Colchicine for secondary prevention in patients with acute coronary syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Safia Shaikh, Mohammad Hamza, Sivaram Neppala, Sahib Singh, Prakash Upreti, Ahmed Muaaz Umer, K C Manish, Krutarth Pandya, Yasemin Bahar, Yasar Sattar, M Chadi Alraies
{"title":"Colchicine for secondary prevention in patients with acute coronary syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Safia Shaikh, Mohammad Hamza, Sivaram Neppala, Sahib Singh, Prakash Upreti, Ahmed Muaaz Umer, K C Manish, Krutarth Pandya, Yasemin Bahar, Yasar Sattar, M Chadi Alraies","doi":"10.1016/j.ijcard.2025.133045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite optimal therapy, coronary artery disease (CAD) remains a significant public health concern worldwide. Studies have increasingly recognized the role of inflammation in atherosclerosis. Colchicine, a potent anti-inflammatory drug commonly used to treat gout, and pericarditis is being evaluated in this study for its safety and efficacy in preventing CAD following an acute coronary syndrome (ACS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched PubMed and Embase for studies up to April 2024 comparing colchicine to standard medical treatment in ACS patients. Primary outcomes included major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and recurrent ACS, while secondary outcomes were cardiovascular death, congestive heart failure (CHF), stroke, hospitalizations, and gastrointestinal (GI) side effects. Data were pooled using a random-effects model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included nine studies with a pooled sample size of 7260 patients. The mean age was 60.1 (±11.8) years, with 19.3 % females and a mean follow-up duration of 8.5 (±6) months. Patients who received colchicine treatment demonstrated a reduced risk of re-hospitalizations (OR 0.52 [0.34-0.81]) but had increased GI effects (OR 2.10 [1.20-3.68]). There was no significant difference in cardiovascular death (OR 1.17 [0.52-2.63]), MACE (OR 0.68 [0.45-1.01]), stroke (OR 0.46 [0.18-1.18]), recurrent ACS (OR 0.55 [0.28-1.09]) and the incidence of CHF (OR 0.90 [0.38-2.12]) between patients treated with colchicine versus standard medical treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Adding colchicine to standard medical therapy in ACS patients significantly reduced hospitalizations but is associated with increased GI side effects. Further prospective trials are required to validate these findings and determine if early intervention with colchicine treatment improves clinical outcomes in ACS patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":13710,"journal":{"name":"International journal of cardiology","volume":" ","pages":"133045"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2025.133045","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Despite optimal therapy, coronary artery disease (CAD) remains a significant public health concern worldwide. Studies have increasingly recognized the role of inflammation in atherosclerosis. Colchicine, a potent anti-inflammatory drug commonly used to treat gout, and pericarditis is being evaluated in this study for its safety and efficacy in preventing CAD following an acute coronary syndrome (ACS).

Methods: We searched PubMed and Embase for studies up to April 2024 comparing colchicine to standard medical treatment in ACS patients. Primary outcomes included major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and recurrent ACS, while secondary outcomes were cardiovascular death, congestive heart failure (CHF), stroke, hospitalizations, and gastrointestinal (GI) side effects. Data were pooled using a random-effects model.

Results: We included nine studies with a pooled sample size of 7260 patients. The mean age was 60.1 (±11.8) years, with 19.3 % females and a mean follow-up duration of 8.5 (±6) months. Patients who received colchicine treatment demonstrated a reduced risk of re-hospitalizations (OR 0.52 [0.34-0.81]) but had increased GI effects (OR 2.10 [1.20-3.68]). There was no significant difference in cardiovascular death (OR 1.17 [0.52-2.63]), MACE (OR 0.68 [0.45-1.01]), stroke (OR 0.46 [0.18-1.18]), recurrent ACS (OR 0.55 [0.28-1.09]) and the incidence of CHF (OR 0.90 [0.38-2.12]) between patients treated with colchicine versus standard medical treatment.

Conclusion: Adding colchicine to standard medical therapy in ACS patients significantly reduced hospitalizations but is associated with increased GI side effects. Further prospective trials are required to validate these findings and determine if early intervention with colchicine treatment improves clinical outcomes in ACS patients.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International journal of cardiology
International journal of cardiology 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
5.70%
发文量
758
审稿时长
44 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Cardiology is devoted to cardiology in the broadest sense. Both basic research and clinical papers can be submitted. The journal serves the interest of both practicing clinicians and researchers. In addition to original papers, we are launching a range of new manuscript types, including Consensus and Position Papers, Systematic Reviews, Meta-analyses, and Short communications. Case reports are no longer acceptable. Controversial techniques, issues on health policy and social medicine are discussed and serve as useful tools for encouraging debate.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信