.76) and moderate for whether inflammation would delay surgery (ICC 0.47). By Fleiss's κ, edema and erythema had moderate agreement (0.50 and 0.61, respectively), whereas all others had poor agreement. The convergent and discriminant validity of the tentative scale were reassuring.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While the reliability of laryngeal inflammation by visual assessment is variable, the creation of an active larynx scale appears feasible.</p>","PeriodicalId":19707,"journal":{"name":"Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ohn.1155","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The term "active larynx" is a nonspecific and subjective term used by otolaryngologists to describe laryngeal inflammation that can influence the timing of airway reconstruction. We sought to measure the reliability of visual assessments of laryngeal inflammation for later scale development.

Study design: A cross-sectional study.

Setting: Pediatric tertiary care center.

Methods: We created an image library from a direct laryngoscopy and bronchoscopy database. Blinded judges were asked to rate the characteristics of laryngeal inflammation (edema, erythema, cobblestoned appearance, and ventricular eversion; 5-point Likert scale), the overall "activeness" of the larynx (10-point scale), and whether laryngeal inflammation would influence a delay in reconstructive surgery (yes/no). A tentative scale was also constructed. Intraclass correlations with 2-way random effects, and Fleiss's κ were used to evaluate interrater reliability. The convergent and discriminant validity of the tentative scale were measured.

Results: Three pediatric otolaryngologists reviewed 15 larynges for a total of 45 image ratings. Intraclass coefficients indicated substantial agreement for edema (0.76) and erythema (0.83) and moderate agreement for ventricular eversion (0.58). Cobblestoning had low agreement (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] < 0.20). The agreement was substantial for overall "activeness" (ICC 0.76) and moderate for whether inflammation would delay surgery (ICC 0.47). By Fleiss's κ, edema and erythema had moderate agreement (0.50 and 0.61, respectively), whereas all others had poor agreement. The convergent and discriminant validity of the tentative scale were reassuring.

Conclusion: While the reliability of laryngeal inflammation by visual assessment is variable, the creation of an active larynx scale appears feasible.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery
Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
2.90%
发文量
250
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery (OTO-HNS) is the official peer-reviewed publication of the American Academy of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery Foundation. The mission of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery is to publish contemporary, ethical, clinically relevant information in otolaryngology, head and neck surgery (ear, nose, throat, head, and neck disorders) that can be used by otolaryngologists, clinicians, scientists, and specialists to improve patient care and public health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信