Safety and efficacy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided pelvic abscess drainage with lumen-apposing metal stents for complicated acute diverticulitis.

IF 6.7 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Andrea Lisotti, Francesca D'Errico, Pietro Fusaroli, Francesco Decembrino, Graziella Masciangelo, Tawfik Khoury, Giovanni Barbara, Sarah Leblanc, Vincent Lepilliez, Bertrand Napoléon, Gianfranco Donatelli
{"title":"Safety and efficacy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided pelvic abscess drainage with lumen-apposing metal stents for complicated acute diverticulitis.","authors":"Andrea Lisotti, Francesca D'Errico, Pietro Fusaroli, Francesco Decembrino, Graziella Masciangelo, Tawfik Khoury, Giovanni Barbara, Sarah Leblanc, Vincent Lepilliez, Bertrand Napoléon, Gianfranco Donatelli","doi":"10.1016/j.gie.2025.02.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Endoscopic ultrasound-guided pelvic abscess drainage (EUS-PAD) with lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS) is an alternative approach for post-surgical and inflammatory pelvic collections. We assess the safety and efficacy of EUS-PAD with LAMS in a large population of complicated acute diverticulitis (AD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrieved consecutive patients who underwent EUS drainage attempts for complicated AD from 2019-2023 in three referral centers. All cases have been considered suitable for EUS-PAD after multidisciplinary discussion. Continuous variables are expressed as median [interquartile range].</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-six patients were retrieved; in 13 cases EUS-PAD was not indicated since no or small abscess was found. Fifty-three patients (29 female; age 74 [62-83] year-old] were finally included. Forty (75.5%) patients had pelvic abscess, while 13 (24.5%) had a para-colonic abscess, with a median size of 50 [40-60] mm. Trans-rectal and trans-colonic EUS-PAD were performed in 34 (64.2%) and 19 (35.8%) cases, respectively. Technical and clinical success rates were 92.5% and 88.7%; incidence of adverse events was 3.8% (one bleeding, one late migration). LAMS were removed after 19 [14-28] days. Median follow-up was 12 [8-12] months. Four (7.5%) patients underwent urgent Hartmann sigmoidectomy, while 12 (22.6%) patients required elective surgery; two (3.8%) patients presented recurrent diverticular abscesses. No procedure-related or disease-specific mortality was observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>EUS-PAD could be considered a safe and effective rescue strategy in case of failed or contraindicated percutaneous approach for the management of complicated AD to reduce the need for urgent surgery. Comparative data is necessary to confirm these observations.</p>","PeriodicalId":12542,"journal":{"name":"Gastrointestinal endoscopy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gastrointestinal endoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2025.02.003","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided pelvic abscess drainage (EUS-PAD) with lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS) is an alternative approach for post-surgical and inflammatory pelvic collections. We assess the safety and efficacy of EUS-PAD with LAMS in a large population of complicated acute diverticulitis (AD).

Methods: We retrieved consecutive patients who underwent EUS drainage attempts for complicated AD from 2019-2023 in three referral centers. All cases have been considered suitable for EUS-PAD after multidisciplinary discussion. Continuous variables are expressed as median [interquartile range].

Results: Sixty-six patients were retrieved; in 13 cases EUS-PAD was not indicated since no or small abscess was found. Fifty-three patients (29 female; age 74 [62-83] year-old] were finally included. Forty (75.5%) patients had pelvic abscess, while 13 (24.5%) had a para-colonic abscess, with a median size of 50 [40-60] mm. Trans-rectal and trans-colonic EUS-PAD were performed in 34 (64.2%) and 19 (35.8%) cases, respectively. Technical and clinical success rates were 92.5% and 88.7%; incidence of adverse events was 3.8% (one bleeding, one late migration). LAMS were removed after 19 [14-28] days. Median follow-up was 12 [8-12] months. Four (7.5%) patients underwent urgent Hartmann sigmoidectomy, while 12 (22.6%) patients required elective surgery; two (3.8%) patients presented recurrent diverticular abscesses. No procedure-related or disease-specific mortality was observed.

Conclusion: EUS-PAD could be considered a safe and effective rescue strategy in case of failed or contraindicated percutaneous approach for the management of complicated AD to reduce the need for urgent surgery. Comparative data is necessary to confirm these observations.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Gastrointestinal endoscopy
Gastrointestinal endoscopy 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
7.80%
发文量
1441
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Gastrointestinal Endoscopy is a journal publishing original, peer-reviewed articles on endoscopic procedures for studying, diagnosing, and treating digestive diseases. It covers outcomes research, prospective studies, and controlled trials of new endoscopic instruments and treatment methods. The online features include full-text articles, video and audio clips, and MEDLINE links. The journal serves as an international forum for the latest developments in the specialty, offering challenging reports from authorities worldwide. It also publishes abstracts of significant articles from other clinical publications, accompanied by expert commentaries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信