Evaluating the feasibility of a community-adapted multi-domain intervention for dementia prevention in older adults.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES
Yujiro Kuroda, Kosuke Fujita, Taiki Sugimoto, Kazuaki Uchida, Yoko Yokoyama, Taichi Shimazu, Junko Saito, Hidenori Arai, Takashi Sakurai
{"title":"Evaluating the feasibility of a community-adapted multi-domain intervention for dementia prevention in older adults.","authors":"Yujiro Kuroda, Kosuke Fujita, Taiki Sugimoto, Kazuaki Uchida, Yoko Yokoyama, Taichi Shimazu, Junko Saito, Hidenori Arai, Takashi Sakurai","doi":"10.1177/13872877251315042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dementia impacts individuals, families, and society, necessitating effective prevention strategies.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the feasibility of a community-adapted multi-domain intervention for dementia prevention among older adults in Obu City, Japan and how uncertainties in implementing definitive trials can be reduced.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 12-month one-arm intervention trial was conducted with 80 community-dwelling older adults aged 65-86 years from two district regions. The multi-domain intervention included physical exercise, nutrition guidance, cognitive training, social participation, and vascular risk management. The primary outcome was the continuation rate, defined as the proportion of participants attending >60% of classes from the initial assessment to 6 months. Secondary outcomes, such as fidelity, acceptability, and appropriateness, were assessed through qualitative and quantitative evaluations. Additionally, health outcomes, including cognitive function and overall lifestyle, were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study achieved continuation rates of 75% and 76% at 6 and 12 months, respectively, indicating high feasibility. Participants showed high program acceptability (average acceptance score, 4.4 of 5). Fidelity was high regarding content coverage and duration, although the frequency and coverage varied between study sites. Cognitive function remained stable; food-diversity status improved significantly over the study period, though the absence of a control group limits causal interpretation of these changes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The community-adapted multi-domain intervention for dementia prevention demonstrated high feasibility and acceptability among older adults. Our findings can help reduce uncertainties and support planning future definitive trials to evaluate the effectiveness of community-based dementia-prevention programs.</p>","PeriodicalId":14929,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Alzheimer's Disease","volume":" ","pages":"13872877251315042"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Alzheimer's Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13872877251315042","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Dementia impacts individuals, families, and society, necessitating effective prevention strategies.

Objective: To evaluate the feasibility of a community-adapted multi-domain intervention for dementia prevention among older adults in Obu City, Japan and how uncertainties in implementing definitive trials can be reduced.

Methods: A 12-month one-arm intervention trial was conducted with 80 community-dwelling older adults aged 65-86 years from two district regions. The multi-domain intervention included physical exercise, nutrition guidance, cognitive training, social participation, and vascular risk management. The primary outcome was the continuation rate, defined as the proportion of participants attending >60% of classes from the initial assessment to 6 months. Secondary outcomes, such as fidelity, acceptability, and appropriateness, were assessed through qualitative and quantitative evaluations. Additionally, health outcomes, including cognitive function and overall lifestyle, were evaluated.

Results: The study achieved continuation rates of 75% and 76% at 6 and 12 months, respectively, indicating high feasibility. Participants showed high program acceptability (average acceptance score, 4.4 of 5). Fidelity was high regarding content coverage and duration, although the frequency and coverage varied between study sites. Cognitive function remained stable; food-diversity status improved significantly over the study period, though the absence of a control group limits causal interpretation of these changes.

Conclusions: The community-adapted multi-domain intervention for dementia prevention demonstrated high feasibility and acceptability among older adults. Our findings can help reduce uncertainties and support planning future definitive trials to evaluate the effectiveness of community-based dementia-prevention programs.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Alzheimer's Disease
Journal of Alzheimer's Disease 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
7.50%
发文量
1327
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Alzheimer''s Disease (JAD) is an international multidisciplinary journal to facilitate progress in understanding the etiology, pathogenesis, epidemiology, genetics, behavior, treatment and psychology of Alzheimer''s disease. The journal publishes research reports, reviews, short communications, hypotheses, ethics reviews, book reviews, and letters-to-the-editor. The journal is dedicated to providing an open forum for original research that will expedite our fundamental understanding of Alzheimer''s disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信