Multiresolution comparison of fetal real-time and CINE MRI at 0.55T.

IF 4.2 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Datta Singh Goolaub, Ye Tian, Joshua F P van Amerom, John Wood, Jon Detterich, Krishna S Nayak, Christopher K Macgowan
{"title":"Multiresolution comparison of fetal real-time and CINE MRI at 0.55T.","authors":"Datta Singh Goolaub, Ye Tian, Joshua F P van Amerom, John Wood, Jon Detterich, Krishna S Nayak, Christopher K Macgowan","doi":"10.1016/j.jocmr.2025.101856","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dynamic fetal cardiovascular MRI (CMR) enables visualization of moving structures to assess congenital heart disease and plan treatment. Low field MRI systems can provide more comfortable platforms for fetal CMR.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To demonstrate the feasibility and utility of motion corrected fetal cardiac cine CMR and compare it with real-time CMR at multiple spatial resolutions at 0.55T.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>10 human pregnancies were scanned at 0.55T (derated Siemens Aera) with spiral steady-state free precession imaging. Real-time images were reconstructed and used for motion correction and fetal cardiac gating followed by cine reconstructions. The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), image quality, blood-to-myocardium contrast, and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) from real-time and cine reconstructions were compared. The effect of acceleration on cine accuracy was assessed by retrospectively undersampling the data and measuring the reconstruction error with the normalized root-mean-squared difference (NRMSD) in 5 fetuses. Reproducibility of the measurements was assessed by reconstructing cines from 2 independent windows of data and computing the NRMSD relative to the reference image in 5 fetuses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The SNR, CNR, and image quality were better for cines than their corresponding real-time reconstructions. The blood-to-myocardium contrast had no significant difference between real-time and cine reconstructions. With finer spatial resolution, real-time images degraded, and cardiac structures were less conspicuous. NRMSD in cines decreased with increasing scan times across all resolutions (NRMSD = 10 ± 2% for 7s scan duration). Good consistency (NRMSD = 11 ± 3%) was achieved between independent reconstruction windows.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While this study was performed on an experimental scanner (derated; not commercially available), we have shown that fetal cine CMR is feasible at 0.55T and provide high quality fetal cardiac images at high spatiotemporal resolutions.</p>","PeriodicalId":15221,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance","volume":" ","pages":"101856"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocmr.2025.101856","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Dynamic fetal cardiovascular MRI (CMR) enables visualization of moving structures to assess congenital heart disease and plan treatment. Low field MRI systems can provide more comfortable platforms for fetal CMR.

Objectives: To demonstrate the feasibility and utility of motion corrected fetal cardiac cine CMR and compare it with real-time CMR at multiple spatial resolutions at 0.55T.

Methods: 10 human pregnancies were scanned at 0.55T (derated Siemens Aera) with spiral steady-state free precession imaging. Real-time images were reconstructed and used for motion correction and fetal cardiac gating followed by cine reconstructions. The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), image quality, blood-to-myocardium contrast, and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) from real-time and cine reconstructions were compared. The effect of acceleration on cine accuracy was assessed by retrospectively undersampling the data and measuring the reconstruction error with the normalized root-mean-squared difference (NRMSD) in 5 fetuses. Reproducibility of the measurements was assessed by reconstructing cines from 2 independent windows of data and computing the NRMSD relative to the reference image in 5 fetuses.

Results: The SNR, CNR, and image quality were better for cines than their corresponding real-time reconstructions. The blood-to-myocardium contrast had no significant difference between real-time and cine reconstructions. With finer spatial resolution, real-time images degraded, and cardiac structures were less conspicuous. NRMSD in cines decreased with increasing scan times across all resolutions (NRMSD = 10 ± 2% for 7s scan duration). Good consistency (NRMSD = 11 ± 3%) was achieved between independent reconstruction windows.

Conclusion: While this study was performed on an experimental scanner (derated; not commercially available), we have shown that fetal cine CMR is feasible at 0.55T and provide high quality fetal cardiac images at high spatiotemporal resolutions.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
12.50%
发文量
61
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (JCMR) publishes high-quality articles on all aspects of basic, translational and clinical research on the design, development, manufacture, and evaluation of cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) methods applied to the cardiovascular system. Topical areas include, but are not limited to: New applications of magnetic resonance to improve the diagnostic strategies, risk stratification, characterization and management of diseases affecting the cardiovascular system. New methods to enhance or accelerate image acquisition and data analysis. Results of multicenter, or larger single-center studies that provide insight into the utility of CMR. Basic biological perceptions derived by CMR methods.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信