Individualized Occupational Therapy in Severe Mental Illness-A Recovery Model Approach from a Tertiary care Centre in South India.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Rachna George Joseph, Farah Cj James, Elizabeth Ninan, Arun Rachana, Suja Kurian
{"title":"Individualized Occupational Therapy in Severe Mental Illness-A Recovery Model Approach from a Tertiary care Centre in South India.","authors":"Rachna George Joseph, Farah Cj James, Elizabeth Ninan, Arun Rachana, Suja Kurian","doi":"10.1177/00207640251317008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Recovery Model for mental illness explores a broad range of domains for individuals with severe mental illness (SMI) which is not merely the absence from illness but attaining self-sufficiency. The individualized occupational therapy intervention which is part of the recovery model approach includes any or a combination of trainings like Social Skills training, Vocational training, Assertiveness training, Anger Management training, Life Skills training, Stress Management, Study Skills training, Cognitive retraining and Anxiety management.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>The objective of the current study was to evaluate the effectiveness in terms of functioning of individuals with (SMI) who had undergone individualized OT intervention.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Patients who had undergone individualized OT intervention were evaluated at designated time points i.e. at discharge, at 3 months and further at 6 months. The outcome measure of functional capacity was scored using the Global Assessment of Functioning instrument.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>A total of 31 patients were sampled. The diagnosis of Schizophrenia was seen in 77.4% (<i>n</i>-24) of the sample, Bipolar Affective Disorder in 12.9% (<i>n</i>-4) and Schizoaffective Disorder 9.7% (<i>n</i>-3). The mean GAF for the sample showed improvement and the increment in GAF was maintained on follow up.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In services with limited skilled human resources and where community-based services are not established, culturally adapted interventions with individualized OT interventions can ensure positive gains in terms of socio-occupational functioning.</p>","PeriodicalId":14304,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Social Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"207640251317008"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Social Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00207640251317008","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The Recovery Model for mental illness explores a broad range of domains for individuals with severe mental illness (SMI) which is not merely the absence from illness but attaining self-sufficiency. The individualized occupational therapy intervention which is part of the recovery model approach includes any or a combination of trainings like Social Skills training, Vocational training, Assertiveness training, Anger Management training, Life Skills training, Stress Management, Study Skills training, Cognitive retraining and Anxiety management.

Aims: The objective of the current study was to evaluate the effectiveness in terms of functioning of individuals with (SMI) who had undergone individualized OT intervention.

Method: Patients who had undergone individualized OT intervention were evaluated at designated time points i.e. at discharge, at 3 months and further at 6 months. The outcome measure of functional capacity was scored using the Global Assessment of Functioning instrument.

Result: A total of 31 patients were sampled. The diagnosis of Schizophrenia was seen in 77.4% (n-24) of the sample, Bipolar Affective Disorder in 12.9% (n-4) and Schizoaffective Disorder 9.7% (n-3). The mean GAF for the sample showed improvement and the increment in GAF was maintained on follow up.

Conclusions: In services with limited skilled human resources and where community-based services are not established, culturally adapted interventions with individualized OT interventions can ensure positive gains in terms of socio-occupational functioning.

严重精神疾病的个体化职业治疗——来自南印度三级保健中心的康复模式方法。
背景:精神疾病的康复模型为患有严重精神疾病(SMI)的个体探索了广泛的领域,这不仅仅是没有疾病,而是实现自给自足。个性化的职业治疗干预是康复模式方法的一部分,包括任何或组合的培训,如社交技能培训,职业培训,自信培训,愤怒管理培训,生活技能培训,压力管理,学习技能培训,认知再培训和焦虑管理。目的:本研究的目的是评估重度精神障碍患者(SMI)接受个体化OT干预后的功能效果。方法:在指定的时间点,即出院时、3个月时和6个月时,对接受个性化OT干预的患者进行评估。功能能力的结果测量使用功能整体评估工具评分。结果:共抽取31例患者。77.4% (n-24)被诊断为精神分裂症,12.9% (n-4)被诊断为双相情感障碍,9.7% (n-3)被诊断为分裂情感障碍。样本的平均GAF有所改善,并在随访中保持GAF的增加。结论:在技术人力资源有限的服务和没有建立社区服务的地方,文化适应干预与个性化的OT干预可以确保在社会职业功能方面取得积极成果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.30
自引率
1.30%
发文量
120
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Social Psychiatry, established in 1954, is a leading publication dedicated to the field of social psychiatry. It serves as a platform for the exchange of research findings and discussions on the influence of social, environmental, and cultural factors on mental health and well-being. The journal is particularly relevant to psychiatrists and multidisciplinary professionals globally who are interested in understanding the broader context of psychiatric disorders and their impact on individuals and communities. Social psychiatry, as a discipline, focuses on the origins and outcomes of mental health issues within a social framework, recognizing the interplay between societal structures and individual mental health. The journal draws connections with related fields such as social anthropology, cultural psychiatry, and sociology, and is influenced by the latest developments in these areas. The journal also places a special emphasis on fast-track publication for brief communications, ensuring that timely and significant research can be disseminated quickly. Additionally, it strives to reflect its international readership by publishing state-of-the-art reviews from various regions around the world, showcasing the diverse practices and perspectives within the psychiatric disciplines. This approach not only contributes to the scientific understanding of social psychiatry but also supports the global exchange of knowledge and best practices in mental health care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信