Prospective relationships between left ventricular mass, brachial and central blood pressures in participants from the UK Biobank.

IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q1 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Journal of Hypertension Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-23 DOI:10.1097/HJH.0000000000003969
James E Sharman, Fumihiko Takeuchi, Athanase Protogerou, Thomas Weber, Siegfried Wassertheurer, Thomas H Marwick
{"title":"Prospective relationships between left ventricular mass, brachial and central blood pressures in participants from the UK Biobank.","authors":"James E Sharman, Fumihiko Takeuchi, Athanase Protogerou, Thomas Weber, Siegfried Wassertheurer, Thomas H Marwick","doi":"10.1097/HJH.0000000000003969","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Central SBP purports to aid hypertension management. This concept is founded on cross-sectional studies; however, findings are mixed and few report longitudinal relationships between changes in blood pressure (BP) and outcomes. This study aimed to determine associations of changes in brachial BP and central BP with changes in left ventricular mass index (LVMi), as an important hypertension-related clinical outcome.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Standard brachial BP and central BP (Vicorder, Skidmore Medical, UK; a type 1 device, using SBP/DBP calibration) were measured at the same time as cardiac MRI for LVMi among adults from the UK Biobank Cohort Study assessed prospectively at two time points (2014+ and 2019+). Analysis was by linear regression adjusted for demographic and clinical characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data were evaluable for 681 participants (aged 50.1 ± 7.1 years, 54% women) followed over 3.2 ± 1.6 years [mean ± standard deviation (SD)]. Cross-sectional analysis showed the association of brachial SBP with LVMi [ β  ± standard error (SE) 3.47 × 10 -2  ± 6.39 × 10 -3  g/m 2.7 /mmHg] and central SBP with LVMi ( β  ± SE = 3.52 × 10 -2  ± 6.40 × 10 -3  g/m 2.7 /mmHg) were comparable ( P  < 0.001 both). In longitudinal analysis, associations between the changes in BP and changes in LVMi were identical for both central and brachial SBP ( β  ± SE = 0.011 ± 0.003 g/m 2.7 /mmHg; P  < 0.001 both). Findings were unchanged if participants were stratified by age, LVMi quartile, BP category or central BP phenotype.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Changes over time in standard brachial BP provide similar information to central BP on changes over time in LVMi. Whether these findings are generalizable must be further investigated in other cohorts and by other types of central BP devices.</p>","PeriodicalId":16043,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hypertension","volume":" ","pages":"698-704"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hypertension","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/HJH.0000000000003969","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Central SBP purports to aid hypertension management. This concept is founded on cross-sectional studies; however, findings are mixed and few report longitudinal relationships between changes in blood pressure (BP) and outcomes. This study aimed to determine associations of changes in brachial BP and central BP with changes in left ventricular mass index (LVMi), as an important hypertension-related clinical outcome.

Methods: Standard brachial BP and central BP (Vicorder, Skidmore Medical, UK; a type 1 device, using SBP/DBP calibration) were measured at the same time as cardiac MRI for LVMi among adults from the UK Biobank Cohort Study assessed prospectively at two time points (2014+ and 2019+). Analysis was by linear regression adjusted for demographic and clinical characteristics.

Results: Data were evaluable for 681 participants (aged 50.1 ± 7.1 years, 54% women) followed over 3.2 ± 1.6 years [mean ± standard deviation (SD)]. Cross-sectional analysis showed the association of brachial SBP with LVMi [ β  ± standard error (SE) 3.47 × 10 -2  ± 6.39 × 10 -3  g/m 2.7 /mmHg] and central SBP with LVMi ( β  ± SE = 3.52 × 10 -2  ± 6.40 × 10 -3  g/m 2.7 /mmHg) were comparable ( P  < 0.001 both). In longitudinal analysis, associations between the changes in BP and changes in LVMi were identical for both central and brachial SBP ( β  ± SE = 0.011 ± 0.003 g/m 2.7 /mmHg; P  < 0.001 both). Findings were unchanged if participants were stratified by age, LVMi quartile, BP category or central BP phenotype.

Conclusion: Changes over time in standard brachial BP provide similar information to central BP on changes over time in LVMi. Whether these findings are generalizable must be further investigated in other cohorts and by other types of central BP devices.

英国生物银行参与者左心室质量、肱动脉和中枢血压之间的前瞻性关系。
背景:中央收缩压旨在帮助高血压管理。这个概念是建立在横断面研究的基础上的;然而,研究结果喜忧参半,很少有关于血压(BP)变化与预后之间的纵向关系的报道。本研究旨在确定臂BP和中央BP变化与左心室质量指数(LVMi)变化的关系,LVMi是高血压相关的重要临床指标。方法:标准肱血压和中央血压(Vicorder, Skidmore Medical, UK;在英国生物库队列研究中,在两个时间点(2014+和2019+)对成人LVMi进行前瞻性评估,同时对心脏MRI进行测量。分析采用线性回归调整人口统计学和临床特征。结果:681名参与者(年龄50.1±7.1岁,54%为女性)随访3.2±1.6年[平均±标准差(SD)],数据可评估。横断面分析显示肱动脉收缩压与LVMi的相关性[β±标准误差(SE) 3.47 × 10-2±6.39 × 10-3 g/m2.7/mmHg]和中枢性收缩压与LVMi的相关性(β±SE = 3.52 × 10-2±6.40 × 10-3 g/m2.7/mmHg)具有可比性(P结论:标准肱动脉收缩压随时间的变化与中枢性血压随时间的变化提供了LVMi变化的相似信息。这些发现是否具有普遍性,必须在其他队列和其他类型的中枢BP装置中进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Hypertension
Journal of Hypertension 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
6.10%
发文量
1389
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Hypertension publishes papers reporting original clinical and experimental research which are of a high standard and which contribute to the advancement of knowledge in the field of hypertension. The Journal publishes full papers, reviews or editorials (normally by invitation), and correspondence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信