Suboptimal knee prosthesis design for Vietnamese women: a computed tomography-based arthrometric study.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 ANATOMY & MORPHOLOGY
Tu Hoang Thanh Pham, Hieu Trung Pham, Nam Tu Vu, Hoang Viet Nguyen, Dung Trung Tran, Nang Vo Sy Quyen
{"title":"Suboptimal knee prosthesis design for Vietnamese women: a computed tomography-based arthrometric study.","authors":"Tu Hoang Thanh Pham, Hieu Trung Pham, Nam Tu Vu, Hoang Viet Nguyen, Dung Trung Tran, Nang Vo Sy Quyen","doi":"10.5603/fm.103066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mismatches between knee dimensions and implant sizes can result in poor outcomes and dissatisfaction following total knee replacement. We aimed to evaluate knee morphology in Vietnamese women and assess the compatibility of available prostheses.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Using the full-leg CT scan datasets, we reconstructed 3D models of knee joints with software. After simulating femoral and tibial bone cuts with the mechanical alignment, the anteroposterior (AP) and mediolateral (ML) widths of the resection surfaces were measured. Six available prostheses were analyzed for their compatibility and coverage percent of the resected bone.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 40 female patients with osteoarthritis (aged 51-79). AP and ML dimensions of distal femur were 63.07 ± 3.05 mm and 57.46 ± 3.06 mm; those of proximal tibia were 48.95 ± 3.01 mm and 67.14 ± 3.49 mm. Smaller knees exhibited higher femoral aspect ratio (ML/AP) compared to larger knees. Increasing the tibial AP resulted in a smaller ML length of the proximal tibia relative to the tibial component. With the AP and ML mismatch set at ± 1.5 and ± 3 mm, prosthesis system provided the best femoral component fit at only 67.5%. Tibial component coverage rates varied among implant systems, with the best fit prosthesis system covering 92.5% at a tolerance of ± 3 mm for both AP and ML dimensions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The current prosthetic options show significant mismatches with the knee morphology of Vietnamese women, highlighting the need for better suited implant designs. Further research is necessary to develop suitable prosthetic solutions.</p>","PeriodicalId":12251,"journal":{"name":"Folia morphologica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Folia morphologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5603/fm.103066","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANATOMY & MORPHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Mismatches between knee dimensions and implant sizes can result in poor outcomes and dissatisfaction following total knee replacement. We aimed to evaluate knee morphology in Vietnamese women and assess the compatibility of available prostheses.

Materials and methods: Using the full-leg CT scan datasets, we reconstructed 3D models of knee joints with software. After simulating femoral and tibial bone cuts with the mechanical alignment, the anteroposterior (AP) and mediolateral (ML) widths of the resection surfaces were measured. Six available prostheses were analyzed for their compatibility and coverage percent of the resected bone.

Results: The study included 40 female patients with osteoarthritis (aged 51-79). AP and ML dimensions of distal femur were 63.07 ± 3.05 mm and 57.46 ± 3.06 mm; those of proximal tibia were 48.95 ± 3.01 mm and 67.14 ± 3.49 mm. Smaller knees exhibited higher femoral aspect ratio (ML/AP) compared to larger knees. Increasing the tibial AP resulted in a smaller ML length of the proximal tibia relative to the tibial component. With the AP and ML mismatch set at ± 1.5 and ± 3 mm, prosthesis system provided the best femoral component fit at only 67.5%. Tibial component coverage rates varied among implant systems, with the best fit prosthesis system covering 92.5% at a tolerance of ± 3 mm for both AP and ML dimensions.

Conclusions: The current prosthetic options show significant mismatches with the knee morphology of Vietnamese women, highlighting the need for better suited implant designs. Further research is necessary to develop suitable prosthetic solutions.

越南女性次优膝关节假体设计:一项基于计算机断层扫描的关节测量研究。
背景:膝关节尺寸和假体尺寸不匹配会导致全膝关节置换术后不良的预后和不满意。我们的目的是评估越南妇女的膝关节形态,并评估现有假体的相容性。材料与方法:利用全腿CT扫描数据集,用软件重建膝关节三维模型。在机械对准模拟股骨和胫骨切割后,测量切除表面的正前方(AP)和中外侧(ML)宽度。分析了六种可用的假体的相容性和切除骨的覆盖率。结果:纳入女性骨关节炎患者40例(年龄51 ~ 79岁)。股骨远端AP、ML尺寸分别为63.07±3.05 mm、57.46±3.06 mm;胫骨近端分别为48.95±3.01 mm和67.14±3.49 mm。较小的膝关节与较大的膝关节相比,股骨宽高比(ML/AP)较高。增加胫骨AP导致胫骨近端相对于胫骨组件的ML长度较小。当AP和ML错配设置为±1.5和±3 mm时,假体系统提供的最佳股骨假体配合率仅为67.5%。胫骨假体覆盖率因种植体系统而异,最适合的假体系统在AP和ML尺寸±3 mm的公差下覆盖率为92.5%。结论:目前的假体选择与越南妇女的膝关节形态显着不匹配,强调需要更适合的假体设计。需要进一步的研究来开发合适的假肢解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Folia morphologica
Folia morphologica ANATOMY & MORPHOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
218
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: "Folia Morphologica" is an official journal of the Polish Anatomical Society (a Constituent Member of European Federation for Experimental Morphology - EFEM). It contains original articles and reviews on morphology in the broadest sense (descriptive, experimental, and methodological). Papers dealing with practical application of morphological research to clinical problems may also be considered. Full-length papers as well as short research notes can be submitted. Descriptive papers dealing with non-mammals, cannot be accepted for publication with some exception.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信