Effectiveness of current digital cognitive behavioural therapy for insomnia interventions for adolescents with insomnia symptoms: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Melissa A Cleary, Cele Richardson, Ruby J Ross, Helen S Heussler, Andrew Wilson, Jenny Downs, Jennifer Walsh
{"title":"Effectiveness of current digital cognitive behavioural therapy for insomnia interventions for adolescents with insomnia symptoms: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Melissa A Cleary, Cele Richardson, Ruby J Ross, Helen S Heussler, Andrew Wilson, Jenny Downs, Jennifer Walsh","doi":"10.1111/jsr.14466","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Sleep problems occur in up to 20%-45% of adolescents. This systematic review and meta-analysis examined the effectiveness of digital sleep interventions, based on cognitive behavioural therapy for insomnia, for adolescents with insomnia symptoms. The objective was to synthesise and quantify, through meta-analyses, changes in sleep following completion of a digital sleep-based intervention. MEDLINE, PubMed, PsycINFO, Scopus, EMBASE, CENTRAL, and Web of Science databases were searched from January 2012 to March 2024. Within-subject studies or randomized-controlled trials reporting the effects of digital cognitive behavioural therapy for insomnia were included. Risk of bias was assessed using the integrated quality criteria for the review of multiple study designs. Random-effects meta-analyses estimated pooled standardised within-subject mean differences to assess effectiveness. Nine studies involving 486 adolescents were included. Digital cognitive behavioural therapy for insomnia interventions were effective in reducing insomnia symptoms (Hedges' g = 1.40), subjective sleep-onset latency (Hedges' g = 0.72) and waking after sleep onset (Hedges' g = 0.47), and increasing subjective and objective total sleep time (Hedges' g = -0.29 and -0.23, respectively). Other objective measures of sleep did not improve. All studies met the minimum ICROMS score and were considered to be of sufficient quality. Seven within-subject studies failed to satisfy all mandatory criteria. These results suggest that digital cognitive behavioural therapy for insomnia interventions are effective in improving adolescent's perceptions of their sleep, but are less effective at improving some objective measures of sleep. To achieve a clear understanding of how digital cognitive behavioural therapy for insomnia interventions compare with other behavioural interventions, additional high-quality randomized-controlled trials comparing digital cognitive behavioural therapy for insomnia interventions with traditional in-person modalities are needed. (PROSPERO;CRD42021287479).</p>","PeriodicalId":17057,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sleep Research","volume":" ","pages":"e14466"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sleep Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jsr.14466","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Sleep problems occur in up to 20%-45% of adolescents. This systematic review and meta-analysis examined the effectiveness of digital sleep interventions, based on cognitive behavioural therapy for insomnia, for adolescents with insomnia symptoms. The objective was to synthesise and quantify, through meta-analyses, changes in sleep following completion of a digital sleep-based intervention. MEDLINE, PubMed, PsycINFO, Scopus, EMBASE, CENTRAL, and Web of Science databases were searched from January 2012 to March 2024. Within-subject studies or randomized-controlled trials reporting the effects of digital cognitive behavioural therapy for insomnia were included. Risk of bias was assessed using the integrated quality criteria for the review of multiple study designs. Random-effects meta-analyses estimated pooled standardised within-subject mean differences to assess effectiveness. Nine studies involving 486 adolescents were included. Digital cognitive behavioural therapy for insomnia interventions were effective in reducing insomnia symptoms (Hedges' g = 1.40), subjective sleep-onset latency (Hedges' g = 0.72) and waking after sleep onset (Hedges' g = 0.47), and increasing subjective and objective total sleep time (Hedges' g = -0.29 and -0.23, respectively). Other objective measures of sleep did not improve. All studies met the minimum ICROMS score and were considered to be of sufficient quality. Seven within-subject studies failed to satisfy all mandatory criteria. These results suggest that digital cognitive behavioural therapy for insomnia interventions are effective in improving adolescent's perceptions of their sleep, but are less effective at improving some objective measures of sleep. To achieve a clear understanding of how digital cognitive behavioural therapy for insomnia interventions compare with other behavioural interventions, additional high-quality randomized-controlled trials comparing digital cognitive behavioural therapy for insomnia interventions with traditional in-person modalities are needed. (PROSPERO;CRD42021287479).
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Sleep Research is dedicated to basic and clinical sleep research. The Journal publishes original research papers and invited reviews in all areas of sleep research (including biological rhythms). The Journal aims to promote the exchange of ideas between basic and clinical sleep researchers coming from a wide range of backgrounds and disciplines. The Journal will achieve this by publishing papers which use multidisciplinary and novel approaches to answer important questions about sleep, as well as its disorders and the treatment thereof.