Improved performance of cementless total knee arthroplasty (TKA)across international registries: a comparative review.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Meadhbh Ni Mhiochain de Grae, Armon Nasehi, David F Dalury, Bas A Masri, Gerard A Sheridan
{"title":"Improved performance of cementless total knee arthroplasty (TKA)across international registries: a comparative review.","authors":"Meadhbh Ni Mhiochain de Grae, Armon Nasehi, David F Dalury, Bas A Masri, Gerard A Sheridan","doi":"10.1007/s11845-025-03888-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cementless fixation in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has been associated with higher revision rates in the past. However, due to advancements in design, as well as surgical techniques, cementless TKA performance has significantly improved. The advantages of cementless fixation include reduced cement-related complications, shorter operating times, and the potential benefits of osseointegration. We aim to assess the improvement in revision rates for cementless TKA over the last 9 years based on international registry reports.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive retrospective review was conducted of six major English-speaking knee arthroplasty registries across the world including the National Joint Registry of England and Wales, Northern Islan Isle of Man and Guernsey (herby referred to as British), Swedish, Canadian, American, Australian, and New Zealand National Joint Registry. Data was collected from the year 2014 along with the most recent annual report published: 2022 or 2023. Data points collected included usage rates of cemented and cementless prostheses for primary TKA, their respective revision rates, and indications for revision.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Across four databases, there was an average 8.3% increase in the utilization of cementless fixation for primary TKA over the past decade. Three registries reported a reduction in revision rates for cementless fixation. Lower revision rates for cementless compared to cemented TKA were observed in the most recent American (3.2% cemented vs. 2.8% cementless) and New Zealand annual reports (11.8% cemented vs. 4.5% cementless). In 2022, the British registry reported lower rates of revision for infection with cementless fixation (0.56 vs. 0.89).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>International registries demonstrate increased utilization of cementless TKA. Cementless TKA was reported to have lower revision rates in the most recent US and New Zealand annual reports when compared to cemented TKA.</p>","PeriodicalId":14507,"journal":{"name":"Irish Journal of Medical Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Irish Journal of Medical Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-025-03888-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cementless fixation in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has been associated with higher revision rates in the past. However, due to advancements in design, as well as surgical techniques, cementless TKA performance has significantly improved. The advantages of cementless fixation include reduced cement-related complications, shorter operating times, and the potential benefits of osseointegration. We aim to assess the improvement in revision rates for cementless TKA over the last 9 years based on international registry reports.

Methods: A comprehensive retrospective review was conducted of six major English-speaking knee arthroplasty registries across the world including the National Joint Registry of England and Wales, Northern Islan Isle of Man and Guernsey (herby referred to as British), Swedish, Canadian, American, Australian, and New Zealand National Joint Registry. Data was collected from the year 2014 along with the most recent annual report published: 2022 or 2023. Data points collected included usage rates of cemented and cementless prostheses for primary TKA, their respective revision rates, and indications for revision.

Results: Across four databases, there was an average 8.3% increase in the utilization of cementless fixation for primary TKA over the past decade. Three registries reported a reduction in revision rates for cementless fixation. Lower revision rates for cementless compared to cemented TKA were observed in the most recent American (3.2% cemented vs. 2.8% cementless) and New Zealand annual reports (11.8% cemented vs. 4.5% cementless). In 2022, the British registry reported lower rates of revision for infection with cementless fixation (0.56 vs. 0.89).

Conclusion: International registries demonstrate increased utilization of cementless TKA. Cementless TKA was reported to have lower revision rates in the most recent US and New Zealand annual reports when compared to cemented TKA.

无骨水泥全膝关节置换术(TKA)在国际注册中的改进性能:一项比较回顾。
背景:在过去,全膝关节置换术(TKA)中无水泥固定与较高的翻修率相关。然而,由于设计和手术技术的进步,无水泥TKA的性能得到了显著改善。无骨水泥固定的优点包括减少骨水泥相关并发症,缩短手术时间,以及骨整合的潜在益处。我们的目标是根据国际注册报告评估过去9年来无水泥TKA修订率的提高。方法:对世界上六个主要的英语国家膝关节置换术注册中心进行了全面的回顾性研究,包括英格兰和威尔士国家联合注册中心、北岛马恩岛和根西岛(以下简称英国)、瑞典、加拿大、美国、澳大利亚和新西兰国家联合注册中心。数据收集自2014年以及最近发布的年度报告:2022年或2023年。收集的数据点包括原发性TKA中骨水泥假体和无骨水泥假体的使用率、各自的翻修率和翻修指征。结果:在四个数据库中,在过去十年中,无骨水泥固定治疗原发性TKA的使用率平均增加了8.3%。三个注册中心报告了无骨水泥固定复位率的降低。在最近的美国年度报告(3.2%的水泥固井对2.8%的水泥固井)和新西兰年度报告(11.8%的水泥固井对4.5%的水泥固井)中观察到,与水泥固井TKA相比,无水泥固井的修正率更低。2022年,英国登记处报告无骨水泥固定感染的翻修率较低(0.56比0.89)。结论:国际注册显示无水泥TKA的使用率增加。在最近的美国和新西兰年度报告中,与骨水泥TKA相比,无水泥TKA的修正率更低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Irish Journal of Medical Science
Irish Journal of Medical Science 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
357
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Irish Journal of Medical Science is the official organ of the Royal Academy of Medicine in Ireland. Established in 1832, this quarterly journal is a contribution to medical science and an ideal forum for the younger medical/scientific professional to enter world literature and an ideal launching platform now, as in the past, for many a young research worker. The primary role of both the Academy and IJMS is that of providing a forum for the exchange of scientific information and to promote academic discussion, so essential to scientific progress.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信